钦州市区白话与北海廉州话语音比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-03 23:40

本文选题：钦州白话 + 廉州话　；参考：《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文在对钦廉片粤语中具有代表性的钦州市区白话和北海合浦县廉州镇廉州话进行全面调查的基础上,对其语音进行了较为全面的描写和比较,力图全面揭示钦廉片粤语语音的面貌和特点,为广西粤方言语音比较研究提供翔实的一手语料,为广西粤方言内部划分提供一些科学佐证,为丰富语言接触理论提供一些依据。本文由六大部分组成:一、第一章:概论。主要介绍钦州市与北海廉州镇的人文地理概况和语言概况,并简述广西粤方言语音研究的现状,同时也就本文的研究意义、研究目的及所使用的研究方法进行阐释说明,对其中所使用的方言材料来源和文章中所使用的符号表示的意义等方面简单介绍。二、第二章:钦州市区白话与北海廉州话语音系统。对钦州市区白话与北海廉州话的语音系统进行系统的描写,归纳它们的声韵调系统,并梳理出两个方言点的声韵调配合关系表。三、第三章:钦州市区白话与北海廉州话语音纵向比较研究。将钦州市区白话、北海廉州话的声韵调分别与中古音的声韵调系统对比,揭示钦州市区白话和北海廉州话的语音特征。四、第四章:钦州市区白话与北海廉州话语音横向比较研究。通过将这两个方言点与广州话(广府粤语)、南宁亭子平话(桂南平话)、博白县沙河客家话(客家话)、玉林白话(勾漏片)、贵港白话、南宁白话等6个方言点之间的语音横向比较,揭示彼此在语音方面的一致性和差异性。五、第五章:结语。基于上文对钦州市区白话、北海廉州话语音的纵横向比较分析结果,总结二者的主要语音特征及语言接触的特点与规律,并对其归属问题进行探讨。六、第六章:附录。钦州市区白话与北海廉州话同音字汇。
[Abstract]:On the basis of a comprehensive investigation of Qinzhou dialect and Lianzhou dialect in Beihai Hepu County, this paper gives a comprehensive description and comparison of their pronunciation. This paper tries to reveal the features and features of the Cantonese pronunciation in Qinlian film, to provide detailed and accurate data for the comparative study of the pronunciation of Guangxi Cantonese dialect, to provide some scientific evidence for the internal division of Guangxi Cantonese dialect, and to provide some basis for enriching the theory of language contact. This paper consists of six parts: one, chapter one: introduction. This paper mainly introduces the general situation of human geography and language in Qinzhou and Lianzhou towns in Beihai, and briefly describes the present situation of the phonetic research of Guangxi Cantonese dialect. At the same time, it also explains the significance, the purpose and the research methods used in this paper. This paper briefly introduces the source of the dialect material and the meaning of the symbolic representation used in the article. Chapter two: Qinzhou City vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect phonetic system. This paper systematically describes the phonetic system of Qinzhou urban vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect, sums up their phonological tone systems, and combs out the phonological coordination relation tables of the two dialect points. Chapter three: a comparative study on the pronunciation of Qinzhou urban vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect. The phonological characteristics of Qinzhou urban vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect are revealed by comparing the phonological tone of Qinzhou urban area and Beihai Lianzhou dialect with those of middle ancient Chinese. Chapter four: comparative study on pronunciation of Qinzhou urban vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect. By combining these two dialects with Cantonese (Cantonese from Guangfu), Tingzi Ping from Nanning (Gui Nan Ping dialect), Shahe Hakka dialect (Hakka dialect) from Bobai County (Hakka dialect), Yulin dialect (Gou Bian Pian, Guigang vernacular), The phonetic comparison of six dialect points in Nanning reveals the consistency and difference in pronunciation between them. Chapter five: conclusion. Based on the results of vertical and horizontal comparison and analysis of the pronunciation of Qinzhou urban vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect, this paper summarizes their main phonetic characteristics and the characteristics and rules of language contact, and probes into their attribution. Chapter VI: appendix. Qinzhou urban vernacular and Beihai Lianzhou dialect homonym.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H178

【参考文献】