“通文字之用”与“我手写吾口”——黄遵宪语文思想的两个向度

发布时间：2018-05-10 14:25

本文选题：黄遵宪 + 语文思想　；参考：《社会科学》2017年04期

【摘要】：黄遵宪语文改良思想有两个向度,其一是“通文字之用”,其二是“我手写吾口”。前者思想缘起在于言、文长久分离,受教育阶层与未受教育阶层身份地位长久固化且立场观念对立严重,而其改良落实则在于“天下之农工商贾妇女幼稚”皆能“通文字之用”;后者的立意则在于书写者个体的主体性的完整实现,其立场在于批评泥古不化、受其拘牵。在清末民初的语文及文学改良思潮中,这两种诉求既彼此呼应又有所差别,而在具体的历史叙述中,两者之间的差别又往往被忽略而被混同一体,这不仅不利于对汉语中长久存在的言、文分合现象以及此间全新“读者”关切意识兴起适度且深入之考察,也妨碍了对于近代书写者个体之主体意识的完整性诉求应有之关注研究。
[Abstract]:Huang Zunxian's thought of Chinese improvement has two dimensions, one is "the use of Chinese characters", the other is "I write my mouth." The origin of the former thought lies in the long separation of literature, the permanent solidification of the status of the educated class and the uneducated class, and the serious opposition between their positions and concepts. Its improvement and implementation lies in the "immature women of agriculture, commerce and industry in the world" can "use the characters"; the latter's intention lies in the complete realization of the individual subjectivity of the writer, and its position lies in the criticism of the mud and the ancient times, and is led by it. In the trend of Chinese and literature improvement in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, these two kinds of demands echoed and differed from each other, while in the specific historical narration, the differences between the two were often ignored and mixed together. This is not only unfavorable to the study of the long-existing Chinese language, the phenomenon of separation between two texts, and the rise of a new "reader" awareness of concern, but also to a proper and in-depth study of the phenomenon. It also hinders the research on the integrality of the individual consciousness of modern writers.
【作者单位】：复旦大学中文系;
【分类号】：I206.5;H109.3

【共引文献】