应用语言学方向硕士论文和期刊文章中文献引用对比研究
发布时间:2018-06-28 15:24
本文选题:引用 + 学术写作 ; 参考:《上海外国语大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:文献引用时下备受关注。作为学术论文写作最重要的特征之一,文献引用能反映作者对所处领域的认知程度。即便如此,关于中国外语学习者的引用实践研究屈指可数。本研究沿用胡、王(2014)二人的引用分析框架,从引用密度、引用类型、互文策略、作者立场四个维度对比分析了学生和专家英语学术论文中的引用情况。研究分析了应用语言学方向21篇知网优秀硕士论文和42篇中国学者发表的期刊论文,并采访了8位学业有成的研究生三年级学生和2位研究生导师。研究发现:1)学生和专家文章引用总体分布大致相同。学生和专家在文章引言和文献综述处引用多,其余部分引用较少。学生和专家均大量使用“支持”和“中立”型引用,少有“疏离”和“反对”型引用。学生和专家文章中间接引用远远多于直接引用。其中原因主要是学术写作的程式性以及学生有能力且愿意遵循学术写作的基本惯例。2)学生和专家文献引用的不同之处有:学生论文中的引用总量显著低于专家,而且专家在论文各个部分的引用密度均高于学生,方法论部分尤甚;相较而言,学生文中“中立”型引用多、“支持”型引用少;学生偏好直接引用,专家更多结合使用直接、间接引用;学生偏好融入式引用,专家多用非融入式引用。研究以为学生和专家对一些引用类型看法不同,写作水平不一是导致二者文献引用差异的两大主要原因。本研究有助于二语学习者认识到并弥补自己在引用上与专家之间存在的差异,并启发学术写作教学。
[Abstract]:Literature citations have attracted much attention at the present time. As one of the most important features of the writing of academic papers, the citation of literature can reflect the cognitive degree of the author's field. Even so, there are only a few citation studies on Chinese foreign language learners. Using the citation analysis framework of Hu and Wang (2014), this study contrasts and analyzes the citations in English academic papers of students and experts from four dimensions: citation density, citation type, intertextuality, and the author's position. In this study, 21 excellent master's papers and 42 periodical papers published by Chinese scholars in applied linguistics were analyzed, and 8 successful graduate students and 2 graduate tutors were interviewed. The study found that: 1) the overall distribution of citations in student and expert articles is roughly the same. Students and experts quote more in the introduction and literature review, and less in the rest. Both students and experts use "support" and "neutral" references, and few "alienation" and "opposition" references. There are far more indirect references in student and expert articles than direct citations. The main reasons are the formality of academic writing and the ability and willingness of students to follow the basic practice of academic writing. 2) the differences between student and expert literature citations are: the total number of citations in student papers is significantly lower than that of experts. Moreover, the citation density of the experts in each part of the paper is higher than that of the students, especially in the methodology part; in comparison, the students' references of "neutral" type and "support" type are more than those of the students; the students prefer direct references, and the experts use more direct references. Indirect citations; students prefer inclusion references, experts use non-inclusive references. The study suggests that students and experts have different views on some citation types, and different writing skills are the two main reasons leading to the difference in citation between them. This study is helpful for L2 learners to recognize and make up for the differences between their citations and experts, and to enlighten the teaching of academic writing.
【学位授予单位】:上海外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 徐f ;;二语学术写作的引证能力及其发展特征:截面与历时证据[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2016年03期
2 赵梦娟;钟兰凤;;学生研究者英语学术论文中的引用研究[J];外国语言文学;2016年01期
3 马蓉;秦晓晴;;二语写作互文应用能力研究[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年06期
4 刘诗宇;朱效惠;;英语专业学位论文与英文期刊论文中文献引用特征的对比研究[J];外语与翻译;2015年03期
5 马蓉;秦晓晴;;二语学术写作中的引用特征及与写作质量的关系[J];外语电化教学;2014年05期
6 武卫;周榕;;基于语料库的中国英语专业学生毕业论文文献引用研究[J];外国语言文学;2014年01期
7 郑新民;;中外应用语言学学位论文写作对比研究[J];外语电化教学;2009年03期
,本文编号:2078428
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2078428.html