指示词与直接指称理论

发布时间：2018-07-05 12:53

本文选题：指示词 + 直接指称理论　；参考：《学术研究》2015年05期

【摘要】：卡普兰和佩里建立的直接指称理论对弗雷格以来的语义学框架提出了深刻的批评。我们对基于指示词研究的直接指称理论的模态论证进行了重述和分析,说明它比克里普克的模态论证更强;直接指称词项与严格指示子之间的区别也进一步得到了讨论。我们澄清了直接指称理论的激进和温和版本的差异,并强调不同版本间的共同核心论题在于对单称命题的确认,在此基础上指出直接指称理论和指称的因果理论之间的相互独立性。
[Abstract]:Kaplan and Perry's direct reference theory deeply criticized Frege's semantic framework. We restate and analyze the modal argumentation of direct reference theory based on deixis, and show that it is stronger than Kripke's modal argument, and the difference between direct reference term and strict deixis is further discussed. We clarify the differences between the radical and moderate versions of the direct reference theory and emphasize that the common core theme among the different versions is the confirmation of monomorphic propositions. On this basis, the mutual independence between direct reference theory and referential causality theory is pointed out.
【作者单位】：中山大学哲学系;中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“基于内涵语义的指称与模态问题研究”(11CZX053)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：H0-05

【相似文献】