庭审会话中法官的话语立场研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 09:57

本文选题：庭审会话 + 法官话语　；参考：《华中师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以真实的庭审会话为语料,运用话语立场、话语分析的理论方法对法官的话语立场问题展开研究,逐层分析法官话语立场的类型、表达方式和规范问题。全文共分为五个部分:第一部分是绪论,包括研究内容、研究意义、研究现状、研究方法和语料说明。第二部分主要研究法官话语立场的类型。首先将法官的话语立场划分为评价立场、情感立场、认识立场和(非)一致性立场四类,然后对每一类型分别论述:法官评价,是用价值标准衡量诉讼参与人行为的活动,包括肯定评价和否定评价;法官情感,是法官对于案件中人事物的倾向性反应,包括积极情感和消极情感两类;法官认识,是法官对所获信息的认知,包括经验型认识和知识型认识;法官的(非)一致性,是指对前话人观点的认同或不认同,包括一致性和不一致性。第三部分主要考察法官话语立场的表达方式。考察发现,法官的评价立场主要有词汇、问话和转述三种表达方式;情感立场主要运用描述和反问两种表达方式;认识立场主要通过推断和引证表达;(非)一致性立场的表达,法官主要运用打断、重复、控题三种方式。第四部分主要探讨法官话语立场的规范问题。制度层面上,将“法官中立”确立为法律基本原则,落实回避制度、完善法官职业道德制度,加强规定力度;完善法官薪酬制度和审判独立制度,降低外部环境影响;建立“庭审直播”制度,形成监督常态。话语层面上,在评价立场、情感立场、认识立场、(非)一致性立场的表达上,做到合理合法。第五部分是结语,对全文进行总结,主要包括研究成果、创新之处和不足之处。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the real trial session as the corpus, uses the discourse standpoint, the discourse analysis theory method to carry on the research to the judge's discourse position question, analyzes the judge's discourse position type, the expression way and the standard question layer by layer. The paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, including the research content, research significance, research status, research methods and corpus description. The second part mainly studies the types of judges' discourse positions. First of all, judges' discourse positions are divided into four categories: evaluation position, emotional position, cognitive position and (non-consistency) position, and then discusses each type separately: judge evaluation is a measure of the activities of litigation participants' behavior by the standard of value. Including positive evaluation and negative evaluation; judge emotion is the judge's tendentious reaction to the human matter in the case, including positive emotion and negative emotion; judge cognition, is judge's cognition to the information obtained, The judge's (non-consistency) refers to the recognition or disapproval of the former speaker's viewpoint, including consistency and inconsistency. The third part mainly studies the expression of the judge's discourse position. It is found that judges' evaluation positions are mainly composed of three expressions: vocabulary, questioning and reporting; affective positions are mainly expressed by description and counter-questioning; cognitive positions are mainly expressed by inference and citation; (non-consistent positions) are expressed. The judge mainly uses three ways of interrupting, repeating and controlling questions. The fourth part mainly discusses the normative issues of judges' discourse position. On the system level, we should establish "the neutrality of judges" as the basic principle of law, implement the system of recusal, perfect the system of judges' professional ethics, strengthen the regulation, perfect the system of judges' compensation and judicial independence, and reduce the influence of external environment. Establish the system of "live trial" and form the normal state of supervision. At the discourse level, it is reasonable and legal to express the evaluation position, the emotional position, the cognitive position and the (non -) consistent position. The fifth part is the conclusion, summarizes the full text, mainly includes the research result, the innovation and the deficiency.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【相似文献】