《说文同文》意义系统研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 13:06

本文选题：黄侃 + 《说文同文》　；参考：《中央民族大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以黄侃的《说文同文》为研究对象,从训诂学的角度考察它所体现的黄侃关于文字孳生发展演变的规律。从义同和义通的角度出发,探讨黄侃对二者的界定,并结合《说文同文》的实际用例考察其意义关系。了解义同和义通的实质内容,并对所提炼的意义关系进行汇总分析,形成各自的意义系统,从而深入了解黄侃所谓的“同”的深刻含义。本文共分为六个部分。第一个部分是绪论部分,首先对《说文同文》进行了简单的介绍,并提出了选题的缘起和意义。其次对黄侃的说文学进行了综述概括。最后说明本文的研究方法和研究材料。第二部分是《说文同文》概况和相关术语。首先对《说文同文》进行条例数据的汇总,并根据实际情况进行校正、删减和合并,汇总出所要考察的条例。其次对“同文”和“同字”术语进行了辨证,为其做出明确的界定,再次对本文中使用的字和词的术语进行了说明。第三部分是《说文同文》的义同关系。从训释语、黄侃的变易分类以及黄侃散落在各书籍中的例证三个角度来考察义同条例,并找出其意义关系。第四部分是《说文同文》的义通关系。从黄侃的一些论述及例证,黄侃对孳乳的分类及例证来考察义通条例,并找出其意义关系。第五部分是《说文同文》义同、义通的意义系统。义同体现为一种宽泛的概念域,在这一概念域中可以存在各种细微的区别,但不论如何变化,都是共存在同一概念域中。义通体现的是通中有异,通是起点,异是各自的发展路径。第六部分是结语,总结收束全文,概括义同和义通的意义系统,并总结《说文同文》“同”的意义关系。
[Abstract]:From the angle of exegesis, this paper examines the law of Huang Kan's development and evolution from the perspective of exegesis. From the point of view of righteousness and justice and righteousness, this paper explores the definition of Huang Kan's two parties, and examines its significance with the actual use cases of "the same text". The meaning system is summarized and analyzed to form their own meaning system, so as to deeply understand the profound meaning of "Tong" by Huang Kan. This article is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction part. First, it briefly introduces the "same text", and puts forward the origin and significance of the topic. Secondly, Huang Kan A summary of literature is summarized. Finally, the methods and materials of this article are explained. The second part is the general situation and related terminology of "the same language". First, it summarizes the data of the article of the same text, and corrects the actual situation, reduces and merge, summarizes the regulations to be inspecting. Secondly, the "same" and "same words" The terminology is dialectically differentiated to make a clear definition of the term, and the terminology of the words and words used in this article is explained again. The third part is the meaning and the same relationship between the text of the text and the text. From the interpretation, the changes in the classification of Huang Kan and the illustration of Huang Kan in the books, the meaning and the same regulations are examined and the meaning relationship is found. Fourth Part is the relationship between "speaking and writing". From some of the discussions and examples of Huang Kan, Huang Kan examines the classification and examples of the breeding, and finds out its meaning relationship. The fifth part is the meaning system of "the same language", the meaning and the meaning system. The sixth part is the conclusion, the conclusion, the summary of the full text, the meaning system of righteousness and righteousness, and the summary of the meaning relationship between the text of the same language and the same.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H161

【相似文献】