《方言》“散,杀也”疏证
发布时间：2018-07-26 08:49
【摘要】：《方言》卷三记载古齐方言“散,杀也”,但是前人研究中只找到两个文献用例,且不甚妥当,不免使人生疑。文章指出,《史记·淮阴侯列传》韩信之语“何所不散”、东周齐国兵器铭文“散戈”等中的“散”都是杀伐义,齐国兵器铭文所记当然是齐方言,韩信是淮阴人(今江苏淮安),地近东齐,应该也会说东齐方言,证明训杀伐之“散”确实是古齐方言。根据出土先秦文献的用字习惯,文章又研究“散”之语源,指出训杀伐之“散”应语源于当翦灭讲的“R,”。“散”表杀义,不是一般地杀,而是全部地彻底地击杀。
[Abstract]:The third volume of dialect records the ancient Qi dialect "scattered, killed also", but previous studies only found two cases of literature use, and not very appropriate, can not help but make people doubt. The article points out that the language of Han Xin is "what is not scattered", and the "San" in the inscription "Sango" on the weapon of Qi in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty is of course the dialect of Qi. Han Xin is a native of Huaiyin (Huai'an, Jiangsu Province), the near East Qi, should also speak the East Qi dialect, which proves that Xunshavazhi "San" is indeed the ancient Qi dialect. According to the usage habit of unearthed pre-Qin literature, the article also studies the etymology of "San", and points out that the "scattered" language of Xunzhihua originated from "R," of bentgrass. "Sand" is not a general killing, but a complete and complete killing.
【作者单位】： 江苏师范大学语言科学与艺术学院;江苏师范大学语言科学研究院;语言能力协同创新中心;
【分类号】：H131.7
本文编号：2145484
[Abstract]:The third volume of dialect records the ancient Qi dialect "scattered, killed also", but previous studies only found two cases of literature use, and not very appropriate, can not help but make people doubt. The article points out that the language of Han Xin is "what is not scattered", and the "San" in the inscription "Sango" on the weapon of Qi in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty is of course the dialect of Qi. Han Xin is a native of Huaiyin (Huai'an, Jiangsu Province), the near East Qi, should also speak the East Qi dialect, which proves that Xunshavazhi "San" is indeed the ancient Qi dialect. According to the usage habit of unearthed pre-Qin literature, the article also studies the etymology of "San", and points out that the "scattered" language of Xunzhihua originated from "R," of bentgrass. "Sand" is not a general killing, but a complete and complete killing.
【作者单位】： 江苏师范大学语言科学与艺术学院;江苏师范大学语言科学研究院;语言能力协同创新中心;
【分类号】：H131.7
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前1条
1 詹子庆;;周人自称“有夏”原因探析[A];周秦社会与文化研究——纪念中国先秦史学会成立20周年学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 温翘楚;先秦文献中的体相研究[D];福建师范大学;2016年
2 徐静;先秦文献中的“中”[D];曲阜师范大学;2011年
3 宗丽丽;试论先秦文献中的动物文化与文化动物[D];华中师范大学;2009年
4 吴迪;先秦文献中的“道”[D];曲阜师范大学;2012年
5 陆从兰;出土先秦文献中的“也”“只”及相关字研究[D];安徽大学;2011年
6 李华;先秦诸子生死观研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2007年
7 赵海军;古今文献之箕子记载与研究综述[D];东北师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2145484
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2145484.html
