聋人反语理解实验研究
发布时间：2018-08-07 14:09
【摘要】：一些心理学实验认为反语加工比其对应的字面义加工过程更加复杂,因此需要的阅读时间更加长;另一些实验则证明这两者的加工速度差不多。而且,在反语研究方面,关于聋人如何阅读和加工反语还尚未知晓。因此,本研究通过两个实验,对聋人大学生如何理解和加工反语进行了研究。实验一和实验二都使用了自步速阅读范式。在实验一和实验二中,变量都是两种不同情境的材料,反语情境或者字面义情境,以及被试的类型,聋人或者健听人。实验一和实验二的不同之处主要在于材料。研究产生三个结果,(1)跟健听人相比,聋人阅读反语需要更长的时间和更多的加工资源。(2)对于聋人来说,反语比其对应的字面义更难理解。(3)被试在阅读语境不同,关键句相同的反语和非反语句时,比阅读语境相同,关键句不同的反语和非反语句,更有显著差异。实验的研究结果表明,由于聋人的中文书面语水平比健听人差,因此,相比于健听人,聋人阅读反语的难度更加大。
[Abstract]:Some psychological experiments suggest that irony processing is more complex than its literal processing process, and therefore require a longer reading time; others prove that the processing speed of these two processes is similar. Moreover, in irony research, how deaf people read and process irony is unknown. Therefore, this study studies how deaf college students understand and process irony through two experiments. Both experiments 1 and 2 used the self-paced reading paradigm. In experiment 1 and experiment 2, the variables are the materials of two different situations, the irony situation or the literal situation, and the type of the subjects, the deaf person or the deaf person. The difference between experiment 1 and experiment 2 lies in the material. The results of the study were as follows: (1) deaf people need longer time and more processing resources to read irony than those with healthy hearing. (2) for deaf people, irony is more difficult to understand than its literal meaning. (3) subjects are different in reading context. When the key sentences have the same irony and non-reflexive sentences, there are more significant differences than the reading context, and the key sentences have different irony and non-reflexive sentences. The experimental results show that deaf people have more difficulty in reading irony than those in healthy hearing because their Chinese written language level is worse than that of healthy hearing people.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H09;G762
本文编号：2170269
[Abstract]:Some psychological experiments suggest that irony processing is more complex than its literal processing process, and therefore require a longer reading time; others prove that the processing speed of these two processes is similar. Moreover, in irony research, how deaf people read and process irony is unknown. Therefore, this study studies how deaf college students understand and process irony through two experiments. Both experiments 1 and 2 used the self-paced reading paradigm. In experiment 1 and experiment 2, the variables are the materials of two different situations, the irony situation or the literal situation, and the type of the subjects, the deaf person or the deaf person. The difference between experiment 1 and experiment 2 lies in the material. The results of the study were as follows: (1) deaf people need longer time and more processing resources to read irony than those with healthy hearing. (2) for deaf people, irony is more difficult to understand than its literal meaning. (3) subjects are different in reading context. When the key sentences have the same irony and non-reflexive sentences, there are more significant differences than the reading context, and the key sentences have different irony and non-reflexive sentences. The experimental results show that deaf people have more difficulty in reading irony than those in healthy hearing because their Chinese written language level is worse than that of healthy hearing people.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H09;G762
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前1条
1 张萌;张积家;;语调在6~10岁儿童对不同类型反语认知中的作用[J];心理学报;2006年02期
，本文编号：2170269
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2170269.html
