汉缅性质形容词对比研究
发布时间：2018-10-31 13:29
【摘要】：词汇是一种语言中的重要因素之一,其中形容词在汉缅语言当中较为活跃的一类词。本文对汉缅性质性质形容词进行对比研究,汉语和缅甸语虽然分属不同的语言类型,但它们之间必定有共同点与不同点。本人通过《新HSK词汇大纲》中的674个性质形容词的分类,结构,句法功能三个层面对两种语言进行对比研究。本文共分为三个部分,具体内容如下:第一部分:对比汉缅性质形容词的分类。第二部分:对比汉缅性质形容词的结构。第三部分:对比汉缅性质形容词的句法功能;作定语,作谓语,作状语,作补语,作主宾语。
[Abstract]:Vocabulary is one of the important factors in a language, among which adjectives are more active in Chinese and Myanmar languages. This paper makes a contrastive study of Chinese and Myanmar adjectives. Although Chinese and Burmese belong to different language types, there must be similarities and differences between them. In this paper, the author makes a comparative study of the two languages at the three levels of classification, structure and syntactic function of the 674 nature adjectives in the outline of the New HSK Vocabulary. This paper is divided into three parts, the specific contents are as follows: the first part: the classification of Chinese-Burmese adjectives. The second part: contrast the structure of Chinese and Burmese adjectives. The third part: contrasts the syntactic function of Chinese and Burmese adjectives, as attributive, predicate, adverbial, complement and subject object.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.2;H421
本文编号：2302367
[Abstract]:Vocabulary is one of the important factors in a language, among which adjectives are more active in Chinese and Myanmar languages. This paper makes a contrastive study of Chinese and Myanmar adjectives. Although Chinese and Burmese belong to different language types, there must be similarities and differences between them. In this paper, the author makes a comparative study of the two languages at the three levels of classification, structure and syntactic function of the 674 nature adjectives in the outline of the New HSK Vocabulary. This paper is divided into three parts, the specific contents are as follows: the first part: the classification of Chinese-Burmese adjectives. The second part: contrast the structure of Chinese and Burmese adjectives. The third part: contrasts the syntactic function of Chinese and Burmese adjectives, as attributive, predicate, adverbial, complement and subject object.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.2;H421
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 刘春霞;;性质形容词与状态形容词的异同[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2009年05期
2 张国宪;;性质形容词重论[J];世界汉语教学;2006年01期
3 沈家煊;;形容词句法功能的标记模式[J];中国语文;1997年04期
4 刘松汉;形容词作状语、补语情况再考察[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);1990年01期
5 史有为;性质形容词和状态形容词琐议[J];汉语学习;1984年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 李春艳;汉韩态度类形容词对比研究[D];延边大学;2012年
2 王青华;现代汉语缅甸语形容词重叠式比较研究[D];云南大学;2012年
3 温馨;新HSK中近义性质形容词的研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2012年
4 黄晓晔;性质形容词作状语的句法现象研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
5 严买买;汉英反义形容词对比研究[D];云南师范大学;2007年
6 王跟国;句法位置对性质形容词的句法语义特征的制约[D];山西大学;2006年
，本文编号：2302367
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2302367.html
