汉语量词“张”的去范畴化研究
[Abstract]:Quantifier is a special part of speech in Chinese and Tibetan languages, which is active in people's daily communication and literary works with its vividness and vividness. Generally, quantifiers follow numerals to form quantitative structures to modify nouns to express quantitative meanings. However, in some cases, quantifiers appear non-quantifier expression, no longer have the characteristics of typical quantifiers. The theory of de-categorization is a dynamic study of unconventional phenomena in language. The non-classifier expression of classifier is the result of decategorization. Previous researches on quantifiers are mainly static description, but little attention has been paid to the dynamic development of quantifiers. As we all know, languages are constantly changing, so it is not enough to focus on their static features and regular usage. However, for the theory of de-categorization, most scholars apply it to the study of the phenomenon of decategorization of nouns and verbs, and few scholars combine it with the study of quantifiers. Therefore, this paper applies the theory of de-categorization to the study of classifiers, and tries to systematically analyze the syntactic distribution characteristics, functional changes and semantic changes of quantifiers after the phenomenon of de-categorization, in order to have a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic development of quantifiers. The quantifier "Zhang" often appears in literary works and daily communication, and it is representative and convenient to study in the corpus. Therefore, this paper takes the quantifier "Zhang" as the object of study to investigate the phenomenon of de-categorization of the quantifier "Zhang". All the entries with "Zhang" in the corpus are used as the corpus data in this study. The author finds out the non-quantifier usage of quantifiers by processing the corpus and marking the parts of speech, and combines qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis to analyze the syntactic distribution of classifiers, respectively. The functional and semantic aspects of the detailed study. With the help of de-categorization and its related theories, this study finds that the classifier "Zhang" is different in the process of de-categorization. In some cases, the quantifier is completely de-categorized into a new category, while in some cases, the quantifier is still in the middle state of de-categorization, that is, it does not completely lose the original category characteristics but has some attributes of other categories. Secondly, in the syntactic distribution, the prototype syntactic distribution features of the classifier "Zhang" can be expanded to form a new noun with the noun morpheme, or the verb can be modified with the numeral "one" and reduplicated. They can also be followed by prepositions to define verbs and form a new adjective with adjective morphemes. Thirdly, on the functional level, the author analyzes the syntactic function and semantic function. From the perspective of syntactic function, the decategorization quantifier "Zhang" is extended from the original attributive position to the position of affix, adverbial and object, and the attributive function is weakened after the adjective morpheme. In the position of affix, only has the grammatical function. In terms of semantic function, the classifier "Zhang" extends the function of statement and reference from the original function of non-declarative and non-referential. The way in which a verb acts when it has a declarative function similar to a nomenclature. Finally, in the semantic change, the quantifier "Zhang" will have semantic loss, semantic transfer and semantic abstraction generalization. The systematic analysis of syntactic distribution, function and semantics enables readers to have a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamic development of quantifiers and to better grasp the development and changes of language.
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H146.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 宗守云;;范畴化理论与四个世界理论[J];毕节学院学报;2008年06期
2 于艳;陈全献;;探究去范畴化的定义[J];科技信息;2009年02期
3 罗建平;;语言非范畴化理论简述及讨论[J];广东石油化工学院学报;2011年02期
4 贾志高,程杰;隐喻语言中的范畴化[J];山东师大外国语学院学报;2000年02期
5 刘润清,刘正光;名词非范畴化的特征[J];语言教学与研究;2004年03期
6 陈建生;杨玉娟;;词义的范畴化与非范畴化[J];长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
7 张士奇;;模糊语言与原型范畴化理论[J];科技信息(科学教研);2008年14期
8 王莉;;限制性和非限制性关系分句使用规律的次范畴化研究[J];长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
9 梅晴;;诌议语言的范畴化及其过程[J];读与写(教育教学刊);2010年07期
10 齐红霞;谢勇;;名词的功能游移是名词非范畴化的结果[J];兰州教育学院学报;2010年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 宗守云;;范畴化理论与四个世界理论[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
2 黄伟红;;类典型论,范畴化和词义扩展[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
3 陆红艳;;非范畴化视角下的多义性分析[A];首届海峡两岸外语教学与研究学术研讨会暨福建省外国语文学会2011年会论文集[C];2011年
4 韩习武;王金勇;;汉英动词次范畴化对应关系的形式描写[A];黑龙江省计算机学会2009年学术交流年会论文集[C];2010年
5 韩习武;刘春阳;;汉语动词次范畴化的形式描写[A];黑龙江省计算机学会2009年学术交流年会论文集[C];2010年
6 ;A Boundary based Classifier Combination Method[A];2009中国控制与决策会议论文集(3)[C];2009年
7 程飞雄;李卫华;唐峗;;In silPrediction of Cytochrome P450 Inhibition and Inhibitory Promiscuity:Towards an Understanding of Chemical Promiscuity[A];第十一届全国计算(机)化学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2011年
8 ;Impact of the Size of Training Set on Text Categorization[A];第三届学生计算语言学研讨会论文集[C];2006年
9 ;A New Measure of Diversity for Classifier fusion Based on Fuzzy Integrals[A];2011年全国电子信息技术与应用学术会议论文集[C];2011年
10 Mok Hingtung;;Fault Diagnosis Based on Knowledge Extracted from Neurofuzzy Networks Using Binary and Real-Valued Fault Databases[A];第二十七届中国控制会议论文集[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 陈勇;汉语数量范畴及其非范畴化研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
2 陈伟;范畴化理论中几个问题的研究[D];华南理工大学;2014年
3 HAZRAT ALI;基于深度学习模型的说话人识别算法研究[D];北京科技大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 何梅;汉语量词“张”的去范畴化研究[D];贵州大学;2017年
2 刘昭;《汉俄大词典》单字条目词类标注实证研究[D];四川外国语大学;2015年
3 郭建强;范畴化理论在高中英语词汇教学中的实证研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2015年
4 张海宁;范畴化理论在高中英语词汇教学中的实证研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年
5 沈丽双;中国日报中名词非范畴化现象的研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年
6 赵璐;《论语》中“仁”的认知语言学研究[D];西南大学;2016年
7 韩秋静;基于范畴化理论的初中英语词汇教学研究[D];青海师范大学;2016年
8 张丽晶;基于基本范畴化理论的教学方法对初中生英语词汇习得影响研究[D];扬州大学;2016年
9 崔璨;基于范畴化理论的高中英语词汇教学研究[D];延安大学;2016年
10 宋琦;“七A八B”的非范畴化数词分析[D];长沙理工大学;2015年
,本文编号:2345133
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2345133.html