“打折”的统一:中国国语运动中的“不统一主义”
发布时间：2019-01-21 19:33
【摘要】：中国近代国语运动在致力于"语言统一"的同时,也对统一"过度"的危险抱有深刻警惕,因而明确将"不统一主义"定为国语运动的宗旨之一,在整个世界范围内的语言民族主义潮流中都别具特色。"不统一主义"具体表现在两个方面:一是力倡保护方言,反对国语一统天下;二是主张"蓝青官话"式的国语标准,不要求每个人都说得字正腔圆。造成国语运动这一特色的原因不止一个,既和国语运动领袖们的自由主义思想倾向有关,也和中国文化和社会传统本身对于地方性的宽容和高度赞许有关。这一特色提醒我们,中国近代的民族国家建设在走向权力集中化的同时,还存在着"疏松统一"的可能。
[Abstract]:While devoting itself to "linguistic unification", the modern Chinese national language movement was also deeply alert to the danger of "excessive" unification, so it explicitly set "disunity doctrine" as one of the aims of the national language movement. The trend of language nationalism throughout the world is unique. " Disunity is manifested in two aspects: one is to advocate the protection of dialects and oppose the domination of Mandarin, the other is to advocate the standard of "blue and green mandarin", which does not require everyone to speak correctly and roundly. There are more than one reason for this feature of the Mandarin Movement, not only because of the liberal ideological tendency of the leaders of the Mandarin Movement, but also because of the local tolerance and high praise of the Chinese culture and social tradition itself. This feature reminds us that the nation-state construction in modern China has the possibility of "loose unification" while it moves towards the centralization of power.
【作者单位】： 四川大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：H1-09
，
本文编号：2412967
[Abstract]:While devoting itself to "linguistic unification", the modern Chinese national language movement was also deeply alert to the danger of "excessive" unification, so it explicitly set "disunity doctrine" as one of the aims of the national language movement. The trend of language nationalism throughout the world is unique. " Disunity is manifested in two aspects: one is to advocate the protection of dialects and oppose the domination of Mandarin, the other is to advocate the standard of "blue and green mandarin", which does not require everyone to speak correctly and roundly. There are more than one reason for this feature of the Mandarin Movement, not only because of the liberal ideological tendency of the leaders of the Mandarin Movement, but also because of the local tolerance and high praise of the Chinese culture and social tradition itself. This feature reminds us that the nation-state construction in modern China has the possibility of "loose unification" while it moves towards the centralization of power.
【作者单位】： 四川大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：H1-09
，
本文编号：2412967
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2412967.html
