不同性质汉语隐喻句认知加工的fMRI研究

发布时间：2019-03-05 14:41

【摘要】：有关隐喻认知研究的一个核心问题是:隐喻加工机制与一般言语理解相比是否具有独特性以及隐喻理解伴随的神经生理机制是否有其独特的模式?对此问题的回答需要对隐喻性质进行区分。常见的熟悉隐喻可进一步区分为词源性隐喻与引发性隐喻,其中词源性隐喻的隐喻义属于词语多个词义中的一个延伸义,而引发性隐喻则是将两个分属于不同概念领域的概念进行非字面的语义联结。词源性隐喻句和引发性隐喻句的理解包含了与一般语义句理解不同的加工内容。相比一般句,词源性隐喻句特异性地激活了与语义竞争相关的左侧颞中回、颞上回以及与加工深度有关的额下回,而引发性隐喻句则在左侧额下回有更多激活。隐喻的内在加工过程和神经机制并不单一,探讨隐喻理解与一般语义理解的异同需要考虑具体的隐喻性质。
[Abstract]:One of the core issues in metaphorical cognitive studies is whether the metaphorical processing mechanism is unique compared with general speech comprehension and whether there is a unique pattern of neurophysiological mechanisms associated with metaphorical understanding. The answers to this question need to distinguish the metaphorical nature. Familiar metaphors can be further divided into etymological metaphors and induced metaphors, in which the metaphorical meanings of etymological metaphors belong to one of the extended meanings of multiple lexical meanings. Elicited metaphor is a non-literal semantic association of two concepts that belong to different conceptual domains. The comprehension of etymological metaphorical sentence and elicited metaphorical sentence contains different processing content from that of general semantic sentence. Etymological metaphorical sentences specifically activate the left middle temporal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus and subfrontal gyrus related to processing depth, while metaphorical sentences are more active in the left inferior frontal gyrus. The inherent processing process and neural mechanism of metaphor are not single. It is necessary to consider the specific metaphorical nature to explore the similarities and differences between metaphorical understanding and general semantic understanding.
【作者单位】：郑州大学教育系;华南师范大学心理学院;河南省人民医院影像科;复旦大学心理学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(14ZDB155) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC190014) 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2015CYY023)
【分类号】：H0-05

【相似文献】