语段理论框架下对名词性词组形容词的句法研究
发布时间：2019-03-29 19:39
【摘要】：本文在语段理论框架下,对名词性词组中形容词的句法进行分析研究。文章旨在研究形容词的几个经典问题,包括形容词的分类,句法地位,以及名词性词组中形容词在语段理论下的推导。本文认同Scott(2002)的研究,认为形容词是与其语义相对应的功能词的标志语。同时,基于Cinque(1995)的研究,文中将名词性词组中的形容词分成三类,分别是主题形容词、属性形容词和谓语形容词。主题形容词和属性形容词的基本位置均在名词之前,而谓语形容词的基本位置在名词和补语之后。主题形容词充当名词的标志语,属性形容词充当与其语义相对应的功能词的标志语,谓语形容词是谓语功能词的标志语。在生成语法近期的理论发展阶段,人们已经认识到了分句和名词短语之间的平行关系。Svenonius(2003)认为,QP和nP是名词短语里的两个语段。在Svenonius(2003)研究的基础上,本文支持DP和nP是名词短语中的两个语段这一主张。同时,与分句相对应,名词词组中的功能词应该得到进一步的研究。本文设想:与属性形容词语义想对应的功能词,存在于名词性词组之中,位于名词之前,限定词之后;功能词FagrN存在于名词性词组之中,并且会触发名词的左向移动;功能词Fpred也存在于名词性词组中,充当谓语形容词的中心语;名词性词组中,功能词的模式为Op*--[D—K—Num*--[n—Fadj1—FagrN—Fadj2—N—Fpred.本文认同Cinque(1995)的观点,认为在不同语言的名词性词组中,名词的左向移动,是解释形容词不同表层位置的原因。本文指出,普遍特征F存在于功能词FagrN中,在不同的语言中,普遍特征F有不同的参数表现形式。在某种语言中,如果特征F在中心语FagrN中,是一个强特征,其特征F将会触发名词的左向移动。然而,如果特征F在中心语FagrN中,是一个弱特征,特征F则不能触发名词的左向移动。最后,本文对汉语和其他几种语言进行分析,以期能在语段框架下,对名词性词组中的形容词做初步的探讨,起到抛砖引玉的作用。然而,生成语法终究是一门很深的学问,在有限的篇幅中,仍有许多问题没有能够涉及或解决,还需要深入探讨和研究。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the syntactic analysis of adjectives in nominal phrases is carried out within the framework of segment theory. The purpose of this paper is to study several classical problems of adjectives, including the classification of adjectives, their syntactic status, and the derivation of adjectives in nominal phrases from the perspective of segment theory. This paper agrees with Scott (2002) and holds that adjectives are the markers of functional words corresponding to their semantics. At the same time, based on the research of Cinque (1995), the adjectives in nominal phrases are divided into three categories: subject adjectives, attribute adjectives and predicate adjectives. The basic positions of subject adjectives and attribute adjectives are before nouns, while the basic positions of predicate adjectives follow nouns and complements. Subject adjectives act as markers of nouns, attribute adjectives act as markers of functional words corresponding to their semantics, and predicate adjectives are markers of predicate functional words. In the recent theoretical development stage of generative grammar, people have realized the parallel relationship between clause and noun phrase. Venonius (2003) thinks that QP and nP are two segments in noun phrase. On the basis of Svenonius (2003), this paper supports the idea that DP and nP are two segments in noun phrases. At the same time, corresponding to clauses, the functional words in noun phrases should be further studied. This paper assumes that the functional words corresponding to the semantic thinking of attribute adjectives exist in the nominal phrase, in front of the noun, after the qualifier, the functional word FagrN exists in the nominal phrase, and will trigger the left-hand movement of the noun. The function word Fpred also exists in the nominal phrase, acting as the center of the predicate adjective; in the nominal phrase, the functional word pattern is Op*-- [D\ x {# * $} Fadj1\' This paper agrees with Cinque (1995) that the left-hand movement of nouns is the reason for explaining the different surface positions of adjectives in nominal phrases of different languages. In this paper, it is pointed out that the universal feature F exists in the functional word FagrN. In different languages, the universal feature F has different parametric forms. In a language, if the feature F is a strong feature in the central language FagrN, its feature F will trigger the left-hand movement of the noun. However, if the feature F is a weak feature in the central language FagrN, the feature F cannot trigger the left-hand movement of the noun. Finally, this paper analyzes Chinese and several other languages in order to make a preliminary discussion of adjectives in nominal phrases within the framework of a segment, and play a role of leading to jade in nominative phrases. However, generative grammar is a deep knowledge after all. In the limited space, there are still many problems that can not be dealt with or solved, which still need to be discussed and studied in depth.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H146.3
本文编号：2449821
[Abstract]:In this paper, the syntactic analysis of adjectives in nominal phrases is carried out within the framework of segment theory. The purpose of this paper is to study several classical problems of adjectives, including the classification of adjectives, their syntactic status, and the derivation of adjectives in nominal phrases from the perspective of segment theory. This paper agrees with Scott (2002) and holds that adjectives are the markers of functional words corresponding to their semantics. At the same time, based on the research of Cinque (1995), the adjectives in nominal phrases are divided into three categories: subject adjectives, attribute adjectives and predicate adjectives. The basic positions of subject adjectives and attribute adjectives are before nouns, while the basic positions of predicate adjectives follow nouns and complements. Subject adjectives act as markers of nouns, attribute adjectives act as markers of functional words corresponding to their semantics, and predicate adjectives are markers of predicate functional words. In the recent theoretical development stage of generative grammar, people have realized the parallel relationship between clause and noun phrase. Venonius (2003) thinks that QP and nP are two segments in noun phrase. On the basis of Svenonius (2003), this paper supports the idea that DP and nP are two segments in noun phrases. At the same time, corresponding to clauses, the functional words in noun phrases should be further studied. This paper assumes that the functional words corresponding to the semantic thinking of attribute adjectives exist in the nominal phrase, in front of the noun, after the qualifier, the functional word FagrN exists in the nominal phrase, and will trigger the left-hand movement of the noun. The function word Fpred also exists in the nominal phrase, acting as the center of the predicate adjective; in the nominal phrase, the functional word pattern is Op*-- [D\ x {# * $} Fadj1\' This paper agrees with Cinque (1995) that the left-hand movement of nouns is the reason for explaining the different surface positions of adjectives in nominal phrases of different languages. In this paper, it is pointed out that the universal feature F exists in the functional word FagrN. In different languages, the universal feature F has different parametric forms. In a language, if the feature F is a strong feature in the central language FagrN, its feature F will trigger the left-hand movement of the noun. However, if the feature F is a weak feature in the central language FagrN, the feature F cannot trigger the left-hand movement of the noun. Finally, this paper analyzes Chinese and several other languages in order to make a preliminary discussion of adjectives in nominal phrases within the framework of a segment, and play a role of leading to jade in nominative phrases. However, generative grammar is a deep knowledge after all. In the limited space, there are still many problems that can not be dealt with or solved, which still need to be discussed and studied in depth.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H146.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 本刊编辑部;;致读者[J];文献;1985年04期
2 巴彦;;“及”,“以及”[J];语文学习;1980年07期
3 李凤恩;秦万生;;“恣君之所使之”中“所”字之浅见[J];语文学习;1987年02期
4 王德纯;;古汉语“省文”例释[J];语文教学通讯;1983年11期
5 张晓峰;;轮机英语名词性词组语义和搭配分析[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
6 孙海晨;英语名词性词组在汉译英中的运用[J];中国翻译;1998年05期
7 周笃宝;科技英语名词性词组的理解与翻译[J];中国科技翻译;2000年02期
8 孟庆伦;;古汉语判断句琐谈[J];商丘师专学报(社会科学版);1985年01期
9 胡光斌;“为了”介连两属说质疑[J];贵州文史丛刊;1997年02期
10 史锡尧;;“的”字词组初探[J];语文学习;1980年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 张锦笙;;语言符号“之”字新探[A];逻辑今探——中国逻辑学会第五次代表大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C];1996年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 陆舒敏;语段理论框架下对名词性词组形容词的句法研究[D];华南理工大学;2016年
2 DAO THI HA NINH（陶氏河宁）;对N/NP+L中L的考察[D];北京语言文化大学;2000年
，本文编号：2449821
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2449821.html
