概念整合理论对反语的阐释力

发布时间：2021-03-04 08:28

　　反语是日常交流中普遍使用的语言现象。由于其独特性和普遍性,受到了众多学者的关注。一开始,研究者们从修辞角度研究反语,后来逐渐扩展到心理学和语言学特别是认知语言学领域。现代语言学的各个分支从多角度全方位地审视该语言现象,探讨反语的概念及生成、理解机制。然而由于上述研究的缺陷及反语的复杂性,它们都无法全面解释反语实时意义建构过程。概念整合理论的核心概念是概念整合网络。概念整合网络的基本模型包括四个心理空间：两个输入空间,类属空间和合成空间。本研究采取了定性分析方法。在对搜集到的语料进行筛选和分类之后,建立不同类型的概念整合网络,两个输入空间内的部分元素形成跨空间映射,并且选择性投射到合成空间中,使得合成空间具有输入空间中不具备的新元素。在合成空间的完善过程中,借助于背景框架可以得出输入空间之间的矛盾。在对合成空间进行运演的过程中,输入空间的投射元素重新建构,最终演绎出反语意义。本研究发现镜像网络、单域网络和双域网络对反语实时意义建构过程具有强大的阐释力。将该理论应用于反语分析,为反语研究提供了一种新的视角。此外,将该理论应用于自然语言话语分析可以从总体上检验其阐释力,发现其优点和不足,强化... 

【文章来源】：南京师范大学江苏省 211工程院校

【文章页数】：53 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Origin and Development of the Research into Irony
    1.2 Classification of Irony
        1.2.1 Verbal Irony
        1.2.2 Situational Irony
        1.2.3 Structural Irony
    1.3 Motivation of the Research
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Rhetorical Approaches to Irony
    2.3 Semantic Approaches to Irony
    2.4 Pragmatic Approaches to Irony
        2.4.1 Grice's Violation-Based View
        2.4.2 Leech's Politeness Principle
    2.5 Cognitive Approaches to Irony
        2.5.1 Attardo's Relevant Inappropriateness
        2.5.2 Sperber & Wilson's Echoic Mention Theory
        2.5.3 Clark & Gerrig's Pretense Theory
        2.5.4 Utsumi's Implicit Display Theory
    2.6 Limitations of the Previous Studies
    2.7 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundations
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 The Development of Conceptual Integration Theory
    3.3 The Network Model of Conceptual Integration
    3.4 Optimality Principles of Conceptual Integration Network
        3.4.1 Integration
        3.4.2 Topology
        3.4.3 Web
        3.4.4 Unpacking
        3.4.5 Good reason
    3.5 Types of Conceptual Integration Network
        3.5.1 Simplex Network
        3.5.2 Mirror Network
        3.5.3 Single-Scope Network
        3.5.4 Double-Scope Network
    3.6 Summary
Chapter Four Irony Analyses Based on Conceptual Integration Theory
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Requisite Factors in Irony Comprehension
        4.2.1 Essential Abilities of the Hearer
            4.2.1.1 Language Ability
            4.2.1.2 Memory
            4.2.1.3 Associative Thinking
            4.2.1.4 Inferring Ability
        4.2.2 Shared Background Knowledge
        4.2.3 Context
    4.3 Meaning Construction in Cognitive Linguistics
    4.4 Meaning Construction of Irony in CIN
        4.4.1 Irony in Mirror Network
        4.4.2 Irony in Single-Scope Network
        4.4.3 Irony in Double-Scope Network
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Major Findings of the Research
    5.2 Limitations of the Research and Further Study
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
在读期间发表的学术论文及研究成果


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION[J]. Gilles Fauconnier.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2003(02)

硕士论文
[1]Fauconnier的概念整合理论及其在二语教学中的应用[D]. 沈莉.南京师范大学 2004



本文编号：3062897