汉英选择疑问句的构式研究
发布时间：2021-04-17 23:05
本文以构式语法理论为指导,对汉英选择疑问句形式与意义之间的对应关系进行了尝试性的分析,主要对汉英选择疑问构式的句法关系、语义限制和语用功能进行了研究。选择疑问句,顾名思义,是疑问句的一种,指的是提出并列的两项或两项以上的选择项以让对方从中选择。夸克认为,这种疑问句不及特殊疑问句和一般疑问句地位高,尽管如此,许多前辈们在研究选择疑问句方面做出了巨大贡献。很多国内学者对选择疑问句的句法结构、范围界定、疑问焦点、语用功能进行了大量的描写、解释和研究,但是仍有一些关于英汉选择疑问构式的问题没有触及或解决：其一是关于选择疑问构式的语法本质问题,语言学家们对选择疑问句范围的界定还没有达成共识。大家对于汉语的正反问是不是属于选择疑问句一直有争议；第二就是关于什么样的词语或短语能够进入这个构式。西方学者很重视选择疑问句的句法结构研究,然而却忽略了选择项之间的句法关系和语义关系。本文将运用构式语法理论解决这两个问题。构式语法,是基于认知语言学的一种新的理论方法,在解释和理解语言本质方面有其不同的方式。构式是形式和意义的结合体,包括词素、词语、还有俗语,可以是词汇的也可以是关于语言句式的。本文运用构式语法...
【文章来源】：湖南师范大学湖南省 211工程院校
【文章页数】：101 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
0.1 The Motivation of the Study
0.2 The Scope of the Study
0.3 The Significance of the Study
0.4 The Organization of the Thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Previous Studies of Chinese Alternative Questions
1.1.1 Syntactic Structures
1.1.2 Scope of Alternative Questions
1.1.3 Interrogative Focus
1.1.4 Functions of Alternative Questions
1.2 Previous Studies on English Alternative Questions
1.3 Summary
Chapter Two Theoretical Foundation
2.1 Constructions in Constuction Grammar
2.2 Construction Grammar
2.2.1 Kay and Fillmore's View on Construction Grammar
2.2.2 Goldberg's View on Construction Grammar
2.2.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Construction Grammar
2.3 Summary
Chapter Three The Syntactic Relations of Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
3.1 Composition of Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Construction
3.1.1 Composition of Chinese Alternative Interrogation Construction
3.1.2 Composition of English Alternative Interrogation Construction
3.1.3 Relations between Alternative Questions and Yes-on Questions
3.1.4 Relations between Alternative Questions and Wh-Questions
3.2 The Contrast between Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
3.2.1 Similarities
3.2.2 Differences
3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Semantic Studies on Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
4.1 Construction Meaning
4.1.1 Sense of Removing Doubt
4.1.2 Sense of Asking in Retort
4.2 Semantic Constraints on Alternatives
4.2.1 Contrastive Relations
4.2.2 Generic Relations
4.2.3 Compatible Relations
4.3 Alternative Questions and Chinese A-not-A Questions
4.3.1 The Nature of Chinese A-not-A Questions
4.3.2 The Relationship between Alternative Questions and Chinese A-not-A Questions
4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Pragmatic Functions of Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
5.1 Interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions
5.1.1 Interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions based on Yes-no Questions
5.1.2 Interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions based on Wh-questions
5.2 Non-interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions
5.2.1 Full Negation
5.2.2 Negation of the Forward Alternative X
5.2.3 Negation of Backward Interrogative Y
5.3 Position of the Alternatives
5.3.1 Position of Alternatives in Interrogative Functions
5.3.2 Position of Alternatives in Non-interrogative Functions
5.4 Summary
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix
Acknowledgements
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]构式语法——现代语言学发展的新动向[J]. 李玉辉. 中北大学学报(社会科学版). 2010(01)
[2]用构式语法研究“爱V不V”结构[J]. 丁加勇,易磊. 云梦学刊. 2009(06)
[3]汉英疑问句对比分类研究[J]. 崔岩. 吉林省教育学院学报(学科版). 2009(03)
[4]“V归V”句式的句法、语义、语用分析[J]. 钟雪君. 语言与翻译. 2009(01)
[5]现代汉语疑问句的语义与逻辑分析[J]. 吴早生. 河西学院学报. 2008(04)
[6]选择型反问句考察[J]. 殷树林. 淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版). 2008(03)
[7]构式语法及其对语言习得和教学的启示[J]. 李璐. 江西教育学院学报(社会科学). 2006(05)
[8]列项选择问的选肢论域[J]. 丁力. 陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版). 2006(03)
[9]构式语法论要[J]. 严辰松. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2006(04)
[10]列项选择问中的三种管控现象[J]. 丁力. 汉语学报. 2005(02)
博士论文
[1]英汉疑问句类型学比较研究[D]. 王瑞昀.上海外国语大学 2005
[2]相信和怀疑：附加疑问句认知研究[D]. 牛保义.河南大学 2002
硕士论文
[1]选择疑问句的历时研究[D]. 相玉玲.苏州大学 2008
[2]现代汉语疑问句语用研究[D]. 谭轶操.延边大学 2007
[3]特殊疑问句的认知研究[D]. 胡燕慈.河南大学 2007
[4]英语多元Wh-问句优先效应的优选论阐释[D]. 刘存伟.西南大学 2006
本文编号：3144300
【文章来源】：湖南师范大学湖南省 211工程院校
【文章页数】：101 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
0.1 The Motivation of the Study
0.2 The Scope of the Study
0.3 The Significance of the Study
0.4 The Organization of the Thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Previous Studies of Chinese Alternative Questions
1.1.1 Syntactic Structures
1.1.2 Scope of Alternative Questions
1.1.3 Interrogative Focus
1.1.4 Functions of Alternative Questions
1.2 Previous Studies on English Alternative Questions
1.3 Summary
Chapter Two Theoretical Foundation
2.1 Constructions in Constuction Grammar
2.2 Construction Grammar
2.2.1 Kay and Fillmore's View on Construction Grammar
2.2.2 Goldberg's View on Construction Grammar
2.2.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Construction Grammar
2.3 Summary
Chapter Three The Syntactic Relations of Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
3.1 Composition of Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Construction
3.1.1 Composition of Chinese Alternative Interrogation Construction
3.1.2 Composition of English Alternative Interrogation Construction
3.1.3 Relations between Alternative Questions and Yes-on Questions
3.1.4 Relations between Alternative Questions and Wh-Questions
3.2 The Contrast between Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
3.2.1 Similarities
3.2.2 Differences
3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Semantic Studies on Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
4.1 Construction Meaning
4.1.1 Sense of Removing Doubt
4.1.2 Sense of Asking in Retort
4.2 Semantic Constraints on Alternatives
4.2.1 Contrastive Relations
4.2.2 Generic Relations
4.2.3 Compatible Relations
4.3 Alternative Questions and Chinese A-not-A Questions
4.3.1 The Nature of Chinese A-not-A Questions
4.3.2 The Relationship between Alternative Questions and Chinese A-not-A Questions
4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Pragmatic Functions of Chinese and English Alternative Interrogation Constructions
5.1 Interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions
5.1.1 Interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions based on Yes-no Questions
5.1.2 Interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions based on Wh-questions
5.2 Non-interrogative Functions of Alternative Questions
5.2.1 Full Negation
5.2.2 Negation of the Forward Alternative X
5.2.3 Negation of Backward Interrogative Y
5.3 Position of the Alternatives
5.3.1 Position of Alternatives in Interrogative Functions
5.3.2 Position of Alternatives in Non-interrogative Functions
5.4 Summary
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix
Acknowledgements
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]构式语法——现代语言学发展的新动向[J]. 李玉辉. 中北大学学报(社会科学版). 2010(01)
[2]用构式语法研究“爱V不V”结构[J]. 丁加勇,易磊. 云梦学刊. 2009(06)
[3]汉英疑问句对比分类研究[J]. 崔岩. 吉林省教育学院学报(学科版). 2009(03)
[4]“V归V”句式的句法、语义、语用分析[J]. 钟雪君. 语言与翻译. 2009(01)
[5]现代汉语疑问句的语义与逻辑分析[J]. 吴早生. 河西学院学报. 2008(04)
[6]选择型反问句考察[J]. 殷树林. 淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版). 2008(03)
[7]构式语法及其对语言习得和教学的启示[J]. 李璐. 江西教育学院学报(社会科学). 2006(05)
[8]列项选择问的选肢论域[J]. 丁力. 陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版). 2006(03)
[9]构式语法论要[J]. 严辰松. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2006(04)
[10]列项选择问中的三种管控现象[J]. 丁力. 汉语学报. 2005(02)
博士论文
[1]英汉疑问句类型学比较研究[D]. 王瑞昀.上海外国语大学 2005
[2]相信和怀疑：附加疑问句认知研究[D]. 牛保义.河南大学 2002
硕士论文
[1]选择疑问句的历时研究[D]. 相玉玲.苏州大学 2008
[2]现代汉语疑问句语用研究[D]. 谭轶操.延边大学 2007
[3]特殊疑问句的认知研究[D]. 胡燕慈.河南大学 2007
[4]英语多元Wh-问句优先效应的优选论阐释[D]. 刘存伟.西南大学 2006
本文编号：3144300
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/3144300.html
