基于MF模型的“X就是任性”汉语构式研究

发布时间：2017-09-20 19:23

本文关键词：基于MF模型的“X就是任性”汉语构式研究

【摘要】：最近网络上流行“有钱就是任性”这一说法,并由其衍生出“年轻就是任性”,“漂亮就是任性”等,共同构成“X就是任性”家族。但是语言学界对此构式尚没有详细的论述和语料分析,现有理论也不能很好地解释该构式。为了弥补这一空缺,本文在认知语言学(包括构式语法)视角下探究网络构式“X就是任性”的生成机制。我们整合“多重传承观”(Multiple Inheritance)和“图形—背景观”(Figure-Ground),创建MF模型,发现该构式家族的生成分为两步,首先是“有钱就是任性”同时传承于汉语“有钱”、“任性”、“‘就是’—加强肯定”构式和“因果构式”,并加以整合突显“有钱”这一事件原因;然后网友们在具体语境中模仿套用该构式,并在图形—背景观的作用下,分离出事件某一要素替换“有钱”,使其得到突显,此类构式的生成都受到了“有钱就是任性”构式直接或间接的压制。该类构式的意义为:突显事件某一要素,评价该事件或现象为“任性”,根据具体语境分别表达批评、讽刺、调侃、自嘲、炫耀、幽默等语用效果。我们还从百度、凤凰、新浪、新华网上收集到368条语料建立封闭语料库,以佐证本研究。本文共由五个章节构成。第一章为绪论,包括选题动机、研究目的、研究范围、数据收集、方法论及全文布局。第二章为文献综述,从词法、心理学、文化、认知语言学视角回顾了前人对网络新词的研究,并指出其不足之处。第三章为理论框架,将“多重传承观”和“图形—背景观”整合为MF模型,并以其为理论基础分析“X就是任性”。第四章为语料分析,结合MF模型详述该构式句法、语义、语用三个方面的特征,并辅以具体的语料和数据作为支撑。第五章为结语,总结本文的贡献和不足之处。贡献可归纳为如下三点:1、整合出新的MF模型来解释构式“X就是任性”的生成机制,是创新所在;2、首次详细、系统地分析了新兴网络构式“X就是任性”,弥补了空缺;3、首次自建语料库来支持理论。本文还存在如下两点不足之处:1、理论模型尚不够完善;2、语料收集不具有穷尽性。
【关键词】：多重传承观 图形—背景 网络新词 “X就是任性”
【学位授予单位】：四川外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H146.3
【目录】：

摘要4-5
Abstract5-7
Acknowledgements7-12
Chapter One Introduction12-17
1.1 Motivation and Purpose12-13
1.2 Research Scope13-14
1.3 Methodology and Data Collection14-15
1.4 Layout of the Thesis15-17
Chapter Two Literature Review17-29
2.1 Introduction17
2.2 Previous Studies on Novel Cyber Expressions17-25
2.2.1 Lexical Approach18-21
2.2.2 Cultural and Psychological Approach21-23
2.2.3 Cognitive Approach23-25
2.3 Previous Studies on the Novel Construction“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”25-27
2.4 The Gap of the Previous Studies27-28
2.5 Summary28-29
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework: MF Model29-54
3.1 Introduction29
3.2 Theoretical Basis29-44
3.2.1 “X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”as a Construction29-33
3.2.1.1 Definition of Construction29-32
3.2.1.2 “X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”as a Construction32-33
3.2.2 Multiple Inheritance in Cognitive Construction Grammar33-38
3.2.2.1 Complete Inheritance34-35
3.2.2.2 Partial Inheritance35-37
3.2.2.3 Multiple Inheritance37-38
3.2.3 Figure-Ground Theory in Cognitive Linguistics38-44
3.2.3.1 The Birth of Figure-Ground Theory39-40
3.2.3.2 The Differences between Figure and Ground40-42
3.2.3.3 Figure-Ground Theory and Linguistics42-44
3.3 Theoretical Integration: MF Model44-51
3.3.1 Necessity for MF Model44-46
3.3.1.1 The Limitations of Multiple Mode Inheritance44-45
3.3.1.2 The limitations of Figure-Ground Theory45-46
3.3.2 Rationale for the Combination of Multiple Inheritance and Figure-Ground Theory46-47
3.3.3 MF Model47-51
3.4 A Case Study51-53
3.5 Summary53-54
Chapter Four Data Analysis and Discussion54-82
4.1 Introduction54
4.2 Data Description54-56
4.2.1 Data Collection54-55
4.2.2 Data Classification55-56
4.3 Data Analysis and Discussion via MF Model56-80
4.3.1 The Syntactic Features of“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”Construction57-66
4.3.1.1 Syntactic categories of “X”57-62
4.3.1.2 Syntactic Function of“Jiù Shì”62-63
4.3.1.3 The Syntactic Function of“Rèn Xìng”63
4.3.1.4 The Syntactic Structures of“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”63-64
4.3.1.5 Syntactic Uses of“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”64-66
4.3.2 The Semantic Features of“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”Construction66-78
4.3.2.1 Figure Equals Cause67-69
4.3.2.2 Figure Equals Subject69-74
4.3.2.3 Figure Equals Result74-76
4.3.2.4 Figure Equals Activity76-77
4.3.2.5 The Construction Meaning of“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”77-78
4.3.3 The Pragmatic Features of“X Jiù Shì Rèn Xìng”Construction78-80
4.3.3.1 Pragmatic Effects78-79
4.3.3.2 Application and Function79-80
4.3.3.3 Psychological Factors of Construction Users80
4.4 Summary80-82
Chapter Five Conclusion82-85
5.1 A Brief Summary of the Research82
5.2 Main Findings and Contributions82-83
5.3 Limitations and Suggestions83-85
References85-88
Appendix88-100