《埃涅阿斯记》乐观与悲观之争

发布时间：2018-01-13 20:26

  本文关键词：《埃涅阿斯记》乐观与悲观之争　出处：《史林》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 维吉尔 奥古斯都 乐观 悲观 欧洲学派 哈佛学派

【摘要】：《埃涅阿斯记》乐观与悲观之争堪称20世纪"维吉尔学"两大阵营的世纪之争,即欧洲学派的传统乐观解读,遭到美国哈佛学派的悲观解构。学者们围绕维吉尔创作的目的乃颂奥古斯都震古铄今之举,或哀其功成骨枯之本进行讨论,进而引发对《埃涅阿斯记》史诗或悲剧属种,以及维吉尔是否奥古斯都政治上的拥趸等一系列问题的探讨。笔者意对此二学派论点和方法进行对比分析,以究二者聚讼之焦点,并表达对欧洲学派的支持。
[Abstract]:The controversy between optimism and pessimism can be regarded as the century dispute between the two camps of Virgil Studies in 20th century, that is, the traditional optimistic interpretation of the European School. By the American Harvard school of pessimism deconstructed. Scholars around Virgil's purpose is to eulogize Augustus earthquake to the present, or to mourn its success to the root of the discussion. Then it leads to a series of questions about the epic or tragic genera and species of Aeneas and whether Virgil is a political supporter of Augustus. The author intends to make a comparative analysis of the arguments and methods of these two schools of thought. In order to investigate the focus of litigation between the two, and express their support for the European school.
【作者单位】： 爱尔兰都柏林大学古典系;
【分类号】：K126;I106.2
【正文快照】： 《埃涅阿斯记》乃维吉尔为罗马民族撰写的炳炳p鷓，

本文编号：1420410