内藤湖南《燕山楚水》笔谈资料整理与研究

发布时间：2018-03-02 01:08

本文关键词： 内藤湖南《燕山楚水》笔谈　出处：《浙江工商大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：内藤湖南作为憧憬中国传统文化、对中国关注颇多的日本著名的中国学学者,其先后多次中国行为日本带回了大量珍贵书籍、史料甚至情报信息等,同时也为后世留下了诸多的“旅行记”,这些纪行文不仅作为文学作品传于世,其中包含了大量的史料信息,也为后世研究当时的中日两国的交往特别是其中文人知识分子的交往以及中日文化的交流提供了不可多得的资料。本文正文主要分为三个部分：第一章主要内藤湖南生平及其首次中国行归国后所写纪行文《燕山楚水》的简介,旨在厘清其首次中国行的游踪脉络,梳理出《燕山楚水》第一部分“禹域鸿爪记”中的相关笔谈文献资料。第二章主要对《燕山楚水》中同内藤湖南笔谈的对象进行分类介绍。从中可见与内藤笔谈的或是当时的中上层知识分子或是当时政界的要人,这与内藤此次中国行的主要目的之一——探察中国时局密切相关。第三章主要就笔谈内容特别是原稿内容进行具体分析。通过比较分析内藤文库发现的笔谈原稿这一第一手资料与博文馆1900年版《燕山楚水》——内藤归国后不久变整理出版纪行文与中译本的《燕山楚水》的异同,探知《燕山楚水》中关于笔谈部分的记录在多大程度上忠实于笔谈原稿,其中的中译本作为第三手资料是否能够接近于著者的真实的意思表达及其与笔谈原稿的差距。内藤湖南作为京都学派的创始人之一,其提倡原典实证主义的治学方法可以说始终在影响和支配着他,在整理出版纪行文时也基本是对当时情况的客观描述,而对笔谈部分的记述更是如此,基本保全了笔谈的原貌,这一点也是后辈学者应该学习并努力做到的。正是内藤的这一精神才使得后世能够在没有亲临笔谈现场的情况下能够在史料的帮助下想象笔谈的现场,不能不说是一份宝贵的财富。当然,其中不乏内藤主观的感情的因素存在,使其在看待某些问题时站在民族本位的立场上发表看法。
[Abstract]:As a famous Japanese scholar of Chinese studies looking forward to Chinese traditional culture and paying much attention to China, Hunan Neito has successively brought back a large number of precious books, historical materials and even information information about China's behavior. At the same time, many "travel notes" have been left for later generations, which are not only handed down as literary works, but also contain a great deal of historical information. It also provides rare information for the later generations to study the exchanges between China and Japan, especially the communication between literati and intellectuals and the exchange of Chinese and Japanese culture. This text is divided into three parts: chapter one is mainly about Neito. A brief introduction to Hunan's life and the book "Yanshan Chushui" written after the return of China for the first time, To clarify the itinerary of his first trip to China, The first part of "Yuyu Hongclaw" is combed out the related literature and materials. The second chapter mainly introduces the objects of the "Yanshan Chushui" with Neito Hunan pen. From which we can see the pen talk with Neito. At that time, the upper-middle class intellectuals or the political figures of that time, This is closely related to one of the main purposes of Neito's trip to China-to explore the current situation in China. Chapter three mainly focuses on the specific analysis of the contents of the written remarks, especially the contents of the original manuscripts. A firsthand report and the 1900 edition of "Yanshan Chushui" by the Bowen Museum-soon after Neito returned to China, he changed and sorted out the similarities and differences between the published writings and the Chinese translation of "Yanshan Chushui". To find out the extent to which the record of the written part of "Yanshan Chushui" is faithful to the original manuscript, Whether the Chinese translation, as the third hand, can approach the author's true meaning expression and the gap between the Chinese version and the written manuscript. Neito Hunan, as one of the founders of the Kyoto School, His scholarly method of advocating positivism of the original code can be said to have always influenced and dominated him, and it is also basically an objective description of the situation at that time when sorting out the writing of the publication book, and this is especially true of the part of the written discourse, which basically preserves the original appearance of the written discourse. This is what later generations of scholars should learn and try to do. It is Nido's spirit that has enabled future generations to imagine pen talks without the help of historical data. Of course, there are many factors of Nito's subjective feelings, which make him express his views on the national standard when looking at some problems.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：I313.06

【共引文献】