个性化的集体记忆—巴伦特与多多中早期诗歌中互通的诗艺

发布时间：2018-03-15 04:33

本文选题：何塞·安赫尔·巴伦特　切入点：多多　出处：《上海外国语大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本论文以西班牙诗人何塞·安赫尔·巴伦特(Joséángel Valente)的中早期诗歌全集《零点:诗歌1953-1979》(Punto cero:poesía,1953-1979)和中国诗人多多(原名栗世征)的中早期诗歌为研究对象,从诗歌结构、诗歌语词和诗歌画面与音乐三方面结合符号学和陌生化理论进行剖析,试图阐明二者互通的诗艺所展现的个性化的集体记忆。论文正文分为四个章节。第一章简要介绍诗歌语料的概况及国内外研究现状,并引入比较文学、符号学和陌生化理论的理论框架。第二章主要分析诗歌结构层面上的陌生化,以“支离破碎的语言”为切入点探讨陌生的美感。二者的诗歌语言之所以不可模仿正在于其对文本的“分解”处理以及对修辞手法的重组和创新。第三章我们从“词”的角度进行分析,试图阐明二者诗歌中“概念和物质的陌生化”。第一部分我们从名词这一宽泛的概念入手,第二部分则相对具化,探析“把言语带向零点的词”这一概念在二者诗歌中的体现以及“自然元素”和“动物”这些语象的变形和重生。第四章从诗歌的画面感和音乐感为切入点论证二者的诗歌并不完全是个人化的,若把诗歌作为整体去感受,我们也能够接近“词”的本质,“恢复”集体的记忆。此处我们所指的“集体记忆”不仅仅是关于战争和革命的记忆,同时也包括我们对日常生活的体验和对外部世界的感知。最后我们总结全文,并结合上述各章的论述阐明本文的观点:巴伦特和多多的诗歌中“陌生”与“非陌生”,“个性化”与“集体化”共存。正因为此两位诗人带给我们的是真正持久的美学享受。在认识到两者诗歌创作的特点之后我们可以更为自由地在诗歌的国界间穿行,体会“词”之真义,感受诗歌内部的韵律。1981年诺贝尔文学奖得主埃利亚斯·卡内蒂(Elias Canetti)曾如此评价诗歌:“诗是一只陌生的动物,我们无法一眼看清它的完整形态。对诗的解说是一个牢笼,但它从来就不在里面。”(Valente,2007:19)我们不可能以此文彻底展现巴伦特和多多诗歌的全貌,也并不试图达到这一目的。我们“对诗的解说”旨在追随这只“陌生动物”的脚步,寻找靠近它的方式,从而得以静心端详它的面貌。
[Abstract]:This thesis focuses on the early poetry of Jos 茅谩 ngel Valente by Jos 茅谩 ngel Valente, a Spanish poet, from the structure of poetry, from the poetry structure of the middle and early periods of poetry by the Spanish poet Jos 茅谩 ngel Valente, and the Chinese poet Dodou (formerly known as Li Shizheng), from the perspective of the early poetry < 00:00: poetry 1953-1979 > Punto cero:poes 铆 aqu 茅 1953-1979) and the Chinese poet Dodou (formerly known as Li Shizheng). Combining the semiotics and the theory of defamiliarization with the three aspects of poetry words, poetic pictures and music, The paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter briefly introduces the general situation of poetry corpus and the current research situation at home and abroad, and introduces comparative literature. The second chapter mainly analyzes the defamiliarization of poetry on the structural level. From the point of view of "fragmented language", we discuss the strange aesthetic feeling. The reason why the poetic language of the two cannot be imitated lies in their "decomposition" of the text and the reorganization and innovation of the rhetoric. In chapter three, we begin with. From the perspective of "words", In the first part, we start with the broad concept of noun, and the second part is relatively characterized. This paper explores the embodiment of the concept of "bringing speech to the 00:00 word" in their poems and the transformation and rebirth of the "natural elements" and "animals". Chapter 4th demonstrates from the perspective of the poetic sense of picture and the sense of music. Their poems are not entirely personal. If we feel poetry as a whole, we can also approach the essence of "words", "restore" collective memory. We mean "collective memory" not only about war and revolution, It also includes our experience of daily life and our perception of the outside world. And with the above chapters of the discussion to clarify the point of view of this article: Barendt and Dodo's poetry "strange" and "no stranger", "individuation" and "collectivization" coexistence. Precisely because these two poets bring us is really lasting. Aesthetic enjoyment. After recognizing the characteristics of their poetic creation, we can travel more freely between the boundaries of poetry, Understand the true meaning of "ci" and feel the rhythm of poetry. In 1981, Nobel Prize winner Elias Canetti commented on poetry as follows: "Poetry is a strange animal. We can't see it in its full form at a glance. The interpretation of poetry is a cage, but it's never inside. "Valentele 2007: 19. We do not try to achieve this goal either. Our interpretation of poetry aims to follow in the footsteps of this strange animal and to find ways to approach it so that we can meditate on its face.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I106.2

【参考文献】