文学全球化的“不明地带”（英文）

发布时间：2018-04-26 12:41

  本文选题：全球化 + 创伤群系　； 参考：《外国文学研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：近代以来,西方文学与文化作为全球化进程的组成部分,其活跃程度与日俱增,而如何面对这一状况却尚未解决。这一问题,就其承载者而言,无疑有着可喜的一面,而对其受施者来说又有其创伤的一面,这就使得全球化要么作为西方强权自上而下地强制实施的一项策略性工程,要么促成生长于底层的属地自发地联合起来。第一种殖民性的全球化模式以自内而外的联结方式导致各个属地之间的断裂,而后殖民全球化模式则将各个属地联结起来以改变被强加在头上的全球格局。我在拙作《追寻全球民主:文学、理论、创伤政治》一书中已就第一种模式的相关问题进行了探讨,所以本文聚焦于上述第二种模式,这一模式强调文学作品不可缺省的差异性以抵制第一种模式所强调的受市场驱动的共同特征。本文认为第二种模式源于创伤研究与记忆研究交汇之处的跨学科领域,随着艾米丽·阿普特在其《反对世界文学》一书中宣扬"不可互译的"诸多世界文学所具有的丰富性而达到顶峰。本文经过批判性审视,发现这一模式脱离了文学的非归属性,正如第一种模式不假思索地脱离了文学的归属性一样,因而本文提出了一种替代模式,这一模式脱离"创伤群集"而成为一个兼具归属性和非归属性的文学作品的诞生地。
[Abstract]:Since modern times, as a part of the process of globalization, western literature and culture have been active in the process of globalization, but how to face this situation has not yet been solved. This question, for its bearer, has a gratifying side and a traumatic side for its recipients, which makes globalization either as a western power. A strategic project enforced from top to bottom either contributes to the spontaneous union of the ground floor territories. The first colonial globalization model leads to the breakage between the territories from an internal to external connection, while the colonial globalization model joins each of the territories in order to change the force imposed on the head. The global pattern. I have explored the issues related to the first model in my book on Global Democracy: literature, theory, and trauma politics. So this article focuses on the second models above, which emphasizes the inevitable differences in literary works to resist the common characteristics of the market driven by the first model. This paper argues that the second models originate in the interdisciplinary field of the intersection of trauma research and memory research, reaching the peak with the richness of Emily and Apte in his book "against world literature", which proclaims the richness of many world literature which cannot be translated from each other. Attribution, as the first model unconsciously divorced from the ascription of literature, this paper proposes an alternative model, which is divorced from the "cluster of trauma" and becomes the birthplace of a literary work of both belonging and non belonging.

【作者单位】： 奥地利维也纳大学;欧洲科学院;
【分类号】：I106
，

本文编号：1806067