后现代主义语境下知人论世的存活与当代西方文论的挑战

发布时间：2018-05-18 23:35

本文选题：知人论世 + 当代西方文论　；参考：《学术论坛》2017年04期

【摘要】：知人论世是中国古代文论中最具指南性的理论命题之一,它长期存活却习焉不察。知人论世以人为核心,意谓一切作品皆源于人在特定历史时期与具体时空中的创作,了解作者本人以及所处的社会环境,才能深度解读其作品。知人论世将世界、作者、作品三者联系起来,从人学与史学的双重维度观照文学活动,确有真知灼见。但知人论世的弊端在于过多强化作者的中心地位,而漠视作品本身的内在结构。在后现代主义语境下,知人论世正面临着当代西方话语的挑战。西方形式主义、新批评、现象学、阐释学等强调文本的独立自足性,接受美学则提倡开放的、创造性的阅读,确有合理的内核,但完全割裂作品与作者、社会的关系,无疑是非理性的。如何推阐知人论世的内涵,使之真正获得当代存活的意义,拥有中国文论话语权,是一个亟待探讨的理论问题。
[Abstract]:Knowing the world is one of the most guiding theoretical propositions in ancient Chinese literary theory. It means that all works originate from the creation of human beings in a specific historical period and time and space. Only by understanding the author himself and his social environment can he interpret his works in depth. Understanding the world, author, and works connect the world, the author and the works, and reflect the literary activities from the dual dimensions of human studies and historiography. However, the disadvantage of understanding the world lies in the too much strengthening of the central position of the author and the disregard of the internal structure of the work itself. In the context of post-modernism, understanding the world is facing the challenge of contemporary western discourse. Western formalism, new criticism, phenomenology and hermeneutics emphasize the independence and self-sufficiency of the text, while receptive aesthetics advocates open and creative reading, which has a reasonable core, but completely separates the relationship between the work and the author and society. There is no doubt that it is irrational. It is an urgent theoretical problem to explain the connotation of understanding the world and make it truly acquire the meaning of contemporary survival and have the right to speak in Chinese literary theory.
【作者单位】：扬州大学文学院;
【分类号】：I106

【相似文献】