从真理的剧场到治理的剧场:福柯对《俄狄浦斯王》的解读

发布时间：2018-05-19 16:44

本文选题：《俄狄浦斯王》 + 海德格尔　；参考：《文艺研究》2017年10期

【摘要】：在西方文化史中,对戏剧《俄狄浦斯王》的文化—社会意义阐释以精神分析学说中的"俄狄浦斯情结"广为人知。但是,自亚里士多德开始,哲学家对《俄狄浦斯王》的解释更重视真理、伦理规范和戏剧情节的复杂关系,这条解释线索由尼采和海德格尔发扬光大,并由米歇尔·福柯继承下来。福柯继承尼采和海德格尔的问题意识,并在20世纪70年代的《俄狄浦斯王》阐释中,批判海德格尔将该剧解释为"表象"和"存在之真理"之间的斗争悲剧的解释框架,强调俄狄浦斯王作为挑衅性知识的追求者,对西方社会权力—知识共谋关系的批判和冲击的积极价值。20世纪80年代初,福柯再一次解释《俄狄浦斯王》,修改以前的解释框架,认为俄狄浦斯对城邦权力秩序的挑衅,已经成为城邦秩序的共谋行为,而整个戏剧也不再是真理的剧场,而是制造真理以维护政治秩序的治理剧场。
[Abstract]:In the history of western culture, the interpretation of the cultural and social significance of the drama < the Oedipus King > is well known by the "Oedipus complex" in psychoanalysis. However, since Aristotle, the philosopher's interpretation of Oedipus is more concerned with the truth, the ethical norms and the complex relationship between the drama and the drama festival, which is from Nietzsche and Heidegger carries forward and is inherited by Michel Volker. Foucault inherits the problem consciousness of Nietzsche and Heidegger, and in the interpretation of Oedipus' king in 1970s, criticizes Heidegger to interpret the play as the framework of the tragedy between "appearance" and "the truth of existence", emphasizing the provocative nature of Oedipus king. The purer of knowledge, the positive value of criticism and impact on western social power - knowledge conspiracy, Foucault once again explained "Oedipus king" at the beginning of the 80s of the.20 century, and revised the previous interpretation framework. The provocation of Oedipus' provocation to the power order of the city states has become a conspiracy of the city state order, and the whole drama is no longer the same. The theatre of truth is a governance theatre that creates truth and maintains political order.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学比较文学与世界文学研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“文化诗学视域下的21世纪西方文论思潮研究”(批准号:16 JJD750010)成果
【分类号】：I545.073

【相似文献】