沉默之声:从动物诗看默温的生态伦理结和诗学伦理结之解

发布时间：2018-06-23 21:39

本文选题：默温 + 动物诗　；参考：《外国文学研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：哈罗德·布鲁姆曾经批评默温的早期诗作徒有末日之忧而不具超验之明。本文聚焦默温的动物诗,通过梳理贯穿默温创作生涯的生态和诗学两条伦理主线及相应的生态和诗学两个伦理结先后形成、消解和统一的完整历程,指出默温在生态伦理上所持的生态整体立场与布鲁姆"有益于人类"的伦理出发点不同。在诗学伦理上,默温坚持诗歌是见证的艺术,诗歌形式是对一种听见当下生命经历的方式的见证。而默温一以贯之的诗艺探索和实践恰也见证了默温一生对人类破坏力的深刻反思、对自然世界绝对存在的笃信不疑、对诗歌艺术召唤沉默之声的毕生追求、以及诗内诗外知行合一的伦理操守。
[Abstract]:Harold Bloom criticized Merwin's early poems as apocalyptic. This paper focuses on Merwin's animal poems, and through combing the two ethical lines of ecology and poetics, and the corresponding ethics of ecology and poetics, forms, dissolves and unifies the complete course of Merwin's writing career. It is pointed out that Merwin's ecological holistic stand on ecological ethics is different from Bloom's ethical starting point of "beneficial to mankind". In poetical ethics, Merwin insists that poetry is the art of witnessing, and poetry is a testimony to the way one hears the experience of life. And Merwin's continuous poetic exploration and practice witnessed his deep reflection on the destructive power of human beings throughout his life, his deep belief in the absolute existence of the natural world, and his lifelong pursuit of the sound of poetic art calling for silence. As well as the poetry inside and outside the knowledge and conduct of the ethical integrity.
【作者单位】：苏州大学外国语学院;华东政法大学外语学院;苏州大学;
【基金】：教育部人文社科规划项目“美国自然诗歌的主题嬗变及其生态诗学思想的构建”【项目批号:15YJA752024】江苏省社科项目“生态批评视域中的美国自然诗流变研究”【项目批号:13WWB003】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I712.072

【相似文献】