中西叙事传统比较论纲

发布时间：2018-06-26 00:40

本文选题：中西 + 叙事传统　；参考：《学术论坛》2017年02期

【摘要】：传统的一个重要意义在于其形成于过去却不断作用于现在,比较中西双方的叙事传统,根本目的还是为了深化对自己一方的认识。要想真正懂得中华民族的叙事传统,不能只作自己一方的研究,还需要将其与域外的叙事传统相互映发。这项工作的意义在于光大中国叙事传统,更具体地说旨在纠正20世纪初以来低估本土叙事的偏见。叙事传统是文化的重要组成部分,通过比较中国人和西方人的讲故事方式,中西文化的特点、规律和异同必将更为清晰地显露出来。由于西方文化在较长时期内处于"放送"影响的上风地位,采取比较视角的研究很容易发生立场转移,因此需要注意在放眼全球时坚守中国立场。但在反对"自我东方化"的同时也要防止"自我中心"作祟,后者在很大程度上妨碍了比较文学的发展。一时代有一时代之学术,没有走向全面复兴的时代大潮,没有历史创伤的痊愈和文化自信的恢复,就不会有中西叙事传统比较这样的研究应运而生。
[Abstract]:One of the important meanings of tradition is that it was formed in the past but acted continuously in the present. The basic purpose of comparing the narrative tradition between China and the West is to deepen the understanding of one side of oneself. If we want to really understand the narrative tradition of the Chinese nation, we should not only study it on our own side, but also reflect it with the foreign narrative tradition. The significance of this work lies in Everbright Chinese narrative tradition, more specifically aimed at correcting the bias of undervaluing native narratives since the beginning of the 20th century. Narrative tradition is an important part of culture. By comparing Chinese and Western storytelling methods, the characteristics, laws and similarities and differences of Chinese and Western cultures will be more clearly revealed. Because the western culture is in the upper position of the influence of "release" for a long time, it is easy to take a comparative perspective to study the position shift, so it is necessary to pay attention to the Chinese position when looking at the whole world. But it is necessary to prevent egocentrism, which hinders the development of comparative literature to a great extent. Without the recovery of historical trauma and the restoration of cultural self-confidence, there would be no such research as the comparison of Chinese and Western narrative traditions.
【作者单位】：江西师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中西叙事传统比较研究”(16ZDA195)
【分类号】：I106

【相似文献】