中西文论中“神思”与“想象”的比较及会通

发布时间：2018-06-26 09:07

本文选题：神思 + 想象　；参考：《探索与争鸣》2017年01期

【摘要】：神思与想象(imagination)是中西文论关于文学创作中作家的思维特征和艺术构思与表达方式的两个关键词:"神思"属于中国文论,"想象(imagination)"属于西方文论。无论是"神思"还是"想象(imagination)",都脱胎于它们各自的文化母体,均有历史悠久的发展演变过程,凝炼浓缩了丰富多样的文学创作经验与艺术精神,并且在理论批评方面留下了清晰可辨的实践轨迹,故而承载着丰厚的文化内涵与美学意蕴。"神思"与"想象(imagination)"既有相异之处,亦有相通之处。我们可以从关键词比较研究的视角,梳理两者的流变过程,分析它们的相异、相通之处,并且揭示它们在当下文化语境中所存在的会通与功能激活之可能性与路径。同时,当下文学创作和理论批评要向"神思""想象(imagination)"所提供的经典文学精神学习,以批判矫正那些已经畸形、病变了的文学想象观。
[Abstract]:(imagination) of deity and imagination is the two key words of Chinese and Western literary theories about the writer's thinking characteristics and artistic conception and expression in literary creation: "Divine thought" belongs to Chinese literary theory and "imagine (imagination)" belongs to western literary theory. Both "deity" and "imagination (imagination)" are born out of their respective cultural parent bodies and have a long history of development and evolution, condensing rich and diverse literary creation experience and artistic spirit. And in the theoretical criticism left a clear and discernible track of practice, so it carries rich cultural connotation and aesthetic meaning. " There are differences and similarities between Deity and Imagination (imagination). From the perspective of the comparative study of keywords, we can sort out the process of their evolution, analyze their differences and similarities, and reveal the possibility and path of their communication and functional activation in the present cultural context. At the same time, contemporary literary creation and theoretical criticism should learn from the classical literary spirit provided by "Divinity" and "Imagination (imagination)" in order to criticize and correct the already deformed and diseased literary imagination.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院外国文学研究所;
【分类号】：I106

【参考文献】