史迹评骘、雄主回望与“浪漫远征”——保田与重郎《蒙疆》中的“满蒙鲜支”叙事
发布时间:2018-07-01 18:28
本文选题:保田与重郎 + 《蒙疆》 ; 参考:《外国文学评论》2017年01期
【摘要】:日本作家保田与重郎1938年的"满蒙鲜支"之旅有着强烈的政治意味。在《蒙疆》中,他拒斥关于战争的客观报道,拒绝国际联盟对侵略战争的束缚,试图通过对日本古典价值的复活、对蒙古式"原始精神"以及"日本精神"的鼓吹等来实现对西方"十九世纪"伦理的否定,但最终其"日本主义"以玄言虚语的堆砌惨淡收场。保田推崇永乐、康熙、乾隆等明清雄主纵横亚洲的开疆拓土之业,呼吁日本对中国放弃"怀柔"而采取强硬态度。在种族根性和艺术品格上,他有意掩饰日本的满蒙侵略造成中国边疆危机的历史因由,将清民之际中国政府"移民实边"的应对措施扭曲、夸大为汉族对周边少数民族的侵略,以此强化"日-满-蒙"共进退的命运连带感;同时,在文化价值上,他又为东亚诸民族做出了"日—鲜/满/蒙—汉"的层级划分,贬低近代中国而抬高日本本土以及满、蒙、鲜等殖民地或亲日傀儡政权地区的文化价值。这种致力于建构"中心的塌陷和周边的隆起"的东亚文化层级的话语行为与战争时期日本"去中心的中心化"的思想建构以及"大东亚新秩序"的政治战略构成了一种相互支撑的关系。
[Abstract]:Japanese writer Po Tian and Chun Lang's trip to Manchuria Xianzhi in 1938 had strong political implications. In Mongol, he rejects the objective report of the war, rejects the League of Nations' bondage to the war of aggression, and attempts to revive the classical values of Japan. The preaching of Mongolian "primitive spirit" and "Japanese spirit" to realize the negation of the western "nineteenth century" ethics, but finally its "Japanism" ended in a dismal heap of metaphysical words. Baotian praised Yongle, Kangxi, Qianlong and other Ming and Qing Dynasty masters to open up the territory of Asia, calling on Japan to give up "Huairou" and take a tough attitude towards China. In terms of his ethnic roots and artistic character, he deliberately concealed the historical cause of the crisis in China's frontier caused by the Japanese invasion of Manchu and Mongolia, distorted the response of the Chinese government to "emigrating to the real border" during the Qing Dynasty, and exaggerated the Han nationality's aggression against the surrounding ethnic minorities. In this way, he strengthened the sense of conjunctive fate of "Japanese-Manchury-Mongol," and at the same time, in terms of cultural values, he divided the "Japanese-fresh / Manchu / Mongolian-Han" hierarchy for the peoples of East Asia, thereby devaluing modern China and elevating Japan's native land and Manchu. Cultural values of colonial or pro-Japanese puppet regimes in Mongolia and other countries. This kind of discourse behavior at East Asian cultural level devoted to the construction of "the collapse of the center and the uplift of the periphery" and the ideological construction of the "decentralization" of Japan during the war and the political strategic composition of the "New order of Greater East Asia" A mutually supportive relationship.
【作者单位】: 复旦大学外文学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金重大项目“‘东方学’体系构建与中国的东方学研究”(14ZD083)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:I313.06
,
本文编号:2088680
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2088680.html