《约翰王》的新历史主义解读
发布时间：2018-11-20 09:46
【摘要】：《约翰王》主要讲述了金雀花王朝时期约翰王与亚瑟王子之间争夺英格兰王位的故事。本文运用斯蒂芬·格林布拉特的社会能量说对《约翰王》中不同社会能量如宗教、主权和阶级参与之间的协商进行分析,试图证明《约翰王》的写作参与了伊丽莎白一世时期有关英国民族主权国家的政治争论。本文由导论、主体和结论三部分构成。导论部分介绍了《约翰王》的内容、研究状况、以及本文拟运用的理论基础。主体部分从三个方面对本文论点进行详细论述。第一章分析了《约翰王》中宗教能量的协商。莎士比亚对该剧的改编既保留了约翰王的新教英雄形象,又呈现了约翰王对天主教的屈服。这种看似不明朗的宗教态度实则是受到从国家利益出发的民族意识的影响而对英国国教的维护。第二章分析了《约翰王》中国家主权的协商。剧中约翰王用政治联姻和法国领土作为交换来保障他的英国国王地位,而这部分的领土丢失则实现了真正意义上的“英国”领土主权完整,英法之间的民族差异随之加强。同时,也为十六世纪加莱的失去提供了有利的辩护。而在这场王位争夺战中,约翰王与亚瑟王子所代表的英法势力也是民族身份的差异,莎士比亚通过对亚瑟势力的削弱杜绝了外国势力对英国主权的干扰。在国家内在主权方面,莎士比亚将伊丽莎白的身体政治策略纳入文本,将君主的个人身体与主权分离,服务于民族意识的散播。第三章分析了《约翰王》中不同阶级对政治生活的参与。剧中底层阶级和贵族阶级对政治生活的积极参与实际上是对现实社会中伊丽莎白一世继承人问题的指涉。莎士比亚对这场争夺战给出的解决之道是无论谁登上王位,只要有人民的忠诚爱国,英国就不可被战胜。这也是莎士比亚对当时英国王位继承人问题所持的态度。而私生子福康布里奇放弃遗产选择做一名一无所有的皇家骑士,最后一跃成为英国国王的代言人。他是中下层阶级通过将个人追求与国家命运相连而改变自身阶级地位状况的典型代表。这些都对观众的民族情怀具有巨大的催化作用。结论部分对以上分析进行总结:通过展现不同社会能量之间的协商,《约翰王》的写作参与了伊丽莎白一世时期如何将英国塑造成一个民族主权国家的政治争论,并为英国民族主权意识的形成提供了文学想象的动力。
[Abstract]:King John mainly tells the story of King John and King Arthur fighting for the throne of England during the Canary Dynasty. This paper uses Stephen Greenblatt's social energy theory to analyze the negotiation between different social energies such as religion, sovereignty and class participation in King John. Attempts to prove that King John's writing was involved in the political debate over British national sovereignty during the Elizabeth I period. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, subject and conclusion. The introduction introduces the content of King John, the research situation and the theoretical basis of this paper. The main part discusses the thesis from three aspects in detail. The first chapter analyzes the negotiation of religious energy in King John. Shakespeare's adaptation of the play not only preserves John's Protestant hero image, but also presents John's submission to Catholicism. This seemingly uncertain religious attitude is influenced by the national consciousness in the interest of the nation and maintains the Anglican Church. The second chapter analyzes the negotiation of state sovereignty in King John. In the play, King John uses political marriage and French territory as an exchange to protect his status as King of England, and the loss of this part of the territory realizes the real "British" territorial integrity, and the national differences between Britain and France are strengthened. At the same time, it also provides a favorable defense for the loss of Calais in the sixteenth century. In this battle for the throne, the British and French powers represented by King John and King Arthur were also different. Shakespeare prevented foreign powers from interfering with British sovereignty by weakening Arthur's power. In the aspect of the internal sovereignty of the state, Shakespeare incorporated Elizabeth's body politics strategy into the text, separated the monarch's body from sovereignty, and served the dissemination of national consciousness. The third chapter analyzes the participation of different classes in the political life in King John. The active participation of the lower class and the aristocratic class in the political life in the play is in fact a reference to the question of Elizabeth I's successor in the real society. Shakespeare's solution to the battle was that no matter who ascended to the throne, England could not be defeated with the loyalty and patriotism of the people. This was Shakespeare's attitude to the question of the heir to the British throne at that time. His illegitimate son, Foucambridge, gave up his legacy and chose to be a dispossessed royal knight, and finally became the voice of the British king. He is a typical representative of the middle-and lower-class changing their class status by connecting the individual pursuit with the destiny of the country. These are the audience's national feelings have a huge catalytic role. The conclusion part summarizes the above analysis: by showing the negotiation between different social energies, King John's writing is involved in the political debate about how Elizabeth I shaped Britain as a national sovereign state. It provides the motive force of literary imagination for the formation of British national sovereignty consciousness.
【学位授予单位】：四川外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I561.073
本文编号：2344573
[Abstract]:King John mainly tells the story of King John and King Arthur fighting for the throne of England during the Canary Dynasty. This paper uses Stephen Greenblatt's social energy theory to analyze the negotiation between different social energies such as religion, sovereignty and class participation in King John. Attempts to prove that King John's writing was involved in the political debate over British national sovereignty during the Elizabeth I period. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, subject and conclusion. The introduction introduces the content of King John, the research situation and the theoretical basis of this paper. The main part discusses the thesis from three aspects in detail. The first chapter analyzes the negotiation of religious energy in King John. Shakespeare's adaptation of the play not only preserves John's Protestant hero image, but also presents John's submission to Catholicism. This seemingly uncertain religious attitude is influenced by the national consciousness in the interest of the nation and maintains the Anglican Church. The second chapter analyzes the negotiation of state sovereignty in King John. In the play, King John uses political marriage and French territory as an exchange to protect his status as King of England, and the loss of this part of the territory realizes the real "British" territorial integrity, and the national differences between Britain and France are strengthened. At the same time, it also provides a favorable defense for the loss of Calais in the sixteenth century. In this battle for the throne, the British and French powers represented by King John and King Arthur were also different. Shakespeare prevented foreign powers from interfering with British sovereignty by weakening Arthur's power. In the aspect of the internal sovereignty of the state, Shakespeare incorporated Elizabeth's body politics strategy into the text, separated the monarch's body from sovereignty, and served the dissemination of national consciousness. The third chapter analyzes the participation of different classes in the political life in King John. The active participation of the lower class and the aristocratic class in the political life in the play is in fact a reference to the question of Elizabeth I's successor in the real society. Shakespeare's solution to the battle was that no matter who ascended to the throne, England could not be defeated with the loyalty and patriotism of the people. This was Shakespeare's attitude to the question of the heir to the British throne at that time. His illegitimate son, Foucambridge, gave up his legacy and chose to be a dispossessed royal knight, and finally became the voice of the British king. He is a typical representative of the middle-and lower-class changing their class status by connecting the individual pursuit with the destiny of the country. These are the audience's national feelings have a huge catalytic role. The conclusion part summarizes the above analysis: by showing the negotiation between different social energies, King John's writing is involved in the political debate about how Elizabeth I shaped Britain as a national sovereign state. It provides the motive force of literary imagination for the formation of British national sovereignty consciousness.
【学位授予单位】：四川外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I561.073
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 ;新闻[J];看历史;2012年03期
2 易家言;李斌;;疯狂,灭亡的奏鸣曲[J];学理论;1995年04期
3 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2344573
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2344573.html
