严歌苓与纳博科夫小说创作比较研究
发布时间：2019-04-28 15:02
【摘要】：近年来,严歌苓、纳博科夫小说创作研究得到广泛的关注,但缺乏对二者的比较研究。基于此,本文将通过细读他们的作品,具体从叙事策略、创作主题、语言风格三个方面来分析他们在小说创作上的异同,以及严歌苓在小说创作方面对纳博科夫的学习和借鉴。因为这不仅有助于开拓我国当代文学研究的比较视域,还有助于了解我国当代作家自身的创作特点以及受外国文学影响的因素。本文共分三章。第一章主要分析严歌苓与纳博科夫在小说创作中使用叙事策略的异同。在元叙事方面,他们都喜欢在叙述中告诉读者作品是虚构的,都喜欢采用故事套故事的手法,不同的是严歌苓在叙述中喜欢把自己的主观意志强加在人物身上,有卖弄技巧之嫌;在影像化叙事中,他们都喜欢描写人物的动作、视觉化的场景和人物之间的对话,不过严歌苓更乐于描写人物的动作,借助动作来推进故事的发展,而纳博科夫则乐于描写环境、人物心理;在拼贴叙事方面,他们在进行主观化阐释和评论的同时,不断拼贴故事场景,使人物穿梭在过去、现在、将来;而在细节化方面,他们的细节描写都能让人产生以假乱真的效果。此外,严歌苓还形成了自己的叙事特色,喜欢采用多人称复合叙事和儿童叙事视角。第二章主要分析严歌苓与纳博科夫在小说创作中经常使用的叙述主题,一是流亡主题,虽然他们都有流亡经历,但接受精英教育的纳博科夫,其笔下的人物在流亡生活中是非常自信的、坚持自我的,而严歌苓笔下的人物则是以弱者的姿态、以隐忍包容的态度去接受流亡生活中的一切;二是自由主题,因为经历流亡、移民或是仅仅对理想生活的追寻,使他们迫切地追求自由,不过严歌苓所追求的自由多是物质层面的,尤其表现在她的移民作品中,而纳博科夫所追求的自由多是精神层面的;三是爱情主题,在表现这个主题的过程中严歌苓以女性为叙述主角,纳博科夫以男性为叙述主角,而且严歌苓笔下追求爱情的女性多是隐忍、包容、依附、卑微的,且缺乏女性的独立意识,而纳博科夫笔下的男性则多是强势、主动、独立的知识分子;四是人性主题,他们都喜欢通过描写小人物来表现人性的善恶,不同的是纳博科夫作品里少道德批判,对人性的思考更深刻,给读者留有的思考空间更广。第三章主要从严歌苓与纳博科夫在小说创作中的语言入手,发现严歌苓与纳博科夫都喜欢描写人物的发音方式,都擅长运用形象鲜活的比喻,而且喜欢在作品中夹杂别个国家的语言或者口语化的语言,不同的是严歌苓使用的比喻不如纳博科夫独特、鲜活,使用的别国语言也不如纳博科夫丰富,除了使用普通话外,她多使用中国本土的方言。综上所述,我们发现严歌苓在小说创作过程中无论是叙事策略,还是创作主题、语言风格,与纳博科夫都存在相似之处,但也存在很大差异,尤其是在小说创作的构思方面。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the research of Yan Geling and Nabokov's novels has received extensive attention, but the comparative study of them is lacking. Based on this, this paper will analyze their similarities and differences in novel creation from three aspects: narrative strategy, creation theme and language style, and Yan Geling's study and reference to Nabokov in the aspect of novel creation. It is not only helpful to open up the comparative field of contemporary literature research in China, but also to understand the creative characteristics of contemporary writers in China and the factors influenced by foreign literature. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter mainly analyzes the similarities and differences between Yan Geling and Nabokov's narrative strategies in their novels. In terms of meta-narrative, they all like to tell readers in their narration that their works are fictional, that they all like to adopt a storytelling technique, but that Yan Geling likes to impose his own subjective will on the characters in his narration, and the difference is that Yan Geling likes to impose his own subjective will on the characters in his narration. Have the suspicion of showing off skills; In the visual narrative, they all like to describe the movements of the characters, the visual scenes and the dialogue between the characters, but Yan Geling is more willing to describe the movements of the characters and use them to promote the development of the story. Nabokov, on the other hand, is happy to describe the environment and the psychology of the characters. In the aspect of collage narrative, while they are carrying on subjective explanation and comment, they constantly collage the story scene, make the character shuttle in the past, present, future; And in detail, their detailed description can produce false and real effect. In addition, Yan Geling also formed his own narrative characteristics, preferring to use multi-person compound narrative and children's narrative perspective. The second chapter mainly analyzes the narrative themes that Yan Geling and Nabokov often used in their novels. First, the theme of exile, although they all have exiled experiences, Nabokov, who received elite education, The characters in his works are very confident and insist on themselves in exile, while Yan Geling's characters accept everything in exile with the gesture of the weak and the attitude of tolerance. Second, the theme of freedom, because of the experience of exile, immigration or just the pursuit of an ideal life, they are eager to pursue freedom, but Yan Geling's pursuit of freedom is mostly material, especially in her immigrant works. The freedom that Nabokov pursues is mostly spiritual; Third is the love theme, in the process of expressing this theme, Yan Geling takes women as the narrative protagonists, Nabokov takes the men as the narrative protagonists, and Yan Geling writes that the women who pursue love are mostly stoic, tolerant, attached, and humble. And the lack of women's consciousness of independence, and Nabokov's men are more powerful, active, independent intellectuals; Fourth, the theme of human nature, they all like to describe small potatoes to show the good and evil of human nature, the difference is that Nabokov works less moral criticism, more profound thinking of human nature, leaving more room for readers to think. The third chapter starts with the language of Yan Geling and Nabokov in the novel creation, and finds that both Yan Geling and Nabokov like to describe the pronunciation of characters and are good at using vivid figurative metaphors. What's more, Yan Geling's metaphor is not as unique and vivid as Nabokov's, and the language used in other countries is not as rich as Nabokov's. In addition to the use of Putonghua, he also likes to incorporate the language of another country or colloquial language in his work. The metaphor used by Yan Geling is not as unique and vivid as Nabokov's. She uses more native Chinese dialects. To sum up, we find that Yan Geling is similar to Nabokov in both narrative strategy, theme, language style and Nabokov in the process of novel creation, especially in the conception of novel creation.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I712.074
本文编号：2467730
[Abstract]:In recent years, the research of Yan Geling and Nabokov's novels has received extensive attention, but the comparative study of them is lacking. Based on this, this paper will analyze their similarities and differences in novel creation from three aspects: narrative strategy, creation theme and language style, and Yan Geling's study and reference to Nabokov in the aspect of novel creation. It is not only helpful to open up the comparative field of contemporary literature research in China, but also to understand the creative characteristics of contemporary writers in China and the factors influenced by foreign literature. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter mainly analyzes the similarities and differences between Yan Geling and Nabokov's narrative strategies in their novels. In terms of meta-narrative, they all like to tell readers in their narration that their works are fictional, that they all like to adopt a storytelling technique, but that Yan Geling likes to impose his own subjective will on the characters in his narration, and the difference is that Yan Geling likes to impose his own subjective will on the characters in his narration. Have the suspicion of showing off skills; In the visual narrative, they all like to describe the movements of the characters, the visual scenes and the dialogue between the characters, but Yan Geling is more willing to describe the movements of the characters and use them to promote the development of the story. Nabokov, on the other hand, is happy to describe the environment and the psychology of the characters. In the aspect of collage narrative, while they are carrying on subjective explanation and comment, they constantly collage the story scene, make the character shuttle in the past, present, future; And in detail, their detailed description can produce false and real effect. In addition, Yan Geling also formed his own narrative characteristics, preferring to use multi-person compound narrative and children's narrative perspective. The second chapter mainly analyzes the narrative themes that Yan Geling and Nabokov often used in their novels. First, the theme of exile, although they all have exiled experiences, Nabokov, who received elite education, The characters in his works are very confident and insist on themselves in exile, while Yan Geling's characters accept everything in exile with the gesture of the weak and the attitude of tolerance. Second, the theme of freedom, because of the experience of exile, immigration or just the pursuit of an ideal life, they are eager to pursue freedom, but Yan Geling's pursuit of freedom is mostly material, especially in her immigrant works. The freedom that Nabokov pursues is mostly spiritual; Third is the love theme, in the process of expressing this theme, Yan Geling takes women as the narrative protagonists, Nabokov takes the men as the narrative protagonists, and Yan Geling writes that the women who pursue love are mostly stoic, tolerant, attached, and humble. And the lack of women's consciousness of independence, and Nabokov's men are more powerful, active, independent intellectuals; Fourth, the theme of human nature, they all like to describe small potatoes to show the good and evil of human nature, the difference is that Nabokov works less moral criticism, more profound thinking of human nature, leaving more room for readers to think. The third chapter starts with the language of Yan Geling and Nabokov in the novel creation, and finds that both Yan Geling and Nabokov like to describe the pronunciation of characters and are good at using vivid figurative metaphors. What's more, Yan Geling's metaphor is not as unique and vivid as Nabokov's, and the language used in other countries is not as rich as Nabokov's. In addition to the use of Putonghua, he also likes to incorporate the language of another country or colloquial language in his work. The metaphor used by Yan Geling is not as unique and vivid as Nabokov's. She uses more native Chinese dialects. To sum up, we find that Yan Geling is similar to Nabokov in both narrative strategy, theme, language style and Nabokov in the process of novel creation, especially in the conception of novel creation.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I712.074
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘舸;杨凤姣;;论纳博科夫对严歌苓畸恋小说创作的影响[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2016年01期
2 翟业军;鲁辰琛;;论严歌苓的极致美学及其限度[J];文艺争鸣;2015年12期
3 易崇辉;;论严歌苓雌性写作中的人类学叙事——兼论《扶桑》误读“扶桑”的缘由[J];华文文学;2015年06期
4 葛亮;严歌苓;;从写作的游牧民族到母土的《归来》[J];南方文坛;2015年01期
5 孙谦;;论严歌苓长篇小说《陆犯焉识》的空间叙事[J];北京社会科学;2014年12期
6 严歌苓;果尔;;从故事、小说到电影——严歌苓访谈[J];电影艺术;2014年04期
7 谭萍;王秀银;;《洛丽塔》,你为谁存在?——论《洛丽塔》的审美价值[J];湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年02期
8 王丹;;纳博科夫的后现代空间叙事[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2013年04期
9 熊岩;万涛;;超越“大气”,走向厚重与丰腴——严歌苓新世纪十年小说创作论[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2013年03期
10 赵艳花;;《扶桑》中的他者化华人形象与自塑形象[J];扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年05期
相关博士学位论文 前6条
1 刘红英;严歌苓小说论[D];吉林大学;2014年
2 陈学芬;自我与他者：当代美华移民小说中的中美形象[D];河南大学;2013年
3 张婷;纳博科夫英语小说的后现代性[D];东北师范大学;2011年
4 张栋辉;论严歌苓新移民小说的跨域书写[D];山东大学;2011年
5 李燕;跨文化视野下的严歌苓小说研究[D];暨南大学;2008年
6 陈晓晖;当代美国华人文学中的“她”写作：对汤亭亭、谭恩美、严歌苓等华人女作家的多面分析[D];福建师范大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李红朵;跨文化视野下的严歌苓小说人性书写研究[D];河北大学;2015年
2 甄紫涵;论纳博科夫小说艺术风格的形成[D];内蒙古师范大学;2014年
3 黄文丽;《洛丽塔》艺术表现探析[D];南昌大学;2014年
4 马勇;从严歌苓的新移民小说解析中美跨文化交际[D];厦门大学;2014年
5 王瑶;严歌苓小说主题研究[D];内蒙古大学;2013年
6 惠静;论严歌苓小说的人性书写[D];陕西师范大学;2013年
7 常溪;论严歌苓小说的影视化特质[D];山东大学;2013年
8 常慧;全球化背景下严歌苓跨文化写作研究[D];河南师范大学;2013年
9 吕强;严歌苓小说中的美国形象研究[D];温州大学;2013年
10 马萧萧;论严歌苓小说中的“洛丽塔情结”[D];暨南大学;2012年
，本文编号：2467730
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2467730.html
