努斯鲍姆“诗性正义”观及其争议辨析

发布时间：2019-07-14 11:29

【摘要】：美国学者努斯鲍姆提出"诗性正义"的命题,并论述了它的三个特征:"走向他人"的重要性、在人性上"保持丰富性"的必要性以及"诗性裁判"的可能性。她用"诗性正义"去纠正经济活动与司法活动中忽略人的情感的偏向,证明文学想象是有益于公共生活的。这一观点引发了争议,批评者认为文学的情感特性决定了它极有可能损害公共生活的公正性。笔者认为,在涉及人的生命活动时,情感的准确性往往比理性的准确性更高一级,不是情感服从理性推进了生命的发展与丰富,而是理性服从情感推进了生命的发展与丰富。文学恰恰是凭借自身对于人的生命与情感的重视而成为人类正义事业的一部分的,离开这个基点,文学便失去了作用于正义事业的有效途径与方法。
[Abstract]:American scholar Nussbaum put forward the proposition of "poetic justice" and discussed its three characteristics: the importance of "going to others", the necessity of "maintaining richness" in human nature and the possibility of "poetic judgment". She used "poetic justice" to correct the bias of neglecting human emotion in economic and judicial activities, which proved that literary imagination is beneficial to public life. This view is controversial, critics argue that the emotional nature of literature determines that it is likely to undermine the fairness of public life. The author believes that when it comes to human life activities, the accuracy of emotion is often higher than that of reason, not that emotional obedience to reason promotes the development and enrichment of life, but that rational obedience to emotion promotes the development and enrichment of life. Literature has become a part of the cause of human justice by virtue of its own attention to human life and emotion. without this basis, literature has lost the effective ways and methods to act on the cause of justice.
【作者单位】：安徽师范大学中国诗学研究中心;苏州大学文学院;
【基金】：2013年度国家社会科学基金项目《文学政治学的历史形态与当代创新研究》(13BZW002)
【分类号】：I712.06

【相似文献】