文学语用学视域下澳洲原住民作品《心中的明天》语篇分析
发布时间:2021-09-28 03:56
作为文学和语用学的交叉学科,文学语用学于20世纪90年得到国内外学者的广泛关注。文学语用学的研究涉及作者、读者、文本(语篇)和世界等因素,把作者、读者看成互动的认知主体,把文学看成言语行为,置文本意义解读于社会功能、文化含义之背景中。文学语用学融合众多理论,如合作原则、礼貌原则、关联理论、认知语境等。因此,文学语用学的出现打破了文学和语用学的分离状态,为研究文学语篇分析提供了更多的研究视角,对于语篇分析起到了推力作用。澳洲原住民语篇具有源远流长的口头叙事跳跃性大的特点,这一特点常常使得原住民文本对非原住民读者来说缺少逻辑线索,不连贯。《心中的明天》是澳洲原住民作家吉姆·斯科特的代表作之一,该作品一问世便轰动澳大利亚文坛,吉姆·斯科特也因为这部半自传小说获得了澳大利亚最高文学奖迈尔斯·富兰克林奖等多项澳大利亚文学大奖。本文以文学语用学中的认知语境、关联理论和合作原则为理论框架,运用认知语境的制约性和解释性、最大关联对时间、人称、呼语等的整合性与合作原则遵守与违背的动态性,以澳洲原住民作品《心中的明天》中的对话、自述为语篇,分析澳洲原住民的历史、文化以及认知模式在作者建构语篇中的宏观框架作...
【文章来源】:辽宁师范大学辽宁省
【文章页数】:64 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Australian Aboriginals, Kim Scott and Benang
1.2 Significance of the Study
1.3 Research Questions
1.4 Research Methodology
1.5 Thesis Organization
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Studies on Literary Pragmatics at Home and Abroad
2.1.1 International Studies on Literary Pragmatics
2.1.2 Domestic Studies on Literary Pragmatics
2.2 Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.1 Rise and the Development of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.2 Early Western Colonial Scholars’ Misreading of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.3 Contemporary Western Scholars' Interpretation of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.4 Chinese Scholars’ Interpretations of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.3 Studies on Benang at Home and Abroad
2.3.1 International Studies on Benang
2.3.2 Domestic Studies on Benang
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Introduction to Literary Pragmatics
3.2 Key Definitions in Literary Pragmatics that are Related to the Study
3.2.1 Cognitive Context
3.2.2 Relevance Theory
3.2.3 Cooperative Principle
3.3 Text Analysis
3.4 Relationship between Literary Pragmatics, Cognitive Context, Relevance Theory,Cooperative Principle and Text Analysis
Chapter 4 Text Analysis of Benang
4.1 Macroscopic Role of Australian Aboriginal History, Culture and Cognitive Mode inInterpreting Benang
4.1.1 Aboriginal History
4.1.2 Aboriginal Culture
4.1.3 Aboriginal Cognitive Mode
4.2 Language Strategies Used to Construct the Coherence of Benang from the Perspective ofRelevance Theory
4.2.1 Weakening Time
4.2.2 Alternant Uses of the Present Tense and the Past Tense
4.2.3 Uncertainty of Personal Pronouns
4.2.4 Non-equivalence of Vocative Expressions
4.2.5 Metaphorical Expressions
4.3 Textual Strategies Used in Benang to Construct the Colonial History on the Basis ofCooperative Principle in Literary Pragmatics
4.3.1 Violating the Maxim of Quality
4.3.2 Violating the Maxim of Quantity
4.3.3 Violating the Maxim of Relevance
4.3.4 Violating the Maxim of Manner
Chapter 5 Conclusion
5.1 Major Findings of the Study
5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study
References
Acknowledgements
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]《心中的明天》“梦幻”世界观解读[J]. 宫红英,冷慧. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2016(04)
[2]21世纪以来中国“文学语用学”及关联性研究[J]. 高群. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2016(02)
[3]澳洲原住民“梦幻”世界观认知模式下的名字禁忌解读[J]. 冷慧,傅轶飞,金爱晶. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2015(06)
[4]当前我国少数民族语言政策解读[J]. 黄行. 中国社会语言学. 2014(01)
[5]试从语用学角度赏析文学作品——《傲慢与偏见》的会话含意[J]. 于波. 语文学刊(外语教育教学). 2015(05)
[6]澳大利亚土著文学中的生态智慧[J]. 彭旭. 鄱阳湖学刊. 2015(01)
[7]世界观的认知机制:解读《卡彭塔利亚湾》中隐性连贯语篇现象[J]. 冷慧. 外语与外语教学. 2014(03)
[8]暴力的“礼貌原则”——福尔斯《可怜的Koko》的文学语用学解读[J]. 王卫新. 外语研究. 2012(06)
[9]发出自己的声音——澳大利亚土著女作家创作发展历程[J]. 武竞. 理论界. 2011(09)
[10]文学语用理论体系构想[J]. 涂靖. 外语学刊. 2011(02)
硕士论文
[1]白色批判:吉姆·斯科特小说中的身份解读[D]. 滕菲.苏州大学 2014
[2]在“他者”和自我之间挣扎[D]. 兰兴武.西华大学 2012
本文编号:3411195
【文章来源】:辽宁师范大学辽宁省
【文章页数】:64 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Australian Aboriginals, Kim Scott and Benang
1.2 Significance of the Study
1.3 Research Questions
1.4 Research Methodology
1.5 Thesis Organization
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Studies on Literary Pragmatics at Home and Abroad
2.1.1 International Studies on Literary Pragmatics
2.1.2 Domestic Studies on Literary Pragmatics
2.2 Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.1 Rise and the Development of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.2 Early Western Colonial Scholars’ Misreading of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.3 Contemporary Western Scholars' Interpretation of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.2.4 Chinese Scholars’ Interpretations of Australian Aboriginal Literature
2.3 Studies on Benang at Home and Abroad
2.3.1 International Studies on Benang
2.3.2 Domestic Studies on Benang
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Introduction to Literary Pragmatics
3.2 Key Definitions in Literary Pragmatics that are Related to the Study
3.2.1 Cognitive Context
3.2.2 Relevance Theory
3.2.3 Cooperative Principle
3.3 Text Analysis
3.4 Relationship between Literary Pragmatics, Cognitive Context, Relevance Theory,Cooperative Principle and Text Analysis
Chapter 4 Text Analysis of Benang
4.1 Macroscopic Role of Australian Aboriginal History, Culture and Cognitive Mode inInterpreting Benang
4.1.1 Aboriginal History
4.1.2 Aboriginal Culture
4.1.3 Aboriginal Cognitive Mode
4.2 Language Strategies Used to Construct the Coherence of Benang from the Perspective ofRelevance Theory
4.2.1 Weakening Time
4.2.2 Alternant Uses of the Present Tense and the Past Tense
4.2.3 Uncertainty of Personal Pronouns
4.2.4 Non-equivalence of Vocative Expressions
4.2.5 Metaphorical Expressions
4.3 Textual Strategies Used in Benang to Construct the Colonial History on the Basis ofCooperative Principle in Literary Pragmatics
4.3.1 Violating the Maxim of Quality
4.3.2 Violating the Maxim of Quantity
4.3.3 Violating the Maxim of Relevance
4.3.4 Violating the Maxim of Manner
Chapter 5 Conclusion
5.1 Major Findings of the Study
5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study
References
Acknowledgements
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]《心中的明天》“梦幻”世界观解读[J]. 宫红英,冷慧. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2016(04)
[2]21世纪以来中国“文学语用学”及关联性研究[J]. 高群. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2016(02)
[3]澳洲原住民“梦幻”世界观认知模式下的名字禁忌解读[J]. 冷慧,傅轶飞,金爱晶. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2015(06)
[4]当前我国少数民族语言政策解读[J]. 黄行. 中国社会语言学. 2014(01)
[5]试从语用学角度赏析文学作品——《傲慢与偏见》的会话含意[J]. 于波. 语文学刊(外语教育教学). 2015(05)
[6]澳大利亚土著文学中的生态智慧[J]. 彭旭. 鄱阳湖学刊. 2015(01)
[7]世界观的认知机制:解读《卡彭塔利亚湾》中隐性连贯语篇现象[J]. 冷慧. 外语与外语教学. 2014(03)
[8]暴力的“礼貌原则”——福尔斯《可怜的Koko》的文学语用学解读[J]. 王卫新. 外语研究. 2012(06)
[9]发出自己的声音——澳大利亚土著女作家创作发展历程[J]. 武竞. 理论界. 2011(09)
[10]文学语用理论体系构想[J]. 涂靖. 外语学刊. 2011(02)
硕士论文
[1]白色批判:吉姆·斯科特小说中的身份解读[D]. 滕菲.苏州大学 2014
[2]在“他者”和自我之间挣扎[D]. 兰兴武.西华大学 2012
本文编号:3411195
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/3411195.html