从“四不”到“二不”——探析新记《大公报》办报方针表述改变的背后

发布时间：2017-12-28 21:33

本文关键词：从“四不”到“二不”——探析新记《大公报》办报方针表述改变的背后　出处：《新闻与传播研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："不党、不卖、不私、不盲",曾被视为新记《大公报》的立报之本和成功之因,但是后来却变为"不私、不盲"。对此,大公报人在不同时期有着不同的甚至相反的认识。《大公报》是否坚持了"不党、不卖"方针?新发现的史料表明:新记《大公报》的确接受过政治津贴,也曾拥护过蒋介石和国民党政府。但这并不意味着大公报出卖了报格,更不能否认它以国家利益、民族利益作为立论的根本出发点。正是因为坚持爱国和为民说话的立场,新记《大公报》在抗战中提出"国家中心论",维护以蒋介石为中心的国民政府;也正是因为坚持这一立场,它在抗战后和国民政府逐渐疏离,提出第三条道路,在香港复刊,最终宣布新生。如果说"四不"方针是大公报人基于早期经验的总结,那么"二不"方针就是基于对日抗战及随后时局的调整。
[Abstract]:"No party, not to sell, not private, not blind", has been regarded as a new "Ta Kung Pao" the newspaper and the success of the cause, but later turned into a "private, not blind". In this regard, Ta Kung Pao people have different and even opposite understandings in different period. "Ta Kung Pao" adheres to "no party, not to sell" policy? That the newly discovered historical materials: new "Ta Kung Pao" indeed received political benefits, also had supported Jiang Jieshi and the Kuomintang government. But this does not mean that sold the newspaper Ta Kung Pao lattice, but also can not deny it to state and national interests as the fundamental starting point of argument. It is because of the motherland and the people speak position, new "Ta Kung Pao" in the proposed "National Center Theory", in order to maintain Jiang Jieshi as the center of the national government; it is also because adhere to this position, it after the war of resistance against Japan and the national government gradually alienated, put forward third roads in Hongkong reopened. Finally announced new. If the "four" principle is based on the summary of the early experience of the Ta Kung Pao people, so the "two" principle is based on the situation of the war against Japan and the subsequent adjustment.
【作者单位】：山东大学新闻传播学院;郑州大学新闻与传播学院;郑州大学穆青研究中心;
【基金】：2013年辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目“报人张季鸾研究”(项目编号:LBDXW020)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：G219.29
【正文快照】： 一、表述的转变1926年9月1日,新记《大公报》续刊,同日发表社评《本社同人之志趣》。在这篇由张季鸾执笔。并得到胡政之和吴鼎昌认同的发刊词中,提出了“不党、不卖、不私、不盲”的办报旨趣。这就是后来被称为“四不”的著名方针。作为对自身职业经历的总结,[1]“四不”被新

【相似文献】