敏感数据的定义模型与现实悖论:基于92个国家隐私相关法规以及200个数据泄露案例的分析

发布时间：2018-05-20 08:03

  本文选题：敏感数据 + 欧盟标准　； 参考：《新闻界》2017年06期

【摘要】：通过对92个国家和地区的最新隐私法规作比较分析,本文发现:1.敏感信息/数据是个人隐私与数据保护的核心,大多数国家和地区(80.34%)的法律体系中有明确定义或分类;2.这些定义或分类可概括为两种模型:"欧盟标准"和"欧盟标准加犯罪记录"。同时,本文对2004年6月至2016年6月以来中外200个规模最大的数据泄露案例作比较分析发现,财务信息等个人数据虽不在多数国家的敏感数据之列,在现实中被盗取、侵犯和泄露的风险、概率却比敏感数据更高,成为一种"现实悖论"。作者运用西方学者关于全球性的"人类尊严"和"生命神圣"等"原生规范"解释这种悖论与差异,并建议从隐私的"尊严"和"财产"双重属性视角重新定义敏感数据。
[Abstract]:Through a comparative analysis of the latest privacy laws in 92 countries and regions, this paper finds that: 1. Sensitive information / data is the core of personal privacy and data protection, and most countries and territories have clear definitions or classifications in their legal systems. These definitions or classifications can be summed up into two models: EU Standard and EU Standard plus Criminal record. At the same time, this paper makes a comparative analysis of 200 largest data leakage cases between China and foreign countries from June 2004 to June 2016. It is found that personal data, such as financial information, are stolen in reality, although they are not among the sensitive data in most countries. The risk of invasion and disclosure, however, is more likely than sensitive data, becoming a "paradox of reality". The author explains this paradox and difference by using the western scholars'"primary norms" such as "human dignity" and "sanctity of life", and suggests that sensitive data be redefined from the perspective of the dual attributes of "dignity" and "property" of privacy.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学新闻与传播学院;武汉大学媒体发展研究中心;武汉大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“一带一路倡议与跨文化传播”(16JJD860004)
【分类号】：D913;G201
，

本文编号：1913816