斯特拉顿案关于互联网规制的论争与新媒体焦虑的呈现

发布时间：2018-06-14 23:45

  本文选题：新媒体 + 互联网规制　； 参考：《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》2017年06期

【摘要】："新媒体焦虑"与技术焦虑一样,均以肯定技术改变世界的积极作用为前提,渴望自由交流,又难以承受自由交流的代价。1995年的斯特拉顿案较早地呈现了这种"新媒体焦虑",本文试图探索隐含其中的思想矛盾,以及人与技术的矛盾关系。文章发现,这种焦虑伴随着互联网的发展而蔓延,并在不同阶段呈现出特定的偏向,但不变的是焦虑的人们始终游走于自由与控制之间,试图寻求两种价值的平衡,以使技术发展真正为公共利益服务。这种以人的主体价值对抗技术的自主性的努力也确实发挥了一定的作用,影响了国家的规制活动及互联网产业自身的发展。但是,在人的思维为互联网技术所笼罩的当下,人的主体价值如何获得抵抗技术自主性的力量依然是一个问题。
[Abstract]:"New Media anxiety", like technological anxiety, presupposes the positive role of technology in changing the world and aspires to free communication. The 1995 Stratton case presented this kind of "new media anxiety" earlier. This paper tries to explore the contradiction of thought implied in it and the contradiction between human and technology. It is found that this anxiety spreads along with the development of the Internet and presents a specific bias at different stages, but what remains the same is that anxious people always walk between freedom and control in an attempt to find a balance between the two values. In order to make the development of technology really for the public interest. This kind of effort to counteract the autonomy of technology with human's main body value has played a certain role, which has affected the national regulation activities and the development of the Internet industry itself. However, at a time when people's thinking is shrouded by Internet technology, it is still a question how to obtain the power of resisting the technological autonomy of human's subject value.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学媒体发展研究中心;武汉大学新闻与传播学院;
【分类号】：G206
，

本文编号：2019515