后殖民理论语境下的文本解读
发布时间:2018-04-24 15:24
本文选题:后殖民理论 + 文化霸权 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:后殖民理论作为20世纪风行一时的理论一产生很快就风靡全球,后殖民文学作为当今文学界不容小觑的一个创作潮流,与后殖民理论有着某种不可分割的关联。本文借用后殖民理论来对后殖民文学文本进行解读,一方面发掘早期西方经典文本中的殖民意识,达到“解构”经典文本的目的;另一方面关注后殖民文学的兴起与发展概况,起到“建构”文本的目的。回顾历史,帝国主义对殖民地的侵略已是一个不争的事实和不容篡改的历史,我们应该认识到伴随着军事、经济、政治的殖民侵略的同时,西方殖民者还对殖民地的文化进行了侵略和改写,即推行文化“殖民主义”,而且文化殖民的手段多样,包括:宗教殖民、语言殖民、文学殖民等。相对于政治和经济殖民,文化殖民对殖民地带来的影响更加巨大和深远。哪怕是殖民体系解体之后,帝国主义的文化霸权意识依然存在,而且在新时期有了新的推广和演变形式,面对文化全球化,民族文化是坚持本土化还是积极应对文化全球化,是一个值得思考的命题。西方文化霸权意识多反映在文本上并借助文本进行推广,因此我们要运用后殖民理论对这些文本进行解读,以达到消解西方中心主义话语,促进东西方平等对话的目的。本文把后殖民理论作为依托,选取能阐释后殖民文学的代表作家作品进行文本解读,试图以文本尤其是小说这种世界性的文学形式作为切入点来揭示西方文化霸权,用现实的文本直接对应于西方文化霸权实践,同时,在对文本的解读过程中,更加形象直观地阐释后殖民理论。
[Abstract]:As a popular theory in the 20th century, postcolonial theory soon became popular all over the world. Post-colonial literature, as a creative trend that can not be underestimated in literary circles, has some inseparable relationship with postcolonial theory. This paper uses postcolonial theory to interpret the texts of postcolonial literature. On the one hand, it explores the colonial consciousness in the early classical texts of the West to achieve the purpose of "deconstructing" the classical texts; on the other hand, it pays close attention to the rise and development of post-colonial literature. It serves the purpose of "constructing" the text. Looking back on history, the imperialist aggression against the colonies has become an indisputable fact and a history that cannot be tampered with. We should realize that the colonial aggression accompanied by military, economic and political aggression should be accompanied by, Western colonists also invaded and rewritten the culture of the colonies, that is, to carry out cultural "colonialism", and the means of cultural colonization were various, including religious colonization, language colonization, literary colonization and so on. Compared with the political and economic colonization, the cultural colonization brings more profound and profound influence to the colonies. Even after the disintegration of the colonial system, the cultural hegemony consciousness of imperialism still exists, and in the new era, there are new forms of promotion and evolution. In the face of cultural globalization, whether national culture insists on localization or actively responds to cultural globalization, It is a proposition worth thinking about. The sense of Western cultural hegemony is mostly reflected in the text and popularized with the help of the text. Therefore, we should use the post-colonial theory to interpret these texts in order to dispel the discourse of western centrism and promote the equal dialogue between the East and the West. Based on the postcolonial theory, this paper chooses the representative writers and works which can explain the post-colonial literature to interpret the text, and tries to reveal the western cultural hegemony with the text, especially the novel, as the world literary form as the starting point. The text directly corresponds to the practice of western cultural hegemony. Meanwhile, in the process of interpreting the text, the post-colonial theory is explained more vividly and intuitively.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:I109
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张宽;;欧美人眼中的“非我族类”[J];读书;1993年09期
2 张中载;《印度之行》不和谐的双声:反殖民主义与殖民主义话语[J];外国文学;2000年03期
3 谷红丽;《简·爱》和《苍海茫茫》中的殖民主义话语[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2003年01期
4 郭英剑;带镣铐的文化帝国主义[J];民族艺术;2000年01期
5 姚新勇;危险“文化帝国主义”[J];民族艺术;2000年01期
6 刘俐俐;传统在全球化中的意义[J];人民论坛;2001年03期
7 骆文琳;解读《印度之行》中的殖民主义意识[J];四川外语学院学报;2003年03期
8 阿里夫·德里克,施山;后殖民的辉光:全球资本主义时代的第三世界批评[J];国外文学;1997年01期
9 王岳川;东西方文化视界中的“后殖民主义”[J];中国音乐;1995年01期
10 王宁;;逆写的文学: 后殖民文学的历史意义和当代价值[J];外国文学研究;2011年05期
,本文编号:1797198
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/1797198.html