论《白色城堡》中的叙事艺术

发布时间：2018-04-29 22:08

本文选题：奥尔罕·帕慕克 + 《白色城堡》　；参考：《华中师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文从国内帕慕克研究中存在的问题出发,发现对《白色城堡》的研究比较滞后,形成了所具价值性和研究现状不成比例的状况,以及在帕慕克整体研究的大背景下《白色城堡》现阶段研究也存在“大文化批评”和“人文性泛滥”的现象。本文讨论重点是《白色城堡》的叙事艺术。在帕慕克《白色城堡》研究中,本文首次提出“前言话语空间的传奇性”、“三大中心情节的构成艺术”、“叙述之我”的眼光,并以此形成了帕慕克小说创作的理论观点。注重从语言艺术上来对《白色城堡》的艺术审美进行分析,是本文的关注重点和创新点。全文由引言、正文三章、结语三大部分组成。在引言部分,主要集中讨论问题的发现、国内外研究现状、研究中存在的具体问题、论文的选题意义,并就相关的概念进行界定,相关的名词进行解释,还就《白色城堡》内部情节进行了图例说明。第一章由三个小节组成,主要就《白色城堡》中存在的“前言”进行定性分析。重点分析“前言”作为“传奇性的话语空间”得以建立的过程。最后,由此总结“前言”在《白色城堡》中存在的意义价值,即消解下的传奇性话语空间的建立具有的反差性为小说设置了悬念,并奠定了小说的基调。第二章由三个小节组成,主要讨论了小说中“写作”、“瘟疫”和“武器”三大中心情节的构成艺术。第一节主要讨论“写作”情节作为一个未完成的情节序列,“瘟疫”情节作为一个突转情节以及其内部的核心事件,这两个情节之间的关系。第二节主要讨论“武器”情节作为一个完整的情节序列其内部存在的不协调性。第三节从三大中心情节之间的关系以及由此产生的艺术效果来总结其价值意义。第三章由三小节组成,主要讨论小说采用的第一人称回顾性叙述视角中“叙述之我”眼光的两种表现方式。第一节主要讨论了小说中“叙述之我”眼光和叙述时间的问题,提出了“时间+评论”这样一种“叙述之我”眼光的表现方式。第二节主要讨论了小说中“叙述之我”眼光和元叙事之间一种互补的关系,正是在这种互补的关系之下,使得元叙事成为“叙述之我”眼光的另一种表现方式。在第三节中联系到之前传奇性话语空间、三大中心情节的构成来讨论两种表现方式的意义,并注意到这样两种表现方式在日后帕慕克创作中的地位。结语部分主要从三个方面展开：其一,帕慕克研究中需明确的几个问题,来纠偏帕慕克研究中东西文化套用,人文性视角泛滥等现象的存在。其二,全面总结本文所讨论《白色城堡》的叙事艺术。其三,从《白色城堡》的叙事艺术一窥帕慕克小说的艺术风格。
[Abstract]:Starting from the problems existing in the study of Pam 眉 k in China, this paper finds that the research on White Castle is lagging behind, and has formed a situation of value and the present situation of research is out of proportion. Under the background of the whole study of Pamuk, "White Castle" also exists the phenomenon of "big culture criticism" and "overflowing humanism". This paper focuses on the narrative art of White Castle. In the study of "White Castle", this paper for the first time puts forward the vision of "the legendary nature of preface discourse space", "the composing art of the three central plots" and "the narration of oneself", thus forming the theoretical viewpoint of Pamuk's novel creation. It is the focus and innovation of this paper to focus on the aesthetic analysis of White Castle from the point of view of language art. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, three chapters and conclusion. In the introduction part, it mainly focuses on the discovery of the problem, the current research situation at home and abroad, the specific problems existing in the research, the significance of the selected topic of the paper, and the definition of the relevant concepts, the explanation of the relevant nouns, The inner plot of the White Castle is illustrated by legend. The first chapter is composed of three sections. This paper focuses on the establishment of the preface as a legendary discourse space. Finally, the significance of the foreword in White Castle is summarized, that is, the contrast of the establishment of the legendary discourse space under the resolution sets suspense for the novel and sets the tone of the novel. The second chapter consists of three sections, which mainly discuss the composing art of writing, plague and weapon in the novel. The first section mainly discusses the relationship between "writing" plot as an unfinished plot sequence, "plague" plot as a turn-over plot and its internal core events. The second section mainly discusses the disharmony of the "weapon" plot as a complete plot sequence. The third section summarizes its value from the relationship between the three central plots and its artistic effects. The third chapter is composed of three sections, which mainly discusses the two ways of expression of "the narration of me" in the perspective of the first person retrospective narration used in the novel. The first section mainly discusses the question of "narrating me" and narrating time in the novel, and puts forward the expression way of "narrating me" as a kind of "time review". The second section mainly discusses a complementary relationship between narrative self and meta-narration, which makes meta narrative become another expression of narrative self. In the third section, the significance of the two ways of expression is discussed by referring to the former legendary discourse space and the composition of the three central plots, and the importance of these two expressions in the later creation of Pamuk is noted. The conclusion is mainly carried out from three aspects: first, some clear problems are needed in the study of Pam 眉 k to correct the existence of the phenomenon of East and West cultural application and the overflow of humanistic perspective in the study of Pam 眉 k. Secondly, it summarizes the narrative art of White Castle. Thirdly, from the narration art of White Castle, we can see the artistic style of Pamuk's novels.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I374.074

【参考文献】