论《曼斯菲尔德庄园》的电影改编
发布时间：2018-09-07 18:38
【摘要】：电影年自1895年在法国诞生以来,就与文学作品有着密不可分的关系。简·奥斯汀便是电影改编界盛久不衰的宠儿之一。作为19世纪英国文学史上家喻户晓的女性作家之一,简·奥斯汀的作品以独特的女性视角、细腻的文字以及浪漫的情调而深受众多读者的喜爱。她的小说《曼斯菲尔德庄园》出版于1814年,并于1983年改编成电视短剧,于1999年和2007年改编成电影。然而小说本身的争议性注定其电影改编之路也十分坎坷。 本文从电影改编的角度出发,比较分析了《曼斯菲尔德庄园》的小说文本,1999年改编的电影版本以及2007年改编的电影版本,旨在从这两部电影的背景改编、情节改编和人物改编三个角度探讨这两个电影改编之间,电影改编与小说文本之间的比较,对这两部电影改编的目的、改编原因以及改编的社会文化意义进行分析。 全文包括引言、正文和结语三个部分。引言主要介绍了作家作品,电影改编理论,国内外研究现状,本文所采用的研究方法,本文研究的目的,以及本文的框架。 正文分为三章。第一章比较研究这两部电影改编作品在背景改编,即社会背景与自然环境,这两个方面改编的差异。罗兹码1999年电影聚焦于废除奴隶制的19世纪社会背景并与当时的女权运动相结合,因此整个电影是沉重的社会问题与较为阴暗的自然环境的结合。相比较而言,麦克唐纳2007年的改编则充满轻松浪漫的爱情喜剧精神,整个电影基调欢乐明快,呈现出与1999年电影版截然相反的氛围。背景的改编为整个剧情的发展奠定了基础。 第二章根据情节改编的三种方式,即情节删减、情节增加和情节改变,主要探索了两个电影改编版本在情节上的改编。三种方式都为各自的故事发展需要服务,并在这些情节变动中展示出电影的社会背景与自然环境设置。在情节安排上,罗兹码为强调奴隶制主题删除了一个重要角色,增加了其他情节等,而麦克唐纳则为谱写浪漫的爱情故事改变了一些次要情节。这些情节改编反应了电影的主题,显示出改编者的改编目的,暗示了整个电影的色调。 第三章主要从人物改编这一角度分析了两部改编作品中人物的外貌和人物的语言。例如,罗兹码电影中的范尼·朴茨积极为女性身份奋争,而麦克唐纳电影中的范尼则是为爱情默默等待隐忍；因此,两位导演为显示出范尼·朴茨的个性特征安排了特定的人物视觉形象和语言。为了更好的在荧幕上展现他们的角色,两位改编者都设计了适合他们电影主题的人物外貌与主题。电影从直观上让观众看到人物的外貌,听到人物的语言。人物的视觉形象和语言的改编更加活跃了人物的外貌形象,深化了他们的性格特征,让荧幕角色变得更为生动,更让人印象深刻,推动了整个情节的发展,并且恰到好处地表达了改编者要向观众传达的信息。 结论部分对全文进行了综述,并对简·奥斯汀在电影界的受欢迎原因以及小说《曼斯菲尔德庄园》电影改编的原因进行了深刻探讨。罗兹码和麦克唐纳对《曼斯菲尔德庄园》这部小说做出了在背景、情节和人物三方面改编的不同选择。然而,这样的改编背后有其各自的原因,包括社会历史条件,改编者对小说的不同阐释,改编者想要达到的经济目的,以及考虑道观众是否能接受他们所做出的改编等等因素,这谢原因亦是其他文学作品在进行文学改编时需要考虑的。同时,论文指出,《曼斯菲尔德庄园》的电影改编丰富了简·奥斯汀小说及电影的研究,影响学者们更深层次的理解和研究文学作品。此外,这部小说的电影改编也为其他的改编提供了借鉴,即,无论哪部改编作品都应该考虑到观众的接受能力,不管是熟知文本的观众还是不熟知文本的观众。最后,本文指出了电影改编的社会与历史、理论与现实的意义。
[Abstract]:Since its birth in France in 1895, the Year of the Movie has been closely related to literary works. Jane Austen is one of the most enduring darlings in film adaptation. As one of the most well-known female writers in the history of British literature in the 19th century, Jane Austen's works have a unique feminine perspective, exquisite writing and romantic feelings. Her novel Mansfield Manor was published in 1814, adapted into a TV short in 1983, and adapted into a movie in 1999 and 2007. However, the controversial nature of the novel itself is doomed to be a bumpy road to film adaptation.
From the point of view of film adaptation, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the novel version of Mansfield Manor, the film version adapted in 1999 and the film version adapted in 2007. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between film adaptation and novel text from the three perspectives of background adaptation, plot adaptation and character adaptation. Comparing the two films, the paper analyzes the purpose, the reasons and the social and cultural significance of the adaptation.
The introduction mainly introduces the author's works, the theory of film adaptation, the research status at home and abroad, the research methods adopted in this paper, the purpose of this study, and the framework of this paper.
The first chapter is a comparative study of the differences between the two film adaptation works in the background adaptation, namely, social background and natural environment. The 1999 film of Rhodes Code focuses on the social background of the abolition of slavery in the 19th century and combines with the feminist movement at that time, so the whole film is a heavy social problem and comparison. In contrast, McDonald's 2007 adaptation is full of light-hearted romantic romantic comedy, and the film's tone is lively, disparate from the 1999 edition. The adaptation of the background lays the foundation for the development of the whole plot.
Chapter Two explores the adaptation of the two film adaptation versions according to the three ways of plot adaptation, i.e. plot deletion, plot addition and plot change. Each of the three ways serves the needs of the story development and reveals the social background and natural environment settings of the film in these changes. Rhodes code deletes an important role and adds other plots to emphasize the subject of slavery, while MacDonald changes minor plots for romantic love stories. These plot adaptations reflect the theme of the film, reveal the purpose of the adapter, and suggest the tone of the film.
The third chapter mainly analyzes the appearance and language of the characters in the two adapted works from the perspective of character adaptation. For example, Fanny Potts in the Rhodes Code movies is actively fighting for female identity, while Fanny in the MacDonald movies is silently waiting for love to endure; therefore, the two directors are trying to show Fanny Potts'individuality. In order to better display their roles on the screen, the two adapters have designed the appearance and theme of the characters suitable for their film themes. The film lets the audience see the appearance of the characters and hear the language of the characters intuitively. The appearance of the characters deepens their personality characteristics, makes the screen characters more vivid and impressive, promotes the development of the whole plot, and properly expresses the message the adapter wants to convey to the audience.
The conclusion summarizes the full text and explores the reasons for Jane Austen's popularity in the film world and the reasons for her adaptation of the novel Mansfield Manor. There are various reasons behind such adaptation, including social and historical conditions, different interpretations of the novel by the adapter, the economic goals the adapter wants to achieve, and whether the Taoist audience can accept the adaptions they have made. This is also the reason why other literary works should be considered in literary adaptation. It points out that the film adaptation of Mansfield Manor enriches Jane Austen's novel and film studies, and influences scholars'deeper understanding and study of literary works. Finally, this paper points out the social and historical significance, theoretical and practical significance of film adaptation.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：J905;I561.074
本文编号：2229097
[Abstract]:Since its birth in France in 1895, the Year of the Movie has been closely related to literary works. Jane Austen is one of the most enduring darlings in film adaptation. As one of the most well-known female writers in the history of British literature in the 19th century, Jane Austen's works have a unique feminine perspective, exquisite writing and romantic feelings. Her novel Mansfield Manor was published in 1814, adapted into a TV short in 1983, and adapted into a movie in 1999 and 2007. However, the controversial nature of the novel itself is doomed to be a bumpy road to film adaptation.
From the point of view of film adaptation, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the novel version of Mansfield Manor, the film version adapted in 1999 and the film version adapted in 2007. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between film adaptation and novel text from the three perspectives of background adaptation, plot adaptation and character adaptation. Comparing the two films, the paper analyzes the purpose, the reasons and the social and cultural significance of the adaptation.
The introduction mainly introduces the author's works, the theory of film adaptation, the research status at home and abroad, the research methods adopted in this paper, the purpose of this study, and the framework of this paper.
The first chapter is a comparative study of the differences between the two film adaptation works in the background adaptation, namely, social background and natural environment. The 1999 film of Rhodes Code focuses on the social background of the abolition of slavery in the 19th century and combines with the feminist movement at that time, so the whole film is a heavy social problem and comparison. In contrast, McDonald's 2007 adaptation is full of light-hearted romantic romantic comedy, and the film's tone is lively, disparate from the 1999 edition. The adaptation of the background lays the foundation for the development of the whole plot.
Chapter Two explores the adaptation of the two film adaptation versions according to the three ways of plot adaptation, i.e. plot deletion, plot addition and plot change. Each of the three ways serves the needs of the story development and reveals the social background and natural environment settings of the film in these changes. Rhodes code deletes an important role and adds other plots to emphasize the subject of slavery, while MacDonald changes minor plots for romantic love stories. These plot adaptations reflect the theme of the film, reveal the purpose of the adapter, and suggest the tone of the film.
The third chapter mainly analyzes the appearance and language of the characters in the two adapted works from the perspective of character adaptation. For example, Fanny Potts in the Rhodes Code movies is actively fighting for female identity, while Fanny in the MacDonald movies is silently waiting for love to endure; therefore, the two directors are trying to show Fanny Potts'individuality. In order to better display their roles on the screen, the two adapters have designed the appearance and theme of the characters suitable for their film themes. The film lets the audience see the appearance of the characters and hear the language of the characters intuitively. The appearance of the characters deepens their personality characteristics, makes the screen characters more vivid and impressive, promotes the development of the whole plot, and properly expresses the message the adapter wants to convey to the audience.
The conclusion summarizes the full text and explores the reasons for Jane Austen's popularity in the film world and the reasons for her adaptation of the novel Mansfield Manor. There are various reasons behind such adaptation, including social and historical conditions, different interpretations of the novel by the adapter, the economic goals the adapter wants to achieve, and whether the Taoist audience can accept the adaptions they have made. This is also the reason why other literary works should be considered in literary adaptation. It points out that the film adaptation of Mansfield Manor enriches Jane Austen's novel and film studies, and influences scholars'deeper understanding and study of literary works. Finally, this paper points out the social and historical significance, theoretical and practical significance of film adaptation.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：J905;I561.074
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 廖为应;;从接受美学看电影《傲慢与偏见》[J];电影评介;2008年12期
，本文编号：2229097
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2229097.html
