反启蒙视野下的《俄狄浦斯王》
发布时间：2018-11-26 21:05
【摘要】：本文以古希腊悲剧《俄狄浦斯王》为载体,比较古希腊雅典古典时代的语境、18世纪语境与20世纪中叶以来反启蒙思潮三种语境下的解读,辨别不同性质的“反启蒙”话语与启蒙主义的关系及其价值。本文共分三个章节,第一章试图将《俄狄浦斯王》置于其产生的话语背景下予以解读,指出在作品中俄狄浦斯的失败是其无法逃脱的命运使然,是古希腊雅典启蒙时代,神的权威不可撼动的表征。第二章试图将《俄狄浦斯王》置于当下后现代思潮崛起的话语背景下予以解读,指出俄狄浦斯在当代失败是由于自身的缺陷(人及其理性的不健全)所导致的。第三章通过比较以上两种语境下对《俄狄浦斯王》的解读,试图回答以下三个问题:(1)启蒙出现问题时,我们应该怎么办;(2)启蒙和反启蒙的关系是怎样的;(3)当下反启蒙的价值及其应避免的问题。
[Abstract]:Based on the tragedy of ancient Greece, King Oedipus, this paper compares the context of the ancient Greek Athens classical era, the context of the 18th century and the anti-enlightenment trend of thought since the middle of the 20th century. Distinguish the relationship and value of anti-enlightenment discourse and enlightenment doctrine. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter tries to interpret Oedipus under the background of his discourse, and points out that the failure of Oedipus in his works is his inescapable fate, and it is the Enlightenment of Athens in ancient Greece. The unshakable expression of God's authority. The second chapter tries to interpret King Oedipus in the context of the rise of postmodernism, and points out that Oedipus' failure in the contemporary era is caused by his own defects (human beings and their rational imperfections). The third chapter tries to answer the following three questions by comparing the interpretation of King Oedipus in the above two contexts: (1) what should we do when there are problems in enlightenment, (2) what is the relationship between enlightenment and anti-enlightenment; (3) the value of anti-enlightenment and the problems that should be avoided.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I106
本文编号：2359616
[Abstract]:Based on the tragedy of ancient Greece, King Oedipus, this paper compares the context of the ancient Greek Athens classical era, the context of the 18th century and the anti-enlightenment trend of thought since the middle of the 20th century. Distinguish the relationship and value of anti-enlightenment discourse and enlightenment doctrine. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter tries to interpret Oedipus under the background of his discourse, and points out that the failure of Oedipus in his works is his inescapable fate, and it is the Enlightenment of Athens in ancient Greece. The unshakable expression of God's authority. The second chapter tries to interpret King Oedipus in the context of the rise of postmodernism, and points out that Oedipus' failure in the contemporary era is caused by his own defects (human beings and their rational imperfections). The third chapter tries to answer the following three questions by comparing the interpretation of King Oedipus in the above two contexts: (1) what should we do when there are problems in enlightenment, (2) what is the relationship between enlightenment and anti-enlightenment; (3) the value of anti-enlightenment and the problems that should be avoided.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I106
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 陶渝苏;差异与同一的对抗——评西方后现代主义对本质主义哲学的拒斥[J];贵州社会科学;2002年03期
2 邓宏艺;;理性的悲歌——重读《俄狄浦斯王》[J];贵州社会科学;2007年03期
3 陈晓明;现代性之隐忧与多样性方案[J];海南师范学院学报(社会科学版);2004年06期
4 张岩;刘欣;;古希腊命运观念的现代阐释[J];齐鲁学刊;2007年04期
，本文编号：2359616
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2359616.html
