当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 儿科论文 >

不同胎龄别体重新生儿ABO血型不合溶血病对器官功能的影响研究

发布时间:2018-03-02 00:30

  本文关键词: 新生儿 ABO溶血 胎龄 影响 出处:《昆明医科大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:目的:回顾性分析196例不同胎龄别体重新生儿ABO溶血病(ABO-HDN)病例。对入院期间血生化、凝血功能及血糖的变化进行分析,并就新生儿ABO溶血病对器官功能的影响进行评价。方法:选取2013年2月至2016年4月期间昆明医科大学第二附属医院儿科新生儿病区收治的确诊新生儿ABO溶血病196例,分为小于胎龄组(SGA组,n=29),适于胎龄组(AGA组,n=132),大于胎龄组(LGA组,n=35);并随机选取同期住院无黄疸的处于疾病恢复期足月新生儿为对照组(n=75),所有观察组的新生儿均在入院后立即检测血生化、凝血功能及血糖,并对这些指标的变化进行统计学分析。结果:1.肝功能(1)SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组ALT值分别为(19.54±3.88 U/L)、(20.29±3.70 U/L)、(16.54±3.50 U/L)、(13.45±1.48 U/L),SGA组和AGA组ALT测定值均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),其余两两组比较无差异(P0.05)。(2)SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组AST测定值分别为(63.24±10.68 U/L)、(59.02±3.53 U/L)、(53.79±±8.12 U/L)、(41.36±3.88 U/L),三个研究组AST值较对照组升高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),其余两两组比较无统计学意义(P0.05)。2.肾功能SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组血清BUN和CREA测定值分别为(3.20±0.85mmol/l;56.20±7.76 u mol/l)、(3.43±0.33 mmol/l;55.89±6.07umol/l)、(3.04±0.65 mmol/1;50.75±7.69μmol/1)、(2.94±0.32 mmol/l;51.58±5.33μmol/1),进行两两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。3.心肌酶SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组CK-MB测定值分别为(53.48±11.59 U/L)、(42.83±3.96 U/L)、(39.08±6.67 U/L)、(28.69±4.38 U/L),三个观察组CK-MB值均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),其余两两组比较无统计学意义(P0.05)。4.凝血功能(1)SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组PT值分别为(18.86±2.85s)、(16.45±1.73s)、(17.14±2.65s)、(15.60±1.49s),SGA组和LGA组PT测定值均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),其余两两组比较无差异(P0.05)。(2)SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组APTT测定值分别为(54.70±7.62s)、(42.35±3.18s)、(42.13±4.73s)、(38.56±2.02s),三个观察组APTT值均较对照组升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);SGA组APTT值高于AGA组、LGA组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);其余两两组比较无差异(P0.05)。(3)SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组FIB值分别为(2.80±0.35 g/1)、(2.85±0.21 g/1)、(3.01±0.39 g/1)、(2.87±0.20 g/1),进行两两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。(4)SGA组、AGA组、LGA组和对照组TT测定值分别为(18.07±3.80s)、(16.73±2.69s)、(16.47±1.26s)、(15.89±2.57s),SGA组TT测定值较对照组增高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),其余两两组比较无差异(P0.05)。5.血糖SGA组、AGA组、LGA组发生低血糖率分别为3.44%、3.78%、0.00%,所有研究组低血糖发生率3.06%。这三个观察组发生低血糖情况比较无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:1.新生儿ABO溶血病可能引起肝功、肾功、心肌酶、凝血功能和糖代谢的异常。2.不同胎龄别体重新生儿ABO溶血病对器官功能的影响之间无明显相关性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to retrospectively analyze 196 cases of ABO hemolytic disease of newborns of different gestational age, and analyze the changes of blood biochemistry, coagulation function and blood glucose during admission. The effects of neonatal ABO hemolytic disease on organ function were evaluated. Methods: from February 2013 to April 2016, 196 cases of neonatal ABO hemolytic disease were selected and treated in pediatric neonatal ward of the second affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. It was divided into small gestational age group and SGA group, suitable for gestational age group and AGA group, and larger than LGA group for gestational age group, and randomly selected term neonates without jaundice in the same period as control group. All the newborns in observation group were all admitted to hospital. Immediately test blood biochemistry, The changes of blood coagulation function and blood glucose were analyzed statistically. Results: the ALT values of AGA group and control group were 19.54 卤3.88 U / L, 20.29 卤3.70 U / L, 16.54 卤3.50 UL / L, 13.45 卤1.48 UL / L SGA and 1.48 UL / L AGA, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in control group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The AST of the other two groups were 63.24 卤10.68 U / L and 59.02 卤3.53 U / L / L respectively. The AST values of the three study groups were 41.36 卤3.88 U / L / L ~ (-1) and 41.36 卤3.88 U / L / L ~ (-1), respectively. The serum BUN and CREA in the renal function SGA group and the control group were 3.20 卤0.85 mmol / L 56.20 卤7.76 mmol / L respectively (3.43 卤0.33 mmol / L = 55.89 卤6.07 mmol / L) 3.04 卤0.65 mmol / 1 卤7.69 渭 mol / L / L respectively. There was no significant difference in CK-MB between SGA group and control group (P < 0.05). The CK-MB values were 53.48 卤11.59 U / L, 42.83 卤3.96 U / L, 39.08 卤6.67 U / L and 28.69 卤4.38 U / L, respectively. The CK-MB values of the three observation groups were higher than those of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the other two groups. The PT values of LGA group and control group were higher than those of control group. The PT values in SGA group and LGA group were higher than those in control group. The PT values in SGA group and LGA group were higher than those in control group. The PT values in SGA group and LGA group were higher than those in control group. The PT values in SGA group and LGA group were significantly higher than those in control group (P < 0.05), and the PT values in SGA group and LGA group were significantly higher than those in control group. There was no significant difference between the other two groups (P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05), and the APTT values of the control group and the control group were 42.35 卤3.18 s and 42.13 卤4.73 sl, respectively. The APTT values of the three observation groups were higher than those of the control group, and the APTT values of the three observation groups were significantly higher than those of the AGA group. There was no significant difference between the other two groups in the FIB values of the AGA group and the control group were 2.80 卤0.35 g / L and 2.85 卤0.21 g / 1 / 1 respectively, and the FIB values of the two groups were 3.01 卤0.39 g / 1 2.87 卤0.20 g / 1, respectively. There was no significant difference in TT between LGA group and control group in AGA group and control group. The TT of SGA group was higher than that of control group. The TT of SGA group was higher than that of control group (P < 0.05). The TT of SGA group was higher than that of control group (P < 0.05), the TT of LGA group and control group were 16.73 卤2.69 sl, respectively, and the TT of SGA group was higher than that of control group. The hypoglycemia rate in SGA group was 3.44 and 3.780.000.The incidence of hypoglycemia in all study groups was 3.060.There was no significant difference between the other two groups. There was no significant difference in hypoglycemia among the three observation groups. Conclusion: 1. Neonatal ABO hemolytic disease may cause liver function, Abnormal renal function, myocardial enzymes, coagulation function and glucose metabolism. There was no significant correlation between ABO hemolytic disease and organ function in neonates with different gestational weight.
【学位授予单位】:昆明医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R722.18

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 朱康儿,徐扬,吴东,钟隽;主要ABO血型不合异基因造血干细胞移植后纯红细胞再生障碍(英文)[J];中国实验血液学杂志;2002年01期

2 孙万军,乔建辉,余长林,王丹红,郭梅,孙琪云,张石,艾辉胜;ABO血型不合非清髓异基因外周血干细胞移植12例[J];中华器官移植杂志;2004年03期

3 郑立君;;ABO血型不合致慢性溶血性输血反应一例分析[J];齐鲁医学检验;2005年06期

4 范辉;靖_g;李红华;卢学春;于力;;ABO血型不合异基因造血干细胞移植后并发纯红系再生障碍[J];中国实验血液学杂志;2008年02期

5 陈晓燕;蒋秀美;张飞彦;;ABO血型不合异基因外周血造血干细胞移植的护理[J];江苏医药;2010年17期

6 王存明,任承玉;ABO血型不合致急性粒细胞缺乏症1例分析[J];山西临床医药;1998年03期

7 ;ABO血型不合者能结婚吗[J];医药与保健;1999年09期

8 蔡紫珍 ,刘晓岚 ,李烽;ABO血型不合异基因外周血造血干细胞移植后血型的转变(附2例报告)[J];福建医药杂志;2002年02期

9 丁素娟;中西医结合防治ABO血型不合所致新生儿高胆红素血症[J];河南诊断与治疗杂志;2002年05期

10 黄晓军,刘代红,许兰平,韩伟,江倩,陈育红,张耀臣,刘开彦,鲍立,陆道培;ABO血型不合的异基因造血干细胞移植后红系恢复多因素分析[J];中国实验血液学杂志;2004年06期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 邓婷芬;毛平;李庆山;;ABO血型不合异基因造血干细胞移植[A];中华医学会第八次全国血液学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年

2 范辉;于力;朱宏丽;卢学春;靖域;;ABO血型不合的异基因造血干细胞移植临床研究[A];第11次中国实验血液学会议论文汇编[C];2007年

3 范辉;于力;朱宏丽;卢学春;靖域;;ABO血型不合的异基因造血干细胞移植[A];中华医学会第11届全国内科学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

4 蔡雪娇;洪俊英;陈怡;俞康;;ABO血型不合对异基因造血干细胞移植红系造血恢复的影响[A];2012年浙江省血液病学年会论文集[C];2012年

5 陈颖异;;扶正祛邪莲黄汤治疗母儿ABO血型不合抗体效价的影响[A];医学科研成果与应用[C];2011年

6 蔡雪娇;谢作听;孙岚;俞康;;ABO血型不合对清髓异基因造血干细胞移植造血重建的影响[A];2012年浙江省血液病学年会论文集[C];2012年

7 江春平;丁义涛;;ABO血型不合供肝在肝移植中的应用[A];2013中国器官移植大会论文汇编[C];2013年

8 张元珍;彭倩;;母儿ABO血型不合与不良妊娠结局[A];’96全国优生科学大会大会学术讲演与大会论文摘要汇编[C];1996年

9 范晓艳;钱海墨;陈颖异;;陈颖异治疗母儿ABO血型不合经验撷菁[A];创新创业与科学发展——瑞安市第十届自然科学优秀论文集[C];2011年

10 李归宁;刘峰;王晓蓓;胡丽华;;微柱凝胶卡在ABO血型不合造血干细胞移植患者血型鉴定中的应用[A];中华医学会第九次全国检验医学学术会议暨中国医院协会临床检验管理专业委员会第六届全国临床检验实验室管理学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 钟山;诱导灵长类动物ABO血型不合肾移植“适应”的实验研究[D];华中科技大学;2012年

2 张弛;灵长类动物ABO血型不合肾移植超急性排斥反应研究模型的建立[D];华中科技大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 恩博高(OEURN BROKOB);不同胎龄别体重新生儿ABO血型不合溶血病对器官功能的影响研究[D];昆明医科大学;2016年

2 李俊萍;主要ABO血型不合异基因造血干细胞移植后纯红再障[D];暨南大学;2006年

3 邱黎明;ABO血型不合致复发性流产中医证候分布规律研究[D];山东中医药大学;2015年

4 张茶英;茵栀安胎饮防治母儿ABO血型不合的临床观察[D];福建中医药大学;2012年

5 吕延冬;茵陈二丹二黄汤治疗母儿ABO血型不合(湿热瘀结型)随机、平行对照临床疗效观察研究[D];成都中医药大学;2012年



本文编号:1554280

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/eklw/1554280.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a78ae***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com