小儿细菌性肺炎的高效识别模型及临床价值研究
本文选题:肺炎 切入点:细菌性 出处:《中国全科医学》2017年03期
【摘要】:背景目前国内尚缺乏对发热就诊的肺炎患儿是否为细菌感染做出快速判断的简易方法,容易引起漏诊及抗生素的滥用。目的建立预判发热就诊的肺炎患儿是否为细菌感染的简单模型。方法回顾性选取2012—2013年温州医科大学附属第二医院育英儿童医院符合纳入标准的以发热就诊的肺炎患儿538例为研究对象。根据疾病原因将患儿分为细菌感染组(133例)和非细菌感染组(405例)。从538例患儿中随机选取54例作为验证集(细菌性肺炎13例,非细菌性肺炎41例)。收集患儿一般资料、实验室检测结果,建立5个诊断细菌性肺炎的模型〔F1=C反应蛋白(CRP)×降钙素原(PCT)、F2=CRP2×PCT、F3=CRP×PCT2、F4=性别权重×就诊季节权重×喘息症状系数×(CRP×PCT)、F5=性别权重×就诊季节权重×喘息症状系数×(CRP×PCT2)〕,绘制其诊断细菌性肺炎的ROC曲线,确定最优模型。结果两组患儿性别、就诊季节、寒战发生率、呼吸加快发生率、喘息发生率、呕吐发生率、腹泻发生率、哭闹发生率、干Up音发生率、湿Up音发生率、发热持续天数、最高体温、白细胞计数(WBC)、CRP水平、PCT水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。单独CRP诊断细菌性肺炎的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.969,95%CI(0.955,0.979),临界值为48.5 mg/L,灵敏度为88.0%,特异度为93.6%;单独PCT诊断细菌性肺炎的AUC为0.974,95%CI(0.959,0.989),临界值为0.5 g/L,灵敏度为92.5%,特异度为84.0%;F1诊断细菌性肺炎的AUC为0.983,95%CI(0.973,0.993),临界值为17.4,灵敏度为92.5%,特异度为96.3%;F2诊断细菌性肺炎的AUC为0.981,95%CI(0.971,0.992),临界值为241.1,灵敏度为97.7%,特异度为90.6%;F3诊断细菌性肺炎的AUC为0.983,95%CI(0.973,0.993),临界值为6.3,灵敏度为94.0%,特异度为96.3%;F4诊断细菌性肺炎的AUC为0.987,95%CI(0.980,0.996),临界值为1.1,灵敏度为94.7%,特异度为95.6%;F5诊断细菌性肺炎的AUC为0.988,95%CI(0.981,0.997),临界值为0.2,灵敏度为97.7%,特异度为94.3%。根据单独CRP、单独PCT、F5的临界值,对验证集患儿进行诊断,结果显示,单独CRP诊断验证集患儿细菌性肺炎的灵敏度为76.9%,特异度为97.6%,正确率为92.6%;单独PCT诊断验证集患儿细菌性肺炎的灵敏度为84.6%,特异度为97.6%,正确率为94.4%;F5诊断验证集患儿细菌性肺炎的灵敏度为92.3%,特异度为97.6%,正确率为96.3%。结论对于因发热就诊的肺炎患儿,可以通过F5模型〔F5=性别权重×就诊季节权重×喘息症状系数×(CRP×PCT2)〕计算得到相应的结果,若结果大于0.2,可诊断细菌性肺炎,建议早期使用抗生素治疗。
[Abstract]:Background at present, there is a lack of a simple method for the rapid diagnosis of bacterial infection in children with pneumonia. Objective to establish a simple model for predicting bacterial infection in children with febrile pneumonia. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to select Yuying Children's Hospital of the second affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University in 2012-2013. A total of 538 children with pneumonia with fever were included in the study. According to the causes of the disease, the children were divided into bacterial infection group (133 cases) and non-bacterial infection group (405 cases). From 538 children, 54 cases were randomly selected as the validation set. (13 cases of bacterial pneumonia). General data and laboratory results of 41 cases of non-bacterial pneumonia were collected. To establish five models for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia: CRP) 脳 procalcitonin, CRP2 脳 PCT _ 2, CRP 脳 PCT _ 2F _ 4 = sex weight 脳 seasonal weight 脳 wheezing symptom coefficient 脳 sex weight 脳 seasonal weight 脳 wheezing symptom coefficient 脳 panting symptom coefficient 脳 CRP 脳 PCT _ 2, and its diagnostic bacteria were plotted. ROC curve of pneumonia, Results Sex, consultation season, shivering rate, respiratory acceleration rate, wheezing rate, vomiting rate, diarrhea rate, crying rate, dry up sound rate, wet up sound rate were determined in the two groups. The duration of fever, the highest body temperature, the WBCU CRP level and the PCT level were compared. The area under the ROC curve of CRP alone for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was 0.969 ~ 95%, the critical value was 48.5 mg / L, the sensitivity was 88.0 and the specificity was 93.60.The AUC of single PCT for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was 0.9749% CI0.95999, the critical value was 0.5 g / L, the sensitivity was 92.5 mg / L, the sensitivity was 92.5 mg / L, the critical value was 0.5 g / L, and the sensitivity was 92.5 mg / L, respectively. The AUC for diagnosing bacterial pneumonia in F _ 1 was 0.983C _ (95), the critical value was 17.4, the sensitivity was 92.5, the AUC for F _ 2 was 0.981C _ (95) CI 0.9922.The critical value was 241.1, the sensitivity was 97.7m, the AUC for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was 0.98395 C _ (3) 0.9730.993T, the critical value for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was 0.98395 C _ (2), the critical value was 0.9921, the critical value was 97.7%, and the specificity was 0.98395% (0.9730.993N). The AUC, the critical value, the sensitivity, the specificity, the critical value, the sensitivity, the AUC, the critical value, the sensitivity, the AUC, the critical value and the specificity for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia were 0.98895CI0.9810.997, 0.98895CI0.991, 0.98895CI0.991, 0.98895CI0.991, 0.98895CI0.991, 0.98895CI0.9810.997and 0.98895CI0.9810.997.The critical value, sensitivity and specificity were 0.98895CI0.9810.997and 0.98895CI0.9810.997. Critical value of individual PCTN F5, The diagnosis of children with validation set showed that, The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of single CRP diagnostic verification set were 76.9, 97.6and 92.6percent respectively, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of single PCT diagnosis and verification set were 84.6, 97.6and 94.4g respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bacterial pneumonia were 92.3%, 97.6 and 96.3.Conclusion for pneumonia children with fever, the sensitivity is 92.3%, the specificity is 97.6%, and the accuracy rate is 96.3.Conclusion:. The corresponding results can be calculated by F5 model: F5 = sex weight 脳 seasonal weight 脳 wheezing symptom coefficient 脳 CRP 脳 PCT2P). If the result is greater than 0.2, bacterial pneumonia can be diagnosed and antibiotics should be used early.
【作者单位】: 温州医科大学附属第二医院育英儿童医院内分泌遗传代谢科;
【基金】:浙江省温州市科技局科研基金资助项目(Y20120122)
【分类号】:R725.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 尹本义;人类免疫缺陷病毒感染与细菌性肺炎[J];中国临床医生;2001年02期
2 田莉 ,孙力军,史彦筠;卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎误诊细菌性肺炎1例[J];辽宁医学杂志;2002年06期
3 江明荣;黄循斌;谢晓彬;;可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1对细菌性肺炎的评价及临床意义[J];南昌大学学报(医学版);2013年04期
4 史广超;邢亚恒;李景钊;;左氧氟沙星注射液联合咳露口服液治疗细菌性肺炎的临床观察[J];中国医学创新;2013年26期
5 江开勇,顾鸿雁;两叶性细菌性肺炎1例[J];实用医学杂志;1998年09期
6 陈健;安络欣治疗细菌性肺炎120例[J];药学实践杂志;2000年02期
7 段鹏程,方娟娟;治疗112例细菌性肺炎的用药调查[J];中国药师;2000年01期
8 陈运琴;细菌性肺炎69例的X钱表现及其吸收情况分析[J];实用医技;2000年10期
9 张晓战 ,刘志燕,张东藩,张琦;肺结核及细菌性肺炎患者血浆内皮素_(-1)水平改变及其意义[J];陕西医学杂志;2002年03期
10 李广如,李响;细菌性肺炎116例临床治疗观察[J];临床军医杂志;2005年03期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 李建生;张艳霞;周红艳;余海滨;乔翠霞;;细菌性肺炎痰热证模型的建立与评价[A];第九届中国中西医结合实验医学学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2009年
2 黄美杏;陈斯宁;韦思尊;谭玉萍;梁爱武;杨益宝;潘玲;古立新;;痰热清注射液合抗生素治疗细菌性肺炎的疗效观察[A];第七次全国中西医结合呼吸病学术交流大会论文汇编(一)[C];2004年
3 刘阳;;血清降钙素原测定在细菌性肺炎和肺结核鉴别诊断中的意义[A];结核病和呼吸疾病诊治进展及治疗中肝损害专题研讨会资料汇编[C];2013年
4 朱康元;童武华;过勇杰;;降钙素原、C反应蛋白在细菌性肺炎诊断价值研究[A];重症医学十年回顾与展望——2012年浙江省重症医学学术年会论文汇编[C];2012年
5 李国勤;;临床辨治细菌性肺炎的体会[A];第十次全国中西医结合防治呼吸系统疾病学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
6 王晓莉;;新生儿细菌性肺炎高危因素分析及防治探讨:附82例临床分析[A];2006(第三届)江浙沪儿科学术会议暨浙江省儿科学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 徐济民;冬春之交谨防细菌性肺炎[N];新华日报;2007年
2 ;细菌性肺炎不是传染病[N];大众卫生报;2004年
3 复旦大学附属中山医院呼吸科 副教授 李华茵;肺炎[N];家庭医生报;2009年
4 彭再梅;细说细菌性肺炎[N];大众卫生报;2003年
5 ;治细菌性肺炎验方[N];农村医药报(汉);2005年
6 本报特约记者 张献怀;非典型肺炎并不可怕[N];健康时报;2003年
7 张献怀;春季谨防肺炎发生[N];大众科技报;2003年
8 本报记者 白毅;肺炎非老弱专利 强壮成年患者更易忽视[N];中国医药报;2014年
9 熊志伟;如何预防冬春传染病[N];大众卫生报;2007年
10 辽宁中医学院教授 赵秋英;流感都有哪些并发症[N];上海中医药报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 焦扬;解毒活血法治疗耐药细菌性肺炎的临床与实验研究[D];北京中医药大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 李妍;新乡地区细菌性肺炎病原菌分布、耐药特点及同源性分析[D];新乡医学院;2015年
2 廖婷婷;60例婴幼儿细菌性肺炎病例分析[D];广西医科大学;2012年
3 李鸣;血清降钙素原在细菌性肺炎中的临床价值探讨[D];福建医科大学;2012年
4 许丽萍;降钙素原检测对婴幼儿细菌性肺炎病情和预后的指导价值及意义的探讨[D];郑州大学;2014年
5 孙晓凤;肺炎合剂对细菌性肺炎患儿血清PCT、hs-CRP、WBC变化的影响的观察[D];新疆医科大学;2014年
6 苏冠琴;SARS与细菌性肺炎的CT影像对比研究[D];天津医科大学;2004年
7 阮永春;血清sTREM-1及PCT测定在BP及IPIF诊断中的意义[D];浙江大学;2010年
,本文编号:1663643
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/eklw/1663643.html