当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 儿科论文 >

腹部九法为主治疗小儿胃脘积滞型厌食症的临床观察

发布时间:2018-05-05 00:12

  本文选题:手法 + 小儿 ; 参考:《安徽中医药大学》2016年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的探讨腹部九法(推、摩、揉、按、荡、抄、挤碾、拿)为主的推拿方法与传统手法治疗小儿胃脘积滞型厌食症的疗效比较。方法选择安徽中医药大学中西医结合医院及安徽省中医院小儿推拿科2012年9月至2015年6月诊治的小儿胃脘积滞型厌食症患儿76例,依据患儿的就诊先后顺序按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组各38例。治疗组采用腹部九法为主推拿治疗,对照组采用传统推拿手法治疗。两组均10天为一个疗程,分别于1个疗程、2个疗程后,观察两组患儿治疗前后症状、体征、厌食消失时间等改善情况,并在治疗后3个月、6个月随访患儿体重情况。结果两组患儿通过不同手法治疗,治疗10天后,治疗组痊愈7例(占18.42%),显效22例(占57.90%),有效6例(占15.79%),无效3例(占7.89%),总的有效率为92.11%;对照组痊愈3例(占7.89%),显效17例(占44.74%),有效10例(占26.32%),无效8例(占21.05%),总有效率为78.95%。两组患儿治疗后疗效比较χ2=4.003,P=0.038(P0.05),结果具有统计学意义。两组患儿治疗20天后,治疗组痊愈27例(占71.05%),显效9例(占23.68%),有效2例(占5.27%);对照组痊愈13例(占34.21%),显效15例(占39.47%),有效10例(占26.32%),两组数据结果分析表明,治疗组与对照组总有效率均为100%,差异无统计学意义(P=1)。两组愈显率及痊愈率比较差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,治疗组患儿厌食消失时间(7.87±4.28d),明显短于对照组(12.66±5.52d),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后3个月随访治疗组患儿体重增长(15.3±0.90kg)明显高于对照组(15.0±0.81kg)(P0.05)。治疗后6个月随访治疗组患儿体重增长(15.9±0.81kg)明显高于对照组(15.3±0.92kg)(P0.05)。结论腹部九法与传统手法对治疗小儿胃脘积滞型厌食症均有效,但腹部九法更注重辨证分型,腹部九法在小儿胃脘积滞型治疗上疗效更为确切,其手法要求轻快柔和,平稳着实,灵活变化,取穴更为精减,较传统手法具有起效快、疗程短等优势,因此腹部九法为主的推拿治疗小儿胃脘积滞型厌食症可在临床大力推广及普及应用。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the curative effect of nine abdominal massage methods (pushing, rubbing, rubbing, pressing, swinging, copying, squeezing, taking) with traditional manipulation in treating anorexia of stomachache in children. Methods 76 children with anorexia gastricum from September 2012 to June 2015 were selected from the Department of Pediatric Massage, Anhui University of traditional Chinese Medicine and the Department of Pediatric Massage, Anhui University of traditional Chinese Medicine. According to the order of visit, the children were divided into treatment group (38 cases) and control group (38 cases). The treatment group was treated by abdominal nine-method massage, while the control group was treated by traditional massage manipulation. After two courses of treatment, the symptoms, signs and anorexia were observed before and after treatment, and the body weight was followed up for 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Results after 10 days of treatment, the two groups were treated with different manipulations. In the treatment group, 7 cases (18.42%) were cured, 22 cases (57.90%) were effective, 6 cases (15.79%) were effective, 3 cases (7.89 9%) were invalid (7.89%), the total effective rate was 92.11%, in the control group, 3 cases (7.89%) were cured (7.89%), 17 cases (44.74%) were effective, 10 cases (26.32 cases) were effective (26.32%), 8 cases (21.05%) were ineffective, the total effective rate was 78.9595. There was significant difference between the two groups in the curative effect after treatment (蠂 2 / 4.003 / P = 0.038 / P 0.05). After 20 days of treatment, 27 cases (71.055%) were cured, 9 cases (23.68%) were effective, 2 cases (5.27%) were effective in the treatment group, 13 cases (34.21%) were cured in the control group, 15 cases (39.47) were effective, 10 cases (26.32%) were effective in both groups. The total effective rate of the treatment group and the control group was 100%, the difference was not statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). After treatment, the time of anorexia in the treatment group was 7.87 卤4.28 days, which was significantly shorter than that in the control group (12.66 卤5.52 d), and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The weight gain of the children in the treatment group (15.3 卤0.90 kg) was significantly higher than that in the control group (15.0 卤0.81kg / kg). The body weight gain in the treatment group was 15.9 卤0.81kg, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (15.3 卤0.92kg / kg). Conclusion both abdominal nine method and traditional manipulation are effective in the treatment of children with anorexia of stomach accumulation stagnation, but the abdominal nine methods pay more attention to the differentiation of symptoms and signs, and the abdominal nine method is more effective in treating children with gastralgia, and its manipulation requires lightness and softness. Stable solid, flexible change, point selection more refined, faster than the traditional manipulation, short course of treatment and other advantages, so the abdominal nine methods of massage treatment of children with anorexia gastralis stagnation can be vigorously promoted and popularized in clinical application.
【学位授予单位】:安徽中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R246.4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 彭志春;小儿厌食症的中医药治疗进展[J];国医论坛;2000年04期

2 杨碧;小儿厌食症诊治体会[J];湖南中医药导报;2000年10期

3 夏继军;儿康宁治疗小儿厌食症60例[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2000年10期

4 黄对忠,黄琳,郑汉臣,王奕交,张巧艳;獐宝治疗小儿厌食症60例临床观察[J];药学实践杂志;2000年02期

5 林启声;小儿厌食症论治规律[J];中国民间疗法;2000年04期

6 王雷,许应荣;儿康宁治疗小儿厌食症临床观察[J];职业与健康;2000年09期

7 杨朝娅,王宏祥;儿康宁治疗小儿厌食症60例疗效观察[J];儿科药学杂志;2001年02期

8 高镜如,宋阿冬;推拿手穴治疗小儿厌食症42例[J];河北中医;2001年10期

9 刘惠武;中药治疗小儿厌食症100例[J];内蒙古中医药;2001年01期

10 王慎明 ,孙晋芳 ,张慧娟;辨证治疗小儿厌食症[J];实用中医内科杂志;2001年04期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 林启声;;“u&胃醒脾法”治疗小儿厌食症的研究[A];中华中医药学会学术年会——创新优秀论文集[C];2002年

2 李志刚;;“健儿消食糖浆”治疗小儿厌食症97例临床报道[A];刘弼臣教授从医六十五周年学术思想研讨会暨中华中医药学会儿科分会与全国中医药高等教育学会儿科分会全国学术交流大会论文汇编[C];2004年

3 吴敏;顾美琴;;“消食健儿糖浆”治疗小儿厌食症疗效观察[A];中西医结合第九次全国儿科学术会议论文汇编[C];2000年

4 黄映君;刁本恕;;刁本恕老师治疗小儿厌食症经验[A];第23届全国中医儿科学术研讨会暨儿科名中医讲习班论文汇编[C];2006年

5 史颖;陈泉清;;推拿治疗小儿厌食症74例疗效分析[A];第25届全国中医儿科学术研讨会暨中医药高等教育儿科教学研究会会议学术论文集[C];2008年

6 何雯;张瑛;李檬;;李家凤治疗小儿厌食症经验[A];第25届全国中医儿科学术研讨会暨中医药高等教育儿科教学研究会会议学术论文集[C];2008年

7 王大铖;;运通扶润四法治疗小儿厌食症[A];第25届全国中医儿科学术研讨会暨中医药高等教育儿科教学研究会会议学术论文集[C];2008年

8 原晓风;李丹;;小儿厌食症的治疗[A];2009年全国中医药科普高层论坛论文集[C];2009年

9 曾福元;;枳实与白术在炮制上的改进——附60例小儿厌食症治疗[A];’98全国中药研究暨中药房管理学术研讨会论文汇编[C];1998年

10 高慧英;陈美传;张民觉;林胡春;;硫酸锌治疗小儿厌食症——170例疗效分析[A];中国营养学会首届微量元素专题讨论会论文摘要汇编[C];1985年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 周颖;推拿治疗小儿厌食症研究有进展[N];中国中医药报;2008年

2 张智;治小儿厌食症方[N];民族医药报;2002年

3 钱玉和;治小儿厌食症民间方[N];民族医药报;2008年

4 贺雷;醒脾养儿颗粒治疗小儿厌食症110例疗效观察[N];农村医药报(汉);2009年

5 特约记者 王振岭;小儿厌食症发病相关因素被揭示[N];家庭医生报;2003年

6 冯瑶;“春补”也要孩子“消受”得了[N];家庭医生报;2004年

7 晏霏;小儿厌食症的药膳疗法[N];中国中医药报;2006年

8 天津 敖杰;腹部按摩治疗小儿厌食症[N];家庭医生报;2004年

9 本报特约记者 章彤;善治小儿厌食症的中医专家[N];上海中医药报;2002年

10 北京儿童医院;各种因素引起小儿厌食症[N];医药养生保健报;2006年

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 彭锦桓;小儿推拿疗法治疗小儿厌食症的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2015年

2 杜永平;宝宝乐口服液治疗小儿厌食症中枢机制的研究[D];第一军医大学;2006年

3 曹建雄;开胃进食汤超微颗粒治疗小儿厌食症临床疗效及其抗厌食作用之研究[D];湖南中医药大学;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 李兰丽;捏脊八法治疗脾胃气虚型小儿厌食症的临床疗效观察[D];福建中医药大学;2015年

2 郎俊凤;小儿厌食症病例对照研究[D];泰山医学院;2014年

3 张玉;运脾开胃汤联合葡萄糖酸锌治疗小儿厌食症的临床观察[D];河北医科大学;2015年

4 高原;针灸治疗小儿厌食症的Meta分析[D];甘肃中医药大学(原名:甘肃中医学院);2015年

5 蒋梦霞;消食口服液治疗小儿脾胃不和型厌食症的临床及实验研究[D];湖北中医药大学;2015年

6 韩冬梅;温胆枳术汤治疗小儿厌食症(脾胃湿热型)临床观察[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2016年

7 徐晓丽;耳穴贴压治疗脾胃不和型小儿厌食症的临床研究[D];山东中医药大学;2014年

8 杨华;健脾和胃推拿法治疗小儿厌食症的临床研究[D];云南中医学院;2016年

9 李玮琪;五指禅音康复手道治疗小儿厌食症的研究[D];广州中医药大学;2016年

10 张燕;腹部九法为主治疗小儿胃脘积滞型厌食症的临床观察[D];安徽中医药大学;2016年



本文编号:1845310

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/eklw/1845310.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户df34c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com