当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 儿科论文 >

调脾合剂联合刺四缝治疗小儿厌食症脾运失健证的临床疗效观察

发布时间:2018-12-12 10:13
【摘要】:目的和意义:观察刺四缝及调脾合剂治疗小儿厌食症脾运失健证的临床疗效。通过临床研究获得外治法结合口服中成药比单纯用口服中成药治疗小儿厌食症的优越性,进一步丰富治疗小儿厌食症的内容,为临床常见、影响儿童健康的小儿厌食症研究出有效、安全、便于推广应用的中医治疗方法。 研究方法:所有病例来自江苏省中医院儿科门诊,采用随机对照试验设计法,将受试病例按1:1比例随机分为试验组和对照组(试验组30例,对照组30例),试验组采用调脾合剂联合刺四缝治疗:调脾合剂(苍术280g,佩兰280g,陈皮128g,炙内金128g,炒山楂280g,蔗糖80g)口服,刺四缝是用三棱针刺入患儿双手四缝约1分深,挤出淡黄色液体;对照组单纯采用调脾合剂口服治疗。调脾合剂用量用法为小于1岁儿童每次5mL,1~3岁儿童每次10mL,3~6岁儿童每次15mL,大于6岁儿童每次20mL,均每日3次,口服,2周为1个疗程,治疗2个疗程。刺四缝用法为1周点刺1次,2周为1个疗程,治疗2个疗程。 结果:治疗组痊愈14例,占46.7%,显效8例,占26.7%,进步5例,占16.6%,无效3例,占10.0%,总有效率90.0%;对照组痊愈7例,占23.3%,显效7例,占23.3%,进步3例,占10.0%,无效13例,占43.4%,总有效率56.6%;两组比较,在总体疗效上,P0.05,差异有统计学意义;两组治疗后患儿血红蛋白及微量元素锌变化量比较,差异有显著统计学意义(P0.05),治疗组在主症即改善食欲、食量程度上均优于对照组,在次症即面色、形体消瘦程度、舌象、脉象等方面改善程度上亦优于对照组,说明治疗组对小儿厌食症治疗的临床疗效均优于对照组。另外两组患儿治疗期间均没有出现严重不良反应。 结论:通过临床研究,外治法联合口服中成药治疗组的疗效明显优于单纯口服中成药对照组,有显著统计学意义(P0.05)。而且针刺四缝穴方法日益体现出其祖国医学的优势,简单、易于操作、疗效肯定,方便推广。
[Abstract]:Objective and significance: to observe the clinical effect of Siniao and Tiaopi mixture in treating children anorexia. The advantages of external therapy combined with oral Chinese patent medicine in the treatment of infantile anorexia were obtained through clinical research. It is common in clinic to enrich the content of treatment of infantile anorexia. Infantile anorexia, which affects children's health, has developed effective, safe and convenient traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment. Methods: all the cases came from the pediatric outpatient department of Jiangsu Provincial traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital. The patients were randomly divided into the trial group (30 cases in the experimental group, 30 cases in the control group) and the control group (30 cases in the control group) according to the 1:1 ratio. The experimental group was treated with Tiaopi mixture combined with four seams: Tiaopi mixture (280g Atractylodes, 280g Perrin, 128g Chen Pei, 128g broiled Hawthorn, 280g sucrose). Extrusion of yellowish liquid; The control group was treated with Tiaopi mixture orally. The dosage of Tiaopi mixture was as follows: the dosage of Tiaopi mixture was 15 mL / time in children aged less than 1 year old and 20 mL / time in children aged 10 mL / 3 and 20 mL / time in children aged less than 6 years. The dosage of Tiaopi mixture was taken orally, 2 weeks as a course of treatment for 2 courses of treatment. Four seams were used as 1 week prick, 2 weeks as a course of treatment, 2 courses of treatment. Results: in the treatment group, 14 cases were cured (46.7%), 8 cases (26.7%) were markedly effective, 5 cases (16.6%) were improved, 3 cases (10.0%) were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 90.0%. In the control group, 7 cases were cured (23. 3%), 7 cases were markedly effective (23. 3%), 3 cases were improved, 13 cases were ineffective, 13 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 56. 6%. Compared with the two groups, the overall curative effect, P0.05, the difference was statistically significant; The changes of hemoglobin and trace element zinc in the two groups were significantly different after treatment (P0.05). In the treatment group, the appetite was improved and the amount of food was better than that in the control group. The improvement of tongue and pulse was better than that of the control group, which indicated that the treatment group was superior to the control group in the treatment of infantile anorexia. In the other two groups, there was no serious adverse reaction during the treatment. Conclusion: through the clinical research, the curative effect of external treatment combined with oral Chinese patent medicine treatment group is obviously better than that of the simple oral Chinese patent medicine control group, which has significant statistical significance (P0.05). And the method of acupuncture on Sijiao points is more and more superior in traditional Chinese medicine, which is simple, easy to operate, effective and easy to popularize.
【学位授予单位】:南京中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:R272

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 安浚;龙远适;;厌食散治疗小儿厌食症400例疗效观察[J];实用中医药杂志;1989年01期

2 唐赤蓉;推揉夹脊与背部俞穴治疗小儿厌食症30例[J];江苏中医药;1990年08期

3 钟爱芬;;中医药治疗小儿厌食症近况[J];中医药信息;1992年06期

4 曹宏,曹海英;小儿厌食症论治4法[J];山西中医;1996年02期

5 孙安达,董桂芳;捏脊为主手法治疗小儿厌食症58例[J];中国民间疗法;1996年04期

6 林启声;游源渊;林芬;;u&胃醒脾法治疗小儿厌食症100例临床观察[J];福建中医学院学报;1996年01期

7 杨波;推拿治疗小儿厌食症64例临床分析[J];按摩与导引;1999年01期

8 杨碧;小儿厌食症诊治体会[J];湖南中医药导报;2000年10期

9 郭元春;陈有海;;中西药结合治疗小儿厌食症25例体会[J];青海医药杂志;2008年04期

10 孟昭群;;小儿厌食症外敷验方[J];家庭医学;2010年06期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 杨建福;;小儿厌食症及对策[A];玉溪市第十五届儿科年会论文集[C];2009年

2 许春娣;邵彩虹;童美琴;李在玲;丘小汕;郑跃杰;武庆斌;郝理华;;培菲康治疗小儿厌食症的临床疗效观察[A];第六届全国儿科微生态学学术会议暨儿科微生态学新进展学习班资料汇编[C];2008年

3 陈会芳;;综合治疗小儿厌食症92例临床观察[A];中华中医药学会脾胃病分会第二十三次全国脾胃病学术交流会论文汇编[C];2011年

4 王素梅;田建东;郝宏文;吴力群;张虹;崔霞;郑军;李荣辉;陈美娟;;辨证取穴推拿治疗小儿厌食症165例临床观察[A];第28次全国中医儿科学术大会暨2011年名老中医治疗(儿科)疑难病临床经验高级专修班论文汇编[C];2011年

5 陈军林;蔡忠钦;钟日荣;;小儿厌食症中西医结合治疗[A];中西医结合第九次全国儿科学术会议论文汇编[C];2000年

6 张建芬;;小儿厌食症的中医治疗概况[A];中国中西医结合学会第十二次全国消化系统疾病学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2000年

7 赵越平;杜永平;;宝宝乐口服液质量标准及治疗小儿厌食症临床观察[A];全国中西医结合儿科第十次学术会议论文集[C];2002年

8 林启声;;“u&胃醒脾法”治疗小儿厌食症的研究[A];中华中医药学会学术年会——创新优秀论文集[C];2002年

9 陈q,

本文编号:2374384


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/eklw/2374384.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户98252***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com