超声引导下经皮射频消融与微波消融治疗原发性肝细胞癌的比较
本文关键词: 癌 肝细胞 超声检查 导管消融术 微波 出处:《中国医学影像学杂志》2015年08期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:目的探讨超声引导下经皮射频消融与微波消融治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效。资料与方法选择超声引导下消融治疗的92例(116个病灶)原发性肝细胞癌患者,随机分为射频消融组(46例)和微波消融组(46例),分别给予射频消融和微波消融治疗,比较两组患者消融术中消融点数、消融时间、完全消融率、局部肿瘤进展率、术后并发症、术后住院时间、住院费用以及术后1年、2年、3年复发率及无复发生存率。结果两组术中平均消融点数差异无统计学意义(P0.05),微波消融组术中消融时间明显短于射频消融组(P0.01)。两组肿瘤完全消融率和局部肿瘤进展率差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组肿瘤直径3 cm者、肿瘤直径3~5 cm者、近血管肿瘤的完全消融率和局部肿瘤进展率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后发热发生率、肝区疼痛发生率及平均住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。微波消融组平均住院费用明显低于射频消融组(P0.01)。两组术后1年、2年、3年累计复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组总体无复发生存率以及不同大小肿瘤无复发生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论微波消融治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床疗效及安全性与射频消融相当。射频消融治疗对较小的肿瘤有更好的治疗效果,微波消融治疗对中等或较大的肿瘤及近血管肿瘤具有一定的优势。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ultrasound guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The patients were randomly divided into radiofrequency ablation group (n = 46) and microwave ablation group (n = 46). The number of ablation points, ablation time, complete ablation rate, local tumor progression rate and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative hospital stay, Results there was no significant difference in mean ablation points between the two groups (P 0.05). The ablation time in microwave ablation group was significantly shorter than that in radiofrequency ablation group (P 0.01). There was no significant difference in total ablation rate and local tumor progression rate between the two groups (P 0.05). The diameter of the tumor was 3 cm in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the complete ablation rate and the local tumor progression rate between the two groups with a diameter of 3 ~ 5 cm. The incidence of postoperative fever, liver pain and average length of stay were compared between the two groups. The average hospitalization cost of microwave ablation group was significantly lower than that of radiofrequency ablation group (P 0.01). The cumulative recurrence rate was 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after operation in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). The overall recurrence free survival rate and the recurrence free survival rate of different size tumors were compared between the two groups. Conclusion the clinical efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for primary hepatocellular carcinoma is similar to that of radiofrequency ablation. Microwave ablation has some advantages over medium or larger tumors and proximal vascular tumors.
【作者单位】: 青岛市中心医院肿瘤介入科;青岛市市立医院超声科;
【分类号】:R445.1;R735.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 ;原发性肝癌的临床诊断与分期标准[J];肝脏;2004年S1期
2 袁强;王毅军;经翔;丁建民;杜智;;微波消融治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤的临床价值[J];中国肿瘤临床;2012年15期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 狄纪君;郭卫东;杨仁杰;;肝癌靶向热消融联合治疗的现状和进展[J];当代医学;2009年23期
2 李建高;樊必夫;管丽华;钱芳;王翔谕;;慢性乙型肝炎、肝硬化、肝癌患者血清IL-8、IL-10和leptin水平变化及其临床意义[J];放射免疫学杂志;2012年02期
3 韩蕾;文小平;王文玲;周石;黄韵红;;介入治疗、三维适形放疗与氩氦刀治疗原发性肝癌的临床对比研究[J];贵州医药;2010年08期
4 乔桂芳;孙焕琴;李润青;刘宁;刘金花;王子康;张永宏;;乙型肝炎相关性肝癌患者血浆粒细胞集落刺激因子检测分析[J];北京医学;2013年03期
5 刘雪莲;杨见权;;脾功能亢进症治疗进展[J];实用肝脏病杂志;2013年04期
6 冉贵萍;杨国珍;方文;袁勇;张瑞霞;;血清GSTP1基因甲基化定量分析在肝细胞癌的早期诊断价值[J];国际检验医学杂志;2014年05期
7 刘宁;江娜;罗娜;乔桂芳;孙焕芹;刘金花;张永宏;;RANTES、MIP-1α、MIP-1β和MCP-1趋化因子在慢性肝病患者的水平[J];北京医学;2014年06期
8 胡兰英;张素芬;李巍;;肿瘤标志物联合检测在肝癌诊断中的临床意义[J];国际检验医学杂志;2015年17期
9 吴兴军;崔林;刘建军;周向荣;朱扣林;;TACE、PVE、HIFU序贯治疗原发性肝癌42例临床分析[J];肿瘤基础与临床;2010年01期
10 李辉;武明辉;宁培刚;史大鹏;王文玉;赵瑞娇;;CT引导下胸部经皮切割针与抽吸针穿刺活检效果比较[J];郑州大学学报(医学版);2009年04期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 焦德超;张福君;;经皮微波固化肝癌扩大消融范围的研究进展[A];中国(第七届)肿瘤微创治疗学术大会暨世界影像导引下肿瘤微创治疗学会成立筹备大会论文汇编[C];2011年
2 于晓玲;梁萍;董宝玮;程志刚;王e,
本文编号:1552144
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fangshe/1552144.html