无保护分娩技术在初产妇自然分娩中的应用研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 13:37

  本文关键词：无保护分娩技术在初产妇自然分娩中的应用研究　出处：《东南大学学报(医学版)》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 无保护分娩技术 会阴侧切术 会阴损伤 疼痛

【摘要】：目的:探讨无保护分娩技术在单胎初产妇分娩中的应用效果。方法:选择足月经阴道分娩的单胎初产妇为研究对象,将产妇随机分为无保护分娩技术组与会阴侧切术组,比较两组产妇在产后恢复、舒适感以及新生儿窒息率等方面的差异。结果:共有103例纳入研究,其中无保护分娩技术组52例,会阴侧切术组51例。两组产妇的产程时间、产时产后出血、新生儿窒息率等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);产后会阴伤口缝合时间、疼痛的发生率以及会阴损伤程度无保护分娩技术组与会阴侧切组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:无保护分娩技术能减轻产妇产后疼痛,减少会阴伤口缝合时间,降低会阴损伤程度,不增加产时、产后出血和新生儿窒息的发生风险。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of unprotected delivery technique in single birth. Methods: single primipara with full term vaginal delivery was selected as the object of study. The parturients were randomly divided into two groups: the unprotected delivery technique group and the perineal lateral resection group. The differences of postpartum recovery, comfort and neonatal asphyxia rate between the two groups were compared. Results: 103 cases were included in the study. There were 52 cases in unprotected delivery group and 51 cases in perineal lateral resection group. There was no significant difference in the time of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia rate between the two groups. Postpartum perineum wound suture time, the incidence of pain and perineum injury degree unprotected delivery technique group and perineal lateral resection group compared. Conclusion: unprotected delivery technology can reduce postpartum pain, reduce perineum wound suture time, reduce perineal injury, and do not increase the duration of labor. The risk of postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia.
【作者单位】： 东南大学附属中大医院妇产科;东南大学公共卫生学院;
【分类号】：R714.3
【正文快照】： 会阴切开是产科最常用的一种手术,可缩短第二产程,加速分娩。然而,会阴侧切术在发挥作用的同时,也带来了产后疼痛、出血等问题,影响产妇生活质量。因此,基于母婴安全性及产妇生活质量的考虑,临床工作者们提出了无保护分娩的概念。目前无保护分娩技术已逐渐被广大临床工作者接，

本文编号：1423822