活跃期起始点改变对产程处理的影响
本文选题:活跃期 切入点:产程 出处:《中国妇产科临床杂志》2015年02期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:目的探讨活跃期起始点改变对产程处理的影响。方法回顾性分析2009年1月—12月北京大学第一医院分娩的1 641例初产妇的临床资料。结果阴道分娩组宫口开大3、4、5、6cm为活跃期起始点,平均活跃期时间分别为(4.4±2.1)h、(3.0±1.9)h、(2.1±1.4)h和(1.4±0.9)h,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01)。不同起始点各组平均第二产程时间和新生儿出生体质量比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。阴道分娩组宫口开大3、4、5、6cm活跃期停滞发生率分别为25.3%(198/784)、10.7%(26/243)、4.4%(5/113)和0。剖宫产组宫口开大3、4、5、6cm活跃期停滞发生率分别为55.7%(78/140)、46.2%(18/39)、5/15和2/3。宫口开大6cm发生活跃期停滞者330例,其中229例阴道分娩(69.4%)。单纯以活跃期停滞为剖宫产手术指征者占40%(82/205),其中73.2%(60/82)为宫口开大3cm。结论宫口开大6cm之前活跃期停滞者,仍有阴道分娩机会;活跃期起始点改变可减少宫口开大3cm停滞者行剖宫产的比例。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of the change of the starting point of active phase on the treatment of labor. Methods the clinical data of 1 641 primipara delivered in Peking University first Hospital from January 2009 to December were analyzed retrospectively. The mean active period time was 4.4 卤2.1 h and 1.4 卤0.9 h, respectively, and the mean duration of the second stage of labor and the birth weight of the newborns at different starting points were significantly higher than those in the control group. The average time of the second stage of labor and the birth weight of the newborns were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). The incidence of active stagnation in the vaginal delivery group was 25. 3% and 25. 3% respectively. The incidence of active stagnation in the vagina delivery group was 25. 3% and 25. 3% respectively. In the caesarean section group, the incidence of active stagnation in the open opening of the uterus was 55.775 cm. The incidence of active stagnation in the vaginal delivery group was 55.7m, 78140cm, 46.218.1% 515 and 23%, respectively. There were 330 cases of active stagnation in the caesarean group with the opening of the uterus opening 6cm. There were 229 cases of vagina delivery with 69.4% of them. Only active stagnation was the indication of cesarean section (4082 / 205), of which 73.2 / 82 (60 / 82) was dilated for 3 cm. Conclusion there is still a chance of vaginal delivery for those with stagnation in active period before the opening of uterine mouth is 6 cm. The change of the starting point of active stage can reduce the proportion of cesarean section in the patients with 3 cm stagnation of opening.
【作者单位】: 北京大学第一医院妇产科;安徽省马鞍山市十七冶医院妇产科;
【分类号】:R714
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李秋莲,李红,兰桂芬;安定在活跃期延缓及停滞中的应用[J];中国妇幼保健;2005年10期
2 赵洁,路琰琰,李俊美;安桃乐分娩活跃期镇痛的临床观察[J];齐鲁护理杂志;2002年05期
3 张和英,戴然;复方利多卡因胶浆在解除分娩活跃期阵痛的应用[J];中国妇产科临床;2003年03期
4 尹爱淑;超声诊断在产科活跃期滞产中的应用[J];临床医学;2004年05期
5 谭章云;黄玉玲;李永芳;卢柳娟;赵雪芳;张碧苗;;斯帕丰应用于活跃期60例临床分析[J];赣南医学院学报;2006年02期
6 关冰;;人工扩张宫口缩短活跃期123例效果观察[J];中原医刊;2006年11期
7 黄蓓华;安定在产妇分娩活跃期的应用[J];新医学;1994年10期
8 李芳,桂尚志;山莨菪碱(654-2)在分娩活跃期的应用[J];现代中西医结合杂志;1998年04期
9 胡梦莹,方络芬;静脉注射安定缩短产妇分娩活跃期76例临床观察[J];中国妇幼保健;2005年10期
10 丁丽娟;;山莨菪碱缩短分娩活跃期的效果观察[J];医药导报;2006年08期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 翟凌;潘艳秋;孙晓雪;;蒂洛胺用于分娩活跃期应加速产程进展[A];纪念卓越的人民医学家林巧稚大夫诞辰100周年——全国妇产科高级学术论坛论文集[C];2001年
2 辛昕;彭敏;;斯帕丰促进第一产和活跃期的疗效观察[A];山东省护理学会妇产科学术交流会议论文汇编[C];2006年
3 章小维;马珂;董悦;;活跃期时限对分娩方式和妊娠结局的影响[A];中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议产科会场(产科学组、妊高症学组)论文汇编[C];2012年
4 张春英;李丽萍;;安定在临产后的应用[A];山东省护理学会妇产科学术交流会议论文汇编[C];2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 陈晓烨;活跃期至第二产程胎心监护异常图形与妊娠结局的关系探讨[D];福建医科大学;2014年
,本文编号:1626248
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/1626248.html