胎儿肾脏集合部分离的超声诊断及动态随访

发布时间：2018-03-28 17:02

  本文选题：超声检查　切入点：产前检查　出处：《中国医疗设备》2016年11期

【摘要】：目的探讨超声诊断胎儿肾盂分离的临床意义及产前肾盂宽度的变化趋势。方法回顾性分析中期妊娠行超声筛查的13500例孕妇中检出胎儿肾盂前后径宽度(Renal Pelvis Anteroposterior Diameter,RPAPD)≥4 mm且无其他畸形的114例胎儿超声资料。结果胎儿的RPAPD的大小与孕妇年龄之间无明显差异(P=0.062)0.05;中期妊娠胎儿单侧RPAPD72例(63.15%)多于胎儿双侧RPAPD42例(36.84%);分娩前胎儿单侧RPAPD10mm的有69例(66.35%)多于胎儿双侧RPAPD35例(33.65%);胎儿肾盂持续性进行性分离≥10 mm单侧3例(30%)少于双侧7(70%);分娩前RPAPD10 mm与持续性进行性RPAPD≥10 mm组间进行分类变量的卡方检验,P=0.00230.05,具有统计学意义。结论中期妊娠超声诊断单纯胎儿RPAPD(4~10 mm)的患者大部分在分娩前RPAPD10 mm,RPAPD≥10 mm的患者在分娩前持续性扩张。超声跟踪监测胎儿RPAPD,能及时准确提供产前信息。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical significance of ultrasound diagnosis of fetal renal pelvis separation and the change trend of prenatal renal pelvis width. Methods retrospective analysis was made on 13500 pregnant women who were screened by ultrasound in the second trimester pregnancy. The width of the fetal renal pelvis was more than or equal to that of Renal Pelvis Anteroposterior diameterrpd. Results there was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and pregnant women's age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. There was no significant difference between fetal RPAPD size and gestational age. 69 cases (66.35) were more than fetal bilateral RPAPD35 (33.65%), 3 cases of fetal renal pelvis continuous progressive separation 鈮，

本文编号：1677231