足月胎膜早破孕妇阴道微生态及B族链球菌感染情况与母儿结局的关系分析
本文选题:足月胎膜早破 + 阴道微生态 ; 参考:《重庆医科大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:通过分析比较足月胎膜早破和足月未破膜孕妇阴道微生态以及B族链球菌(GBS)感染情况,探究足月胎膜早破阴道微生态改变以及GBS感染与母儿结局的关系。方法:收集2015年01月到2016年03月在重庆医科大学附属第二医院产科住院生产的,足月胎膜早破孕妇74例为tPROM组。随机选取同期收治入院的正常足月未破膜孕妇74例为对照组。比较分析两组阴道微生态情况及母儿结局,将胎膜早破组中74例研究对象根据GBS感染情况及阴道微生态情况分为GBS阳性组、GBS阴性组、微生态正常组及微生态失调组,再分析比较四组的新生儿病理性黄疸、新生儿败血症、产褥感染的发生情况。结果:1.t PROM组孕妇在阴道微生态失调率、阴道pH异常(pH4.5)发生率、乳杆菌优势改变率明显大于对照组(p0.05),差异有统计学意义。2.t PROM组主要优势菌为G+球菌(39.18%),对照组主要优势菌为G+杆菌(52.70%)。3.tPROM组与对照组孕妇阴道分泌物病原微生物中BV、VVC、BV+VVC的发生率比较,差异都无统计学意义(p0.05)。两组GBS感染率相比较,两者的差异具有统计学意义(p0.05),其中tPROM组GBS感染为16.22%,对照组GBS感染为5.41%。4.tPROM组与对照组新生儿出生后1min、5min Apgar评分以及新生儿血气pH异常的比较,差异不具有统计学意义(p0.05),tPROM组新生儿病理性黄疸及产褥感染发生率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(p0.05)。5tPROM组中微生态正常组与失调组的母儿不良结局无差异(p0.05)6.tPROM组中GBS阳性组与阴性组新生儿血气p H异常发生率比较,差异并没有统计学意义(p0.05)。GBS阳性组新生儿病理性黄疸率及产妇产褥感染率都明显高于GBS阴性组,差异具有统计学意义(p0.05)。结论:足月胎膜早破孕妇阴道微环境稳态发生了改变,重点表现在乳杆菌优势改变、优势菌由G+杆菌变为G+球菌及阴道p H的改变;足月胎膜早破的发生可能与阴道微环境的改变、GBS的感染有关。足月胎膜早破的发生可能引起新生儿病理性黄疸及产褥感染的不良结局,而GBS的感染可能在其中发挥着很大的作用,其不良结局的发生与阴道微生态的失调关系不明显。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the vaginal microecology and group B streptococcus infection in pregnant women with term premature rupture of membranes and term unbroken membranes, and to explore the relationship between GBS infection and maternal and fetal outcome. Methods: from January 2015 to March 2016, 74 pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes were enrolled in tPROM group. 74 normal term unbroken pregnant women admitted to hospital at the same time were randomly selected as control group. According to GBS infection and vaginal microecology, 74 cases of premature rupture of membranes were divided into GBS positive group, normal group and microecological disorder group. The incidence of pathological jaundice, neonatal septicemia and puerperal infection in the four groups were analyzed and compared. Results 1. The misadjustment rate of vaginal microecology and pH of vaginal pH abnormality were 4.5% in PROM group. The dominant change rate of Lactobacillus was significantly higher than that of the control group (P 0.05). The difference was statistically significant. The main dominant bacteria in the PROM group was G cocci, and the main dominant bacteria in the control group was the G bacilli 52.70. 3. The incidence of BV VCCV VVC in vaginal secretions of pregnant women in the control group and the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant (P 0.05). The difference of GBS infection rate between the two groups was statistically significant (p 0.05). The GBS infection rate in tPROM group was 16.22, and the GBS infection in control group was Apgar score and abnormal blood gas pH at 1 min after birth between 5.41%.4.tPROM group and control group. The incidence of neonatal pathological jaundice and puerperal infection was higher in the group of p0.05 and tPROM than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in maternal and fetal adverse outcomes between microecologically normal group and maladjusted group in p0.05 + .5tPROM group. The incidence of abnormal blood gas pH in GBS positive group and negative group was higher than that in control group. The rate of pathological jaundice and puerperal infection rate of puerpera in the positive group were higher than those in the negative group of GBS, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: the stable state of vaginal microenvironment in pregnant women with premature rupture of term membranes has changed, especially in the changes of Lactobacillus dominant bacteria from G bacillus to G coccus and vaginal pH. The occurrence of term premature rupture of membranes may be related to the change of vaginal microenvironment and the infection of GBS. Premature rupture of full-term membranes may lead to pathological jaundice of newborns and adverse outcome of puerperal infection, and GBS infection may play a great role in it. The relationship between the occurrence of premature rupture of membranes and the imbalance of vaginal microecology is not obvious.
【学位授予单位】:重庆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R714.433
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐爽;姚晓燕;张瑞;;不足月胎膜早破的保守治疗[J];中国社区医师(医学专业);2010年21期
2 魏立艳;;足月胎膜早破分娩方式探讨[J];中国社区医师(医学专业半月刊);2008年12期
3 李向春;薜俐;;足月胎膜早破160例临床分析[J];实用预防医学;2010年03期
4 韦爱英;;足月胎膜早破与分娩方式[J];北方药学;2011年04期
5 马秀琴;叶凤云;刘玉玲;赵云霞;苏秀丽;张华;;108例足月胎膜早破的处理与预防[J];中国伤残医学;2013年05期
6 吕春秀;;420例足月胎膜早破的临床分析[J];中国医药指南;2013年16期
7 徐北兰;;足月胎膜早破原因及分娩结局的分析[J];广西医学;2013年09期
8 李春爱;不足月胎膜早破的诊断[J];国外医学.妇产科学分册;1996年02期
9 谢颖;;86例足月胎膜早破的临床分析[J];中国民族民间医药;2013年24期
10 吴海燕;郭桂莲;;足月胎膜早破108例临床分析[J];中国临床研究;2014年03期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 柴丽娅;金振杰;郭邑;;足月胎膜早破残余羊水量对分娩结局的影响[A];中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议产科会场(产科学组、妊高症学组)论文汇编[C];2012年
2 杨春艳;胡小平;李广清;;足月胎膜早破临床处理策略的前瞻性研究[A];中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议产科会场(产科学组、妊高症学组)论文汇编[C];2012年
3 贾兰珍;全莉梅;费小阳;;普贝生应用于足月胎膜早破引产[A];第四届长三角妇产科学术论坛暨浙江省2009年妇产科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
4 郑涛;王磊;金敏菲;潘琢如;;早产十年资料的回顾性分析[A];第三届长三角围产医学学术论坛暨2006年浙江省围产医学学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 蔡琴;足月胎膜早破孕妇阴道微生态及B族链球菌感染情况与母儿结局的关系分析[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
2 魏伟;200例足月胎膜早破临床分析[D];郑州大学;2012年
3 卞显凤;探讨C反应蛋白、白介素6与检测足月胎膜早破感染的关系[D];皖南医学院;2013年
,本文编号:1937784
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/1937784.html