不同分娩方式与产后早期盆底肌电值、肌力变化关系研究

发布时间：2018-07-07 09:41

  本文选题：盆底功能障碍性疾病 + 阴道分娩　； 参考：《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》2017年12期

【摘要】：目的探讨不同分娩方式与产后早期盆底肌肉肌电值、肌力变化的关系。方法选择2014年1月至2015年1月妊娠36~38周于中国医科大学附属盛京医院门诊产检、于盆底治疗中心行产前产后盆底功能检测、并符合纳入标准与排除标准的329例产妇为研究对象,按照分娩方式不同将所有产妇分为选择性剖宫产组162例与阴道分娩组167例,其中阴道分娩组分为会阴侧切组84例与非侧切组83例。分别对产妇分娩前、产后6周、产后3个月、产后5个月的盆底肌肉肌电值、Ⅰ类肌肌力与Ⅱ类肌肌力进行测定。结果剖宫产组与阴道分娩组产后6周及3、5个月比较,除产后6周两组肌电位活力值间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)外,其余各时间点各组肌电值相比较,剖宫产组均明显高于阴道分娩组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。阴道分娩组中,会阴侧切组与非侧切组产后6周及3、5个月比较,两组间各项肌电值差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。而在产后6周及3、5个月3次复查中,剖宫产组Ⅰ类肌肌力分别下降32.26%、35.48%、27.42%,Ⅱ类肌肌力分别下降61.29%、54.84%、46.77%;阴道分娩组Ⅰ类肌肌力分别下降41.79%、52.24%、46.27%;Ⅱ类肌肌力分别下降71.64%、70.15%、62.69%。会阴侧切组Ⅰ类肌肌力分别下降41.17%、52.94%、44.12%;Ⅱ类肌肌力分别下降79.41%、76.47%、52.94%;非侧切组Ⅰ类肌肌力分别下降42.42%、51.52%、39.39%,Ⅱ类肌肌力分别下降63.64%、63.64%、51.52%。无论剖宫产组与阴道分娩组,还是会阴侧切组与非侧切组,盆底Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类肌肌力下降发生率在组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论剖宫产对早期肌电值的影响较阴道分娩小,对盆底肌力的影响与阴道分娩相比差异不大;会阴侧切无法减轻对产后盆底肌肉功能的影响;盆底肌肉肌电值与肌力在评价产后早期盆底功能时可能不具有同步性。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between different delivery modes and the changes of myoelectric value and muscle strength of pelvic floor in early postpartum. Methods from January 2014 to January 2015, 36-week pregnancy was performed at Shengjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University, and the pelvic floor function was detected in the pelvic floor treatment center. 329 pregnant women who met the criteria of inclusion and exclusion were selected as the study objects. All parturients were divided into selective cesarean section group (n = 162) and vaginal delivery group (n = 167) according to different delivery methods. Among them, vaginal delivery group (n = 84) was divided into perineal lateral resection group (n = 84) and non-lateral incision group (n = 83). Before delivery, 6 weeks after delivery, 3 months after delivery, 5 months after delivery, the pelvic floor muscle electrical value, class I muscle strength and class 鈪，

本文编号：2104563