当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 妇产科论文 >

B超引导与传统手法阴部神经阻滞治疗女性阴部神经痛的比较

发布时间:2018-09-12 08:11
【摘要】:目的探讨B超引导阴部神经阻滞(pudendal nerve block,PNB)与传统阴部神经阻滞治疗女性阴部神经痛的疗效。方法回顾性分析2012年11月~2016年8月在我院就诊并接受阴部神经阻滞的40例阴部神经痛的资料,其中19例行B超引导下阴部神经阻滞(B超组),21例行传统阴部神经阻滞(传统组)。根据疼痛缓解情况进行1~3次神经阻滞。治疗前、第一次治疗后24 h和治疗结束3个月采用视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)评估疼痛情况。结果 2组第一次治疗后24 h、治疗结束后3个月的疼痛VAS均显著低于治疗前(P=0.000),B超组治疗后24 h疼痛VAS较传统组更低(Z=-2.451,P=0.014),治疗后3个月2组无显著性差异(Z=-0.542,P=0.588)。主要不良反应及并发症:臀部及下肢麻木在B超组为31.6%(6/19),传统组为0(0/21),二者差异有统计学意义(Fisher检验,P=0.007);头晕在B超组为5.3%(1/19),传统组为38.1%(8/21),二者差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.427,P=0.035)。结论 B超引导与传统手法阴部神经阻滞治疗女性阴部神经痛均有效,2组在治疗结束后3个月疼痛治疗效果无显著差异。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of B-ultrasound guided pudendal nerve block (pudendal nerve block,PNB) and traditional pudendal nerve block on female pudendal neuralgia. Methods the data of 40 cases of pudendal neuralgia treated in our hospital from November 2012 to August 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 19 cases were treated with B-ultrasound guided pudendal nerve block (B-ultrasound group) and 21 cases were treated with traditional pudendal nerve block (traditional group). According to the pain relief, 1 and 3 times of nerve block were performed. Before treatment, 24 hours after the first treatment and 3 months after treatment, the pain was assessed by visual analogue score (visual analog scale,VAS). Results the VAS of group B was significantly lower than that of group B at 24 h after the first treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment (P0. 000). The VAS of group B was lower than that of the traditional group at 24 h after the first treatment (ZP0. 451P0. 014), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 3 months after treatment (Z-0. 542P0. 588). The main adverse reactions and complications were: hip and lower extremity numbness was 31.6% (6 / 19) in B ultrasonic group and 0 / 21 (0 / 21) in traditional group, the difference was statistically significant (Fisher test P0. 007), dizziness was 5. 3% (1 / 19) in B ultrasonic group and 38. 1% (8 / 21) in traditional group (蠂 2 4. 427 P 0. 035). Conclusion there is no significant difference between the two groups in the treatment of female pudendal neuralgia under the guidance of B-ultrasound and traditional manipulation of pudendal nerve block in 3 months after treatment.
【作者单位】: 北京大学第三医院妇产科;北京大学第三医院疼痛科;北京大学第三医院超声科;
【分类号】:R711

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 冯星玮;丁燕琴;;双侧阴部神经阻滞在阴道分娩中的应用及其对母婴的影响[J];医学信息;2009年08期

2 董相兰,范丽梅,张馨;双侧阴部神经阻滞及局部浸润麻醉1560例临床对比观察[J];吉林医学;1999年01期

3 兰香;周勤燕;黎萍;徐慧敏;傅向红;邵雪泉;;双侧阴部神经阻滞加局部浸润麻醉用于阴道分娩镇痛的研究[J];中国妇幼保健;2009年07期

4 纪烈辰;俞林;;阴部神经阻滞在痔手术中的应用[J];结直肠肛门外科;2011年04期

5 王涛;罗曼;陈硕;李玉玮;;阴部神经阻滞用于混合痔术后镇痛的临床观察[J];中华结直肠疾病电子杂志;2014年02期

6 李静辉,穆禹;阴部神经阻滞减少软产道损伤的效果观察[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2002年17期

7 王志勇;孙留生;刘素萍;;骶管麻醉与阴部神经阻滞在肛肠科的临床应用比较[J];中国社区医师(医学专业);2011年21期

8 王亚琴;刘小青;朱秋群;;第二产程中阴部神经阻滞探讨[J];中国误诊学杂志;2011年03期

9 郭靖;韩长珍;霍爱萍;;阴部神经阻滞与会阴局部浸润麻醉的应用[J];基层医学论坛;2011年14期

10 卢施吏;;阴部神经阻滞阴道扩张法在分娩中的应用[J];中国社区医师(综合版);2005年05期



本文编号:2238424

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2238424.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户78378***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com