当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 妇产科论文 >

农村妇女孕期肥胖对妊娠结局的影响

发布时间:2019-05-22 13:03
【摘要】:目的:调查禹城市人民医院产一科住院分娩的农村妇女孕期肥胖情况,分析其对母婴结局的影响,探讨孕期管理体重的方法以降低不良妊娠结局,保障母儿安全。方法:本研究采用回顾性队列研究,于孕妇住院期间,通过查阅孕期保健手册和住院病历以及与孕妇会谈的方式获得相关信息,如孕妇年龄、身高、孕前体重、分娩前体重及母婴结局等,由经过培训的调查员填写本研究专用的《农村孕妇妊娠、分娩情况调查表》,收集资料完整的单胎妊娠农村初产妇896例。根据孕前BMI将孕妇分为孕前消瘦组(BMI18.5kg/m2;n=62)、孕前体重正常组(18.5 kg/m2≤BMI24 kg/m2;n=601)、孕前超重组(24 kg/m2≤BMI28 kg/m2;n=176)、孕前肥胖组(BMI≥28kg/mm2;n=57)。按孕期总增重15kg,孕期BMI增幅≥6为孕期体重增加过度为切点将孕妇分为孕期体重增加适宜组及孕期体重增长过度组。比较分析各组孕妇孕期肥胖情况对母婴结局的影响。所有数据均利用SPSS19.0统计学软件进行分析和处理。结果:1.对母体的影响:孕前超重+肥胖组与孕前体重正常组相比,孕期体重增长过度组与孕期体重增加适宜组相比,其妊娠期高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病、剖宫产、产后出血的发生率均明显增加。在妊娠期高血压疾病的发生率上,孕前超重+肥胖组是孕前正常体重组的5.956倍(0R,5.956;95%%CI,3.474-10.213),孕期体重增长过度组是孕期体重增加适宜组的2.777倍(OR,2.777;95%CI,1.558-4.950);在妊娠期糖尿病的发生率上,孕前超重+肥胖组是孕前正常体重组的4.212倍(0R,4.212;95%CI,2.547-6.964),孕期体重增长过度组是孕期体重增加适宜组的3.084倍(0R,3.084;95%CI,1.741-5.466);在剖宫产的发生率上,孕前超重+肥胖组是孕前正常体重组的2.871倍(0R,2.871;95%CI,2.103-3.919),孕期体重增长过度组是孕期体重增加适宜组的3.317倍(OR,3.317;95%CI,2.470-4.456);在产后出血的发生率上,孕前超重+肥胖组是孕前正常体重组的5.234倍(0R,5.234;95%CI,2.919-9.385),孕期体重增长过度组是孕期体重增加适宜组的2.914倍(0R,2.914;95%CI,1.580-5.374)。经卡方检验,差异显著,均有统计学意义(P0.01)。2.对胎儿的影响:孕前超重+肥胖组与孕前体重正常组相比,孕期体重增长过度组与孕期体重增加适宜组相比,其巨大儿发生率明显增加,孕前超重+肥胖组是孕前正常体重组的9.454倍(0R,9.454;95%CI,6.342-14.093),孕期体重增长过度组是孕期体重增加适宜组的5.108倍(0R,5.108;95%CI,3.248-8.034),经卡方检验,差异显著,有统计学意义(P0.01);孕前肥胖者新生儿窒息的发生率是孕前体重正常的0.790倍(0R,0.790;95%CI,0.255-2.448),经卡方检验无统计学意义(X2=0.168,P0.05),孕期体重增加过度者新生儿窒息的发生率是孕期体重增加适宜的1.755倍(0R,1.755;95%CI,0.750-4.110),经卡方检验无统计学意义(X2=1.721,P0,05)。3.孕前超重及肥胖组中,孕期体重增长过度发生妊娠期高血压、妊娠期糖尿病、剖宫产、产后出血、巨大儿的风险分别是孕期体重增长适宜的1.24倍(95%CI,1.113-1.388)、1.14倍(95%CI,1.023-1.280)、1.37倍(95%CI,1.029-1.833)、1.13倍(95%CI,1.019-1.243)、2.05倍(95%CI,1.653-2.545),经检验有统计学意义。4.孕前超重+肥胖组与孕前体重正常组相比,孕期体重增长过度组与孕期体重增长适宜组相比,因巨大儿行剖宫产的风险均增加,经卡方检验,有统计学意义(P0.01;P0.05);因难产行剖宫产的风险均降低,经卡方检验,差异显著,有统计学意义(P0.01);而因妊娠期高血压疾病、胎儿窘迫、胎位不正行剖宫产的风险两组差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:孕前肥胖与孕期体重增长过度增加了妊娠期高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病、剖宫产、产后出血、巨大儿的发生率,是导致农村孕妇不良妊娠结局的危险因素。为了母婴健康,应加强农村肥胖孕妇的体重管理,包括孕前及孕期体重增长,将体重控制在适宜标准范围内,以降低妊娠不良结局的发生。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate the situation of the obesity of rural women who have been hospitalized in the hospital of Yucheng People's Hospital and to analyze their influence on the outcome of mother-to-child and to explore the methods of the management of body weight during pregnancy to reduce the outcome of the poor pregnancy and to guarantee the safety of the mother and child. Methods: The retrospective cohort study was used in this study to obtain relevant information, such as the age, height, weight of the pregnant woman, the weight before delivery and the outcome of the mother and child, during the period of the pregnant woman's stay in the hospital. The survey of pregnant and delivery of pregnant women in rural pregnant women, which was dedicated to the study, was completed by trained investigators, and 896 cases of single-pregnancy rural women with complete information were collected. The pregnant women were divided into the pregestational age group (BMI18.5 kg/ m2; n = 62) according to the pre-pregnancy BMI; the normal weight of the pregestational weight (18.5 kg/ m2; BMI24 kg/ m2; n = 601); the pre-pregnancy super-recombinant (24 kg/ m2; BMI28 kg/ m2; n = 176); and the pregestational obesity group (BMI = 28 kg/ mm2; n = 57). According to the total weight gain of 15 kg during pregnancy and the increase of BMI in pregnant period, the pregnant women were divided into the appropriate group of weight gain during pregnancy and the weight gain of the pregnant women during pregnancy. The effect of the weight of the pregnant women on the mother-to-child outcome was compared and analyzed. All data were analyzed and processed using the SPSS19.0 statistical software. Results:1. The influence of the maternal body: the pre-pregnancy overweight + obese group and the pre-pregnant body weight normal group, the weight gain of the pregnant women increased over the pre-pregnancy weight gain group, the pregnancy-induced hypertension disease, the gestational diabetes, the cesarean section and the post-partum hemorrhage increased significantly compared with the suitable group in the pre-pregnancy weight gain group. The pre-pregnancy overweight + obesity group was 5.956 times (0R, 5.956;95% CI, 3.474-10.213) of the pre-pregnancy normal body, and the weight gain during pregnancy was 2.777-fold (OR, 2.777;95% CI, 1.558-4.950) in the appropriate group during pregnancy, and the rate of gestational diabetes, The pre-pregnancy overweight + obesity group was 4.212-fold (0R, 4.212;95% CI, 2.547-6.964) of the normal body of pre-pregnancy, and the weight-increasing group during pregnancy was 3.084-fold (0R, 3.084;95% CI, 1.741-5.466) in the appropriate group during pregnancy; at the rate of cesarean section, The pre-pregnancy overweight + obesity group was 2.871-fold (0R, 2.871;95% CI, 2.103-3.919) of the normal body of pre-pregnancy, and the weight-increasing group during pregnancy was 3.317-fold (OR, 3.317;95% CI, 2.470-4.456) in the appropriate group during pregnancy, and in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, The pre-pregnancy overweight + obesity group was 5.234-fold (0R, 5.234;95% CI, 2.919-9.385) of the pre-pregnancy normal body, and the weight gain during pregnancy was 2.914-fold (0R, 2.914;95% CI, 1.580-5.374) in the appropriate group during pregnancy. The difference was significant in Chi-square test (P0.01). The effect on the fetus: compared with the normal group in the pre-pregnant and overweight + obese group, the high incidence of the large infant in the pre-pregnant and overweight + obese group was 9.454-fold (0R, 9.454;95% CI, 6.342-14.093) of the pre-pregnancy normal body. The weight gain during pregnancy was 5.108-fold (0R, 5.108;95% CI, 3.248-8.034) in the appropriate group during pregnancy, and the difference was significant in the chi-square test (P0.01); the incidence of neonatal asphyxia in the pregestational obesity was 0.790-fold (0R, 0.790;95% CI, 0.255-2.448) of the pre-pregnancy weight. No statistical significance was found in the chi-square test (X2 = 0.168, P0.05). The incidence of neonatal asphyxia was 1.755 times (0R, 1.755;95% CI, 0.750-4.110) of weight gain during pregnancy, and no statistical significance was found in the chi-square test (X2 = 1.721, P0.05). The risk of over-pregnancy, gestational diabetes, cesarean section, and post-partum hemorrhage during pregnancy was 1.24-fold (95% CI, 1.113-1.388), 1.14-fold (95% CI, 1.023-1.280), 1.37-fold (95% CI, 1.029-1.833), 1.13-fold (95% CI, 1.019-1.243), 2.05 times (95% CI, 1.653-2.545), with statistical significance. In the pre-pregnant and overweight + obese group, compared with the normal group in the pre-pregnant weight group, the weight gain in the pregnant period increased with the appropriate group in the pre-pregnancy weight-increasing group, and the risk of the caesarean section in the large-child line increased, and the result of the chi-square test is statistically significant (P0.01; P0.05); and the risk of the cesarean section is reduced due to the difficult production line, The difference between the two groups was significant (P0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: The pre-pregnancy obesity and the increase of the weight of the pregnant women have increased the pregnancy-induced hypertension, the gestational diabetes, the cesarean section, the post-partum hemorrhage, the incidence of the great child, which is the risk factor leading to the poor pregnancy outcome of the pregnant women in the rural areas. In order to mother and child health, the weight management of pregnant women in rural areas should be strengthened, including pre-pregnancy and body weight increase, and the body weight should be controlled within a suitable standard to reduce the occurrence of poor pregnancy outcomes.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R714

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 季玉光;;孕期体重要控制[J];农家参谋;2006年04期

2 孙凌香;;孕期体重变化&饮食要点[J];中国优生优育;2013年06期

3 孙欢欢;王丹;;孕期体重指数及其增长对分娩方式的影响[J];黑龙江医学;2008年08期

4 虞慧君;廖晓琼;陈晓菲;;孕产妇对孕期体重认知行为的调查分析及对策[J];中国优生与遗传杂志;2009年04期

5 祁志宇;陈慧春;;孕期体重状况对巨大儿发生率及分娩结局的影响[J];中国妇幼保健;2009年36期

6 杜鹃;奚琦;刘学敏;靳祖群;张丽娟;;我国北方地区单胎足月初产妇孕期体重增长适宜范围[J];中国妇幼保健;2011年14期

7 朴海善;赵燕楠;罗惠琴;田玲;李胜玲;;初产妇孕期体重增长对分娩方式及新生儿体重的影响[J];宁夏医科大学学报;2013年11期

8 依晓;;孕期体重有讲究[J];家庭医学(新健康);2007年01期

9 大豆妈;;孕期体重日志[J];母婴世界;2008年10期

10 史可;;忽高忽低?孕期体重规律告诉你[J];健康生活(下半月);2009年07期

相关会议论文 前9条

1 ;体验·学习·干预——呵护完美孕程 孕期体重管理·2010学术论坛报道[A];中国营养学会妇幼营养第七次全国学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

2 陈倩;;孕期体重管理[A];全国妇产科新技术、新理论进展研讨会、全国助产专业护士培训班论文汇编[C];2011年

3 刘燕萍;李宁;陈伟;李杰;刘鹏举;刘莉;;妊娠糖尿病孕晚期血脂特点及与孕期体重变化的关系[A];营养健康新观察(第三十六期):膳食营养与代谢专题[C];2007年

4 崔璀;张振华;孙忠清;钟春梅;汪之顼;;青岛市妇女孕期体重增长状况调查[A];妇幼与青少年营养进展学术研讨会及《中国孕妇、乳母和0-6岁儿童膳食指南》宣传推广会论文汇编[C];2009年

5 刘燕萍;李宁;陈伟;李杰;刘鹏举;刘莉;;妊娠糖尿病孕晚期血脂特点及与孕期体重变化的关系[A];第11届中国营养学会全国临床营养学术会议论文(摘要)汇编[C];2007年

6 吴琦嫦;;妊娠糖尿病孕妇孕前体重指数及孕期体重增长对新生儿出生体重的影响[A];首届全国妊娠糖尿病研究进展学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2005年

7 张媛;;孕期体重对妊娠结局的影响[A];首届中国西部营养与健康、亚健康学术会议论文集[C];2005年

8 孙宝治;李娟;宋清萍;徐风森;王兰;修俊灵;;孕前体重及孕期体重增加对妊娠结局的影响[A];面向21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展(下册)[C];1999年

9 毛丽梅;陆青贵;;《美国IOM修订的孕期增重指南》简报[A];中国营养学会妇幼营养第七次全国学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

相关重要报纸文章 前9条

1 林树侯;控制孕期体重避免难产[N];家庭医生报;2006年

2 王晶;孕期体重暴增 产后减肥难[N];卫生与生活报;2007年

3 北京协和医院妇产科副教授 龚晓明;孕期体重 增加多少有学问[N];健康报;2013年

4 罗照春;孕期体重过增 孩子也易肥胖[N];中国中医药报;2007年

5 北京妇产医院 姜莹;孕期增重多少算合适[N];健康报;2009年

6 王旭峰;妊娠应该怎么吃[N];卫生与生活报;2010年

7 ;孕妇增重过多日后易患肥胖症[N];新华每日电讯;2010年

8 北京积水潭医院妇产科 任霞 靳晓方 整理;孕期至少做五次B超[N];健康报;2013年

9 主治医师 韩咏霞;孕期增重有讲究[N];保健时报;2004年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 陈震宇;肥胖与不良妊娠结局的关系及其相关机制的研究[D];中国医科大学;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前7条

1 杨慧;孕前BMI及孕期体重增加对新生儿出生体重及妊娠结局的影响[D];河北医科大学;2015年

2 冯玲;孕期体重增加的影响因素与新生儿出生体重的队列研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年

3 隋洪洋;孕前及孕期体重对产科并发症及妊娠结局的影响[D];大连医科大学;2015年

4 徐恒;孕前BMI、孕期体重增加及孕期血脂变化对妊娠期糖尿病围产结局的影响[D];浙江大学;2016年

5 李颖;农村妇女孕期肥胖对妊娠结局的影响[D];山东大学;2017年

6 高文削;孕前体重指数和孕期体重增长水平与妊娠期代谢综合征发病的相关性[D];郑州大学;2014年

7 燕素英;孕前及孕期体重与产科并发症及妊娠结局的关系[D];山西医科大学;2010年



本文编号:2482963

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2482963.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3ed33***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com