负压封闭引流联合游离植皮对深度烧伤感染创面的疗效研究
本文关键词: 负压封闭引流 游离植皮 深度烧伤 感染 出处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2017年09期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:目的探讨负压封闭引流联合游离植皮对深度烧伤感染创面的疗效,为临床提高治愈率提供依据。方法选取医院烧伤科就诊的深度烧伤感染患者112例,分为对照组和研究组,每组各56例,对照组给予常规的游离植皮,研究组给予负压封闭引流联合游离植皮,比较两组患者的创面愈合时间、上皮组织完全覆盖创面时间、住院时间、疼痛评分、10d愈合率、病原菌感染情况、并发症发生率以及植皮成活效果。结果研究组患者的创面愈合时间低于对照组,研究组10d创面愈合率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组患者的上皮组织完全覆盖创面时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组,研究组疼痛评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗前,对照组共培养出病原菌72株,研究组共培养出病原菌75例,均以革兰阴性菌为主,主要包括鲍氏不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠埃希菌;革兰阳性菌主要包括表皮葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌;治疗后,对照组感染率为16.1%(9/56),研究组感染率为1.8%(1/56),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后,对照组病原菌以鲍氏不动杆菌和大肠埃希菌为主,研究组感染的病原菌为鲍氏不动杆菌;研究组患者治疗期间的并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组患者的植皮成活总有效率和效果优的比例显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论将负压封闭引流联合游离植皮应用于深度烧伤感染创面的治疗可以有效促进创面愈合、提升总体疗效,降低患者感染,减少并发症和提升植皮成活率。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of negative pressure sealing drainage combined with free skin grafting on deep burn infected wounds, and to provide the basis for clinical improvement of cure rate. Methods 112 patients with deep burn infection were selected and divided into control group and study group. 56 cases in each group were given routine free skin graft in control group, and the patients in study group were given negative pressure closed drainage combined with free skin graft. The wound healing time, the time of complete covering of the wound and the time of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. Results the healing time of the patients in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the wound healing rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), the time of covering the wound completely and the hospitalization time of the patients in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the pain score in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05); before treatment, the pain score of the study group was lower than the control group. 72 strains of pathogens were cultured in the control group and 75 cases were cultured in the study group. The main pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Gram-positive bacteria mainly included Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. After treatment, the infection rate in the control group was 16.110 / 56.The infection rate in the study group was 1.810 / 56. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli were the main pathogens in the control group, Acinetobacter baumannii was the main pathogen in the study group, and the incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), the proportion of total effective rate and excellent effect of skin grafting in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Conclusion the application of negative pressure sealing drainage combined with free skin grafting in the treatment of deep burn infection wounds can effectively promote wound healing, improve the overall efficacy, reduce the infection of patients, reduce complications and increase the survival rate of skin grafts.
【作者单位】: 台州市第一人民医院烧伤外科;台州市第一人民医院检验科;
【基金】:浙江省卫生厅医药科技计划资助项目(20152922)
【分类号】:R644
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 康映泉;邱宏;徐迪;;负压封闭引流联合逆行腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣治疗儿童足跟软组织缺损[J];泰山医学院学报;2014年02期
2 张连阳;;重视负压封闭引流在腹部外科中的应用[J];创伤外科杂志;2012年05期
3 王大鹏;;负压封闭引流治疗骨折合并软组织缺损80例临床观察[J];中外医疗;2010年27期
4 鄢飞;鲍同柱;;负压封闭引流促进软组织创伤愈合的研究进展[J];中国全科医学;2008年06期
5 沈光裕;谢金;李鸿明;李泰昌;;负压封闭引流在顽固性创面修复中的应用[J];海南医学;2010年24期
6 刘朝普;李昌华;韦功滨;项震;;负压封闭引流在创伤外科的应用[J];重庆医学;2013年24期
7 张鹏飞;;负压封闭引流在肢体软组织缺损中的应用[J];创伤外科杂志;2014年01期
8 杨越涛;张晓华;李英才;姚元章;麻晓林;张连阳;;反植皮联合负压封闭引流治疗肢体大面积皮肤撕脱伤[J];创伤外科杂志;2007年03期
9 刘伟;肖军;郑佐勇;肖艳;李晓菲;区广鹏;黄瑞良;艾合买提江·玉素甫;;腹股沟皮瓣游离移植联合负压封闭引流修复胫前大面积软组织缺损[J];中国组织工程研究;2014年18期
10 徐君毅;黄世锋;王炜;;负压封闭引流治疗低位肛门直肠周围脓肿41例临床疗效观察[J];结直肠肛门外科;2013年02期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 陈昊;;负压封闭引流的研究进展[A];《中华急诊医学杂志》第八届组稿会暨急诊医学首届青年论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
2 李晓阳;李志杰;陈星隆;;负压封闭引流在骨科应用失误的处理及原因分析[A];2009年浙江省显微外科、手外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
3 李晓阳;李志杰;陈星隆;;负压封闭引流在骨科应用失误的处理及原因分析[A];2009年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
4 申传安;柴家科;李阳;盛志勇;;负压封闭引流在治疗小儿烫伤创面中的应用[A];中华医学会烧伤外科学分会2009年学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
5 白祥军;唐朝晖;陈安民;郑国寿;刘开俊;易成腊;杨朝晖;;负压封闭引流在控制严重创伤全身炎症反应第二次打击中的作用[A];2007年浙江省医学会骨科学学术会议暨浙江省抗癌协会骨软肿瘤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张陈威;负压封闭引流联合人工真皮移植治疗难愈性创面的研究[D];南方医科大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 王文津;双层负压封闭引流治疗术后淋巴漏的临床及基础研究[D];第二军医大学;2015年
2 裴周莹;VSD联合植皮对比传统打包植皮治疗体表大面积皮肤缺损临床疗效的Meta分析[D];山西医科大学;2016年
3 陈晓明;负压封闭引流在狭长窄蒂皮瓣移植中的临床研究[D];苏州大学;2014年
4 曹广通;负压封闭引流治疗糖尿病慢性溃疡的临床效果评价[D];宁夏医科大学;2014年
5 颜超;33例手部高压油漆注射伤的临床分析[D];大连医科大学;2014年
6 李念;负压封闭引流技术在乳房脓肿治疗中的临床应用[D];吉林大学;2015年
,本文编号:1547372
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jjyx/1547372.html